Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Paul Corfield wrote: There is nothing I have read that says that travelcard holders travelling within their zonal validity must touch in and out. The obvious reason for this is that there is no requirement on such journeys to activate a claim against the pre-pay purse on the card. Hello fellow LUL man! The two reasons I usually give my punters for making sure they always touch in and out with a season ticket (apart from its easier than vaulting over the gate...) is that if they don't, 1) they cannot claim for any disruptions as there will be no record of their journey and 2) over time if no-one touches in and out, there's no record of their journeys and services may be trimmed as there are apparently less people using the trains. Especially in Suburban areas. I've read through all 40 posts (I've never seen such activity on an internet thread I started!) and don't think this has been mentioned. Additional to the £4.00 charge for incomplete journeys, Oyster cards will now require either a valid season ticket, OR a minimum of £5 credit or they will not function. I believe this is a reaction to the fact people would stick £1.00 on the card as minimum fare that would open the gates, then worry about their negative balance later (something that contradicts the Conditions of Carriage). |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
BBC discovers that Oyster users can be overcharged for incomplete journeys | London Transport | |||
BBC discovers that Oyster users can be overcharged for incomplete journeys | London Transport | |||
Oyster incomplete journeys - further info | London Transport | |||
No cap applied to Oyster prepay with incomplete journeys? | London Transport | |||
No cap applied to Oyster prepay with incomplete journeys? | London Transport |