![]() |
Different approach to smart card travel
"Neil Williams" wrote in news:1170545651.563447.164620
@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups.com: SNIP Compared with this, Uncle Ken's Tube tourist tax isn't half as bad, as at least anyone can put in a bit of effort and get an Oyster card to avoid it. (The trick I use to avoid it is to buy all the tickets I think I'm going to need in one go from the machines at Schiphol, because they do take credit cards and will issue undated tickets including to/from other stations). Last time I was in Schipol, my mate's Electron Visa wouldn't work in the machines for the train travel tickets to Amsterdam, and I had to buy his and mine on my Switch Maestro. |
Different approach to smart card travel
On Feb 3, 11:37 pm, "Tristán White"
wrote: Last time I was in Schipol, my mate's Electron Visa wouldn't work in the machines for the train travel tickets to Amsterdam, and I had to buy his and mine on my Switch Maestro. I forgot about Electron - these aren't widely accepted for a lot of things due to the requirement for online authorisation. ISTR the UK TOCs don't accept them either. Neil |
Different approach to smart card travel
On 3 Feb 2007 15:34:11 -0800, "Neil Williams"
wrote: On Feb 3, 5:54 pm, "sweek" wrote: It's coins or debit cards only, which is absolutely stupid. Not only that, but *Maestro* debit cards only, which rules out about 50% of UK cards as about half the UK banks issue Visa debit cards, which are generally processed as if they were a credit card for international stuff. They also take those Chipknip cards, but for peeps with no local bank a/c coupled to a card this means a 6% surcharge if using prepaid chipknip (53 euro for a 50 euro card time-limited). Prepaid is necessary for foreign tourists and oiks like me having to eat in remote canteens. Fill up with coins for the NS machines or queue up to cough up the 50c surcharge. It's always been a stubborn country for credit cards - merchants never caught on to the benefits. (The trick I use to avoid it is to buy all the tickets I think I'm going to need in one go from the machines at Schiphol, because they do take credit cards and will issue undated tickets including to/from other stations). I'll be trying that tomorrow morning! I'm getting erratic failures on credit cards from those machines - get all the way through then rejected. -- Old anti-spam address cmylod at despammed dot com appears broke So back to cmylod at bigfoot dot com |
Different approach to smart card travel
On Feb 4, 10:30 pm, Colum Mylod wrote:
I'll be trying that tomorrow morning! I'm getting erratic failures on credit cards from those machines - get all the way through then rejected. Make sure you use the ones in the main ticket hall with a "proper" credit card reader rather than the ones in the baggage hall that don't. I have a less than 50% success rate with the latter, but a 100% success rate with the former - I suspect the latter don't read the strip properly, or have a dodgy ISDN connection for doing the authorisations - and if you're on KL 1558 from LCY I might see you there ;) Neil |
Different approach to smart card travel
On 4 Feb 2007 15:17:36 -0800, "Neil Williams"
wrote: On Feb 4, 10:30 pm, Colum Mylod wrote: I'll be trying that tomorrow morning! I'm getting erratic failures on credit cards from those machines - get all the way through then rejected. Make sure you use the ones in the main ticket hall with a "proper" credit card reader rather than the ones in the baggage hall that don't. I have a less than 50% success rate with the latter, but a 100% success rate with the former - I suspect the latter don't read the strip properly, or have a dodgy ISDN connection for doing the authorisations - and if you're on KL 1558 from LCY I might see you there ;) I used the baggage hall ones ("bags expected on the belt 08:58".. "bags on belt now"... pull the other one for 15 more mins, plenty of time to find the Zonder Datum button). As you said, card 1 rejected, card 2 accepted. Next time I'll use my Nectar first just to clean the slot! Max 3 tickets which is a bummer since I needed 2 singles for Mon and a return for more days. BD101 from LHR where "security" was backed up before Boots (an indication of queuing up before the main entry airside). Sigh. LHR is a shabby chaotic dump. Luckily departure gate was 16 and not the extra-secure 25a. For some reason the gods frown and we often get double screened, laptops out again. Shoes off appears to be new to T1? -- Old anti-spam address cmylod at despammed dot com appears broke So back to cmylod at bigfoot dot com |
Different approach to smart card travel
On Feb 6, 11:18 am, Colum Mylod wrote:
BD101 from LHR where "security" was backed up before Boots (an indication of queuing up before the main entry airside). Sigh. LHR is a shabby chaotic dump. Luckily departure gate was 16 and not the extra-secure 25a. For some reason the gods frown and we often get double screened, laptops out again. Shoes off appears to be new to T1? Dunno, I avoid LHR like the plague as it is, as you describe, a dump. Unless you live very near LHR, *all* the other options are better (LCY, LTN, STN, LGW less so but still better than LHR). Neil |
Different approach to smart card travel
On Feb 6, 1:04 pm, "Neil Williams" wrote:
Dunno, I avoid LHR like the plague as it is, as you describe, a dump. Unless you live very near LHR, *all* the other options are better (LCY, LTN, STN, LGW less so but still better than LHR). Notably, the queue to get through security at LTN is 10 minutes at most for the red-eyes (which it appears BD101 is), and that's the very worst I've ever seen it. LCY had a queue on the day after the farce in the summer, but since then it's back to straight through, especially now they have 3 machines in operation with the expanded screening area, though if I go through there it's normally nearer 8:30am. STN and LGW can be worse than LTN and LCY (notice the BAA influence here) but not, I'm told, as bad. Flying from City in the Fokker 50s (either VLM or KLM, not a lot to choose between them) is a real pleasure - like flying used to be, it could be said. Give it a go, though the downside is that punctuality can be a bit poor at times. Neil |
Different approach to smart card travel
Neil Williams wrote:
Flying from City in the Fokker 50s (either VLM or KLM, not a lot to choose between them) is a real pleasure - like flying used to be, it could be said. Give it a go, though the downside is that punctuality can be a bit poor at times. Neil I find this is best way to get to NL from London. It's usually very low in stress. The Fokkers are great fun to fly on. Like Neil said, punctuality can suffer though, and pray you don't land in Haarlem - or what feels like it, that runway is a LONG way from the terminal. KLM stick you on the stands and bus you into Arrivals, VLM have their own gate. It depends how far you want to walk! Back onto the NS ticketing fiasco, there's a change machine cunningly hidden in what's left of the booking office at Amsterdam Centraal. Last time I was there no-one was using it, prefering, instead to queue for the surcharged tickets. What would be really nice, and I can't ever see this happening, is reciprocal use of smrtcards across compatible networks. According to Wiki, TfL and GVB are using MIFARE cards. I just like the idea using one card where I can. Mark. |
Different approach to smart card travel
On 6 Feb 2007 04:04:50 -0800, "Neil Williams"
wrote: On Feb 6, 11:18 am, Colum Mylod wrote: BD101 from LHR where "security" was backed up before Boots (an indication of queuing up before the main entry airside). Sigh. LHR is a shabby chaotic dump. Luckily departure gate was 16 and not the extra-secure 25a. For some reason the gods frown and we often get double screened, laptops out again. Shoes off appears to be new to T1? Dunno, I avoid LHR like the plague as it is, as you describe, a dump. Unless you live very near LHR, *all* the other options are better (LCY, LTN, STN, LGW less so but still better than LHR). Assuming you *have* other (reasonable) options. |
Different approach to smart card travel
On Feb 7, 6:36 am, James Farrar wrote:
Assuming you *have* other (reasonable) options. The destination being discussed was Amsterdam, to which there are flights from *every* London airport. Plenty of other options. Conveniently, most destinations are also accessible *via* Amsterdam, though I'm led to believe the luggage handling isn't exactly optimal. Neil |
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:07 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk