Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() mmellor wrote: Stephen Furley wrote: Rupert Candy wrote: and converting the electrical system from standard 3rd rail to side-contact. Bottom contact; side contact was Manchester - Bury, and I think after conversion, Holcombe Brook, which was originally overhead. The shoegear in New York is interesting; it's a sort of Manchester - Bury system turned on its side. It's top contact, but the rail is protceted except for a narrow gap on the inner side, and the shoe is a flate plate which comes in from the side to contact the top of the rail. New York has three separate third-rail systems: Metro-North (ex NYC), LIRR (ex PRR), & the Subway. The Subway is top-contact; LIRR is top-contact, with a protective board on top; & Metro-North is bottom-contact. (I think I've got that right.) I imagine that you're referring to the LIRR? Mike, my knowledge of New York is not that great; I should have said that *some* of the third rail was as I described; I did not intend to imply that all of it was000. I've certainly seen protected third rail on both PATH and the Subway. I've only used Metro-North from Harlem 125th Street to GCT, and the LIRR from Jamaica to Penn Station; I can't remember what system these used. I've used the Metro-North Port Jervis line, from Hoboken, but only just into New York (Suffern), but that line is not electrified. I've frequently ridden the NJT service between Trenton and Newark, aand occasionally through to New York, but that is overhead. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Loading gauge question | London Transport | |||
CTRL loading gauge | London Transport | |||
Track Charts or Track maps of the London Underground | London Transport | |||
Loading gauge | London Transport | |||
LUL track gauge not the same as BR gauge? | London Transport |