Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
FCC new stock
Funny you should mention it - happened to me this afternoon (1233 from
Stevenage wedged). So on getting home, I emailed FCC and about 20 minutes ago (yes, 0030 on a Sunday morning), got the following reply: I think I was on an earlier one and it still was rammed (12.29/Potters Bar). Not even a stand in first class, you physically couldn't have got on the thing! It left about 30 people behind. Their reply is fine as far as sympathy goes but short on action I know short units double the fleet maintenence intervals but it shouldn't be at passenger detriment. Footy demand is easily planned and addressed but better would be make them all 8's off peak and weekends. I understand during peaks given available stock, paths and platform lengths overcrowding can occur and there isn't an easy or instant answer. But no excuse making people stand off peak and weekends just to help their servicing costs! These off peak and weekend people are more likely to have paid for tickets rather than commuters travelling 'for free'. Just the sort of people the railway should be nice to - those who can use alternatives, rather than commuters who are pretty much forced onto the crowded and standing-room railways with no viable alternative. D |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
FCC new stock
Dave Plumb wrote:
I know short units double the fleet maintenence intervals but it shouldn't be at passenger detriment. Footy demand is easily planned and addressed but better would be make them all 8's off peak and weekends. At off-peak times, shorter trains make women and others safer from crime. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
FCC new stock
I know short units double the fleet maintenence intervals but it
shouldn't be at passenger detriment. Footy demand is easily planned and addressed but better would be make them all 8's off peak and weekends. At off-peak times, shorter trains make women and others safer from crime. Then the rail company need to put security guards on the trains, it's not an answer to run short (packed) trains to make people feel safer. D |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
FCC new stock
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006, Dave Plumb wrote:
I know short units double the fleet maintenence intervals but it shouldn't be at passenger detriment. Footy demand is easily planned and addressed but better would be make them all 8's off peak and weekends. At off-peak times, shorter trains make women and others safer from crime. Then the rail company need to put security guards on the trains, it's not an answer to run short (packed) trains to make people feel safer. Hang on, wires have become crossed here - John was making a safety objection to running long trains when they *aren't* packed, ie off-peak times when there's no football. When they are packed, long trains are just as safe from that point of view, since (i assume) the safety comes from having a sufficiently high density of bystanders to deter have-a-go villains. Indeed, when you've got football crush loads, longer trains would *increase* safety, due to less, er, crushing! Still, i agree that trains should be safe spaces for passengers, regardless of how busy they are. Bringing back guards to DOO trains, and giving them better training and support, would help in this. CCTV in all cars would be good too (do we already have this?). Another possibility might be to designate a protected carriage, perhaps the front one, which would be continuously monitored over CCTV by the driver (er, perfectly safe, i'm sure), so that if anything untoward happened, help could be summoned. tom -- If a scientist were to cut his ear off, no one would take it as evidence of heightened sensibility -- Peter Medawar |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
FCC new stock
and giving them better training and support, would help in this. CCTV
in all cars would be good too (do we already have this?). Another All the FCC 317's and 313's I've been on recently have CCTV but this is more evidential after the fact rather than anyone watching it live. The reason for the 4 car presentation was given just now on uk.railway as short platforms between Royston and Cambridge affecting stoppers. Reasonable on safety grounds but surely this isn't news to the railway, it's been like that since the stations were built! D |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
FCC new stock
Funny you should mention it - happened to me this afternoon (1233
from Stevenage wedged). So on getting home, I emailed FCC and about 20 minutes ago (yes, 0030 on a Sunday morning), got the following The new timetable is out and my early morning train that isn't packed has been retimed (0656 ex Potters Bar) so that's ten minutes less in bloody bed The earlier fast (0649) is standing room only by the time it gets here, how can that be at 7am? Oh yes, four cars ... No trains sat/sun from 31st March too. Deep joy! As a shift worker the car is now starting to make more sense. D |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why isn't the 2009 stock walk through like the S stock? | London Transport | |||
New experience on FCC | London Transport | |||
FCC compensation for days of disruption Bedford to Brighton line | London Transport | |||
TfL / NLL / Metronet surface stock / tube stock / Croxley link | London Transport | |||
1938 Stock on Uxbridge 100 and T Stock? | London Transport |