Central Line Train Off The Road
Tube train derails in rush hour
A London Underground (LU) train has derailed during the morning rush hour, police have said. Up to six carriages came off the rails on the westbound Central Line between Mile End and Bethnal Green stations at about 0900 BST. There are no reports of injuries, according to a British Transport Police (BTP) spokesman. Central Line services are suspended between Leytonstone and Liverpool Street, causing minor delays. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/6272662.stm |
Central Line Train Off The Road
contrex wrote:
Tube train derails in rush hour A London Underground (LU) train has derailed during the morning rush hour, police have said. Up to six carriages came off the rails on the westbound Central Line between Mile End and Bethnal Green stations at about 0900 BST. There are no reports of injuries, according to a British Transport Police (BTP) spokesman. Central Line services are suspended between Leytonstone and Liverpool Street, causing minor delays. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/6272662.stm LU report timed at 10:12: "CENTRAL LINE: Suspended between Leytonstone and Liverpool Street due to a derailed train in the Mile End area. Severe delays are occurring on the rest of the line." Also that Mile End ststion has been closed. -- Richard J. (to email me, swap 'uk' and 'yon' in address) |
Central Line Train Off The Road
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/6272662.stm
BBC page now says passenger has leg injury, there may have been obstruction on track. |
Central Line Train Off The Road
I hope they won't close it for several months again... :-|
|
Central Line Train Off The Road
On Jul 5, 10:43 am, alex_t wrote:
I hope they won't close it for several months again... :-| No, that was several years ago. Things are much worse with H&S now, it'll probably be shut until 2025. Neill |
Central Line Train Off The Road
On Jul 5, 10:46 am, verbena wrote:
On Jul 5, 10:43 am, alex_t wrote: I hope they won't close it for several months again... :-| No, that was several years ago. Things are much worse with H&S now, it'll probably be shut until 2025. Neill Something probably fell of the train ahead...... ERU out there more cash for Tubelines |
Central Line Train Off The Road
ERU out there more cash for Tubelines Tubelines? |
Central Line Train Off The Road
On Jul 5, 10:53 am, alex_t wrote:
ERU out there more cash for Tubelines Tubelines? The Infraco company that looks after the Picc, Jub and Northern lines amongst other things. Also incident train nearly finished being detrained |
Central Line Train Off The Road
The Infraco company that looks after the Picc, Jub and Northern lines amongst other things. Also incident train nearly finished being detrained I know what Tubelines is, I just didn't understand how "ERU out" applies to Tubelines in the context of the current derailment on the MetroNet line. |
Central Line Train Off The Road
On Jul 5, 11:04 am, alex_t wrote:
The Infraco company that looks after the Picc, Jub and Northern lines amongst other things. Also incident train nearly finished being detrained I know what Tubelines is, I just didn't understand how "ERU out" applies to Tubelines in the context of the current derailment on the MetroNet line. The ERU will attend the incident. As an aside Metronet still havent been paid for the extra work following the Chancery Lane derailment. |
Central Line Train Off The Road
alex_t wrote:
The Infraco company that looks after the Picc, Jub and Northern lines amongst other things. Also incident train nearly finished being detrained I know what Tubelines is, I just didn't understand how "ERU out" applies to Tubelines in the context of the current derailment on the MetroNet line. The ERU (Emergency Response Unit) is part of Tube Lines. -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
Central Line Train Off The Road
The ERU (Emergency Response Unit) is part of Tube Lines. Ah, now I understand! Thank you! |
Central Line Train Off The Road
On 5 Jul, 10:06, contrex wrote:
Central Line services are suspended between Leytonstone and Liverpool Street, causing minor delays. Not for those stuck on the train. As usual when the line is closed from Liverpool St to Leytonstone, those out west are abandoned. In the last few months there have been 2 or 3 suspensions in this part of the line, plus engineering works. A crossover to allow trains from the west to run to/from Stratford (even if it's only half the trains, the others reversing at Leytonstone) would allow people out west to connect to mainline, Jubilee and DLR services. Instead you're left to your own devices to get scummy busses to Walthamstow or Chingford (at least on the Epping branch) |
Central Line Train Off The Road
On Jul 5, 11:23 am, alex_t wrote:
The ERU (Emergency Response Unit) is part of Tube Lines. Ah, now I understand! Thank you! As others have implied the Emergency Response Unit is operated by Tubelines for the whole of the London Underground network - i.e. they deal with incidents on the lines maintained by Metronet as well as for Tubelines. |
Central Line Train Off The Road
On 5 Jul, 11:26, Paul Weaver wrote:
As usual when the line is closed from Liverpool St to Leytonstone, those out west are abandoned. In the last few months there have been 2 or 3 suspensions in this part of the line, plus engineering works. A crossover to allow trains from the west to run to/from Stratford (even if it's only half the trains, the others reversing at Leytonstone) would allow people out west to connect to mainline, Jubilee and DLR services. Instead you're left to your own devices to get scummy busses to Walthamstow or Chingford (at least on the Epping branch) ITYM "east"? -- John Band john at johnband dot org www.johnband.org |
Central Line Train Off The Road
On 5 Jul, 10:49, chunky munky wrote:
On Jul 5, 10:46 am, verbena wrote: On Jul 5, 10:43 am, alex_t wrote: I hope they won't close it for several months again... :-| No, that was several years ago. Things are much worse with H&S now, it'll probably be shut until 2025. Neill Something probably fell of the train ahead...... If it does turn out to be yet another bit falling off a train , could this be the end of the line for the 92 stock? B2003 |
Central Line Train Off The Road
Boltar wrote:
On 5 Jul, 10:49, chunky munky wrote: Something probably fell of the train ahead...... If it does turn out to be yet another bit falling off a train , could this be the end of the line for the 92 stock? Unlikely. Something falling off is more likely to be the result of poor maintenance - even if there was a design defect in the first place that resulted in nuts working loose as a result of vibration then they should have been spotted and replaced with a more secure fitting by the operators. |
Central Line Train Off The Road
On Jul 5, 1:12 pm, "Jack Taylor" wrote:
Boltar wrote: On 5 Jul, 10:49, chunky munky wrote: Something probably fell of the train ahead...... If it does turn out to be yet another bit falling off a train , could this be the end of the line for the 92 stock? Unlikely. Something falling off is more likely to be the result of poor maintenance - even if there was a design defect in the first place that resulted in nuts working loose as a result of vibration then they should have been spotted and replaced with a more secure fitting by the operators. Howard Collins, deputy chief operating officer for London Underground, said something resembling "sheeting" had obstructed the track. "Initial reports from the driver are he saw something white flapping in the tunnel, before he hit it. There was a loud noise and then he hit the brakes," he said. |
Central Line Train Off The Road
On 5 Jul, 13:15, chunky munky wrote:
"Initial reports from the driver are he saw something white flapping in the tunnel, before he hit it. There was a loud noise and then he hit the brakes," he said. Evil ghosts? -- John Band john at johnband dot org www.johnband.org |
Central Line Train Off The Road
"chunky munky" wrote in message oups.com... On Jul 5, 1:12 pm, "Jack Taylor" wrote: Boltar wrote: On 5 Jul, 10:49, chunky munky wrote: Something probably fell of the train ahead...... If it does turn out to be yet another bit falling off a train , could this be the end of the line for the 92 stock? Unlikely. Something falling off is more likely to be the result of poor maintenance - even if there was a design defect in the first place that resulted in nuts working loose as a result of vibration then they should have been spotted and replaced with a more secure fitting by the operators. Howard Collins, deputy chief operating officer for London Underground, said something resembling "sheeting" had obstructed the track. "Initial reports from the driver are he saw something white flapping in the tunnel, before he hit it. There was a loud noise and then he hit the brakes," he said. I see the BBC keep changing Mr Collins' statements. They originally also had: "This is the first derailment we've had in passenger service for many many years on the underground," said Mr Collins." which now reads: "Mr Collins added that it was the first derailment of a passenger train for a number of years." presumably he or the BBC quickly realised that 'many many years' was just a bit too much spin... Paul S |
Central Line Train Off The Road
John B wrote:
On 5 Jul, 13:15, chunky munky wrote: "Initial reports from the driver are he saw something white flapping in the tunnel, before he hit it. There was a loud noise and then he hit the brakes," he said. Evil ghosts? KKK? |
Central Line Train Off The Road
On 5 Jul, 12:03, John B wrote:
On 5 Jul, 11:26, Paul Weaver wrote: As usual when the line is closed from Liverpool St to Leytonstone, those out west are abandoned. In the last few months there have been 2 or 3 suspensions in this part of the line, plus engineering works. A crossover to allow trains from the west to run to/from Stratford (even if it's only half the trains, the others reversing at Leytonstone) would allow people out west to connect to mainline, Jubilee and DLR services. Instead you're left to your own devices to get scummy busses to Walthamstow or Chingford (at least on the Epping branch) ITYM "east"? East, West, same thing :) My S.O. Was stuck on the train between Stratford and Mile End, had to walk through the tunnel to Mile End, and then (after being released from the holding pen) got charged for a trip from Bow Road to Liverpool Street, and had to buy a ticket to Chingford, just to get home. Can't reall be bothered with claiming the money back, but perhaps people evacced from trains should be given a permit to complete their journey free of charge by any means, along with the bottle of water? |
Central Line Train Off The Road
On Jul 5, 11:26 am, Paul Weaver wrote:
On 5 Jul, 10:06, contrex wrote: Central Line services are suspended between Leytonstone and Liverpool Street, causing minor delays. Not for those stuck on the train. As usual when the line is closed from Liverpool St to Leytonstone, those out west are abandoned. In the last few months there have been 2 or 3 suspensions in this part of the line, plus engineering works. A crossover to allow trains from the west to run to/from Stratford (even if it's only half the trains, the others reversing at Leytonstone) would allow people out west to connect to mainline, Jubilee and DLR services. Instead you're left to your own devices to get scummy busses to Walthamstow or Chingford (at least on the Epping branch) A crossover at Stratford is desirable but major works would be needed to provide one in the tunnels either side of the station. Since these tunnels start immediately before and after the platforms there may not be sufficient space for a crossover at surface level. Even if there was enough room this would also involve a flat crossing of the Network Rail main line into Liverpool Street (which runs between the Central Line tracks at Stratford Station). This would probably be unacceptable to NR because of the signalling complications and the likely delays to NR services every time it was used. |
Central Line Train Off The Road
London, 5 July 2007 - A Metronet spokesperson said: "Shortly after 9am this morning, the three leading bogies of a Central Line train came off the rails in a tunnel on the west-bound track between Mile End and Bethnal Green. "Whilst it is important not to pre-judge the outcome of the investigation, our initial reports suggest that a bale of material became dislodged from its licensed storage position in a tunnel cross- passage. "As a precaution, Metronet has ordered an immediate audit of all similar storage sites used by its staff and contractors - and this will be completed before the start of service tomorrow morning. To enable this work to proceed, Metronet has additionally ordered that all works be suspended tonight, with the exception of essential maintenance. We apologise to passengers for the distress that this morning's incident has caused - and for the inconvenience to the many people that use the Central line daily. "Working closely with London Underground, Metronet already has teams on site to start the work of restoring this section of the line to service as quickly as possible." ENDS |
Central Line Train Off The Road
"chunky munky" wrote in message
oups.com London, 5 July 2007 - A Metronet spokesperson said: "Shortly after 9am this morning, the three leading bogies of a Central Line train came off the rails in a tunnel on the west-bound track between Mile End and Bethnal Green. "Whilst it is important not to pre-judge the outcome of the investigation, our initial reports suggest that a bale of material became dislodged from its licensed storage position in a tunnel cross- passage. "As a precaution, Metronet has ordered an immediate audit of all similar storage sites used by its staff and contractors - and this will be completed before the start of service tomorrow morning. To enable this work to proceed, Metronet has additionally ordered that all works be suspended tonight, with the exception of essential maintenance. We apologise to passengers for the distress that this morning's incident has caused - and for the inconvenience to the many people that use the Central line daily. "Working closely with London Underground, Metronet already has teams on site to start the work of restoring this section of the line to Am I right in thinking that 1992 stock has smaller wheels than other Tube trains and is perhaps more likely to derail when it encounters something on the track? |
Central Line Train Off The Road
On Jul 5, 2:09 pm, "Recliner" wrote:
"chunky munky" wrote in message oups.com London, 5 July 2007 - A Metronet spokesperson said: "Shortly after 9am this morning, the three leading bogies of a Central Line train came off the rails in a tunnel on the west-bound track between Mile End and Bethnal Green. "Whilst it is important not to pre-judge the outcome of the investigation, our initial reports suggest that a bale of material became dislodged from its licensed storage position in a tunnel cross- passage. "As a precaution, Metronet has ordered an immediate audit of all similar storage sites used by its staff and contractors - and this will be completed before the start of service tomorrow morning. To enable this work to proceed, Metronet has additionally ordered that all works be suspended tonight, with the exception of essential maintenance. We apologise to passengers for the distress that this morning's incident has caused - and for the inconvenience to the many people that use the Central line daily. "Working closely with London Underground, Metronet already has teams on site to start the work of restoring this section of the line to Am I right in thinking that 1992 stock has smaller wheels than other Tube trains and is perhaps more likely to derail when it encounters something on the track? All LU Rolling Stock now have the same sized wheels. |
Central Line Train Off The Road
On 5 Jul, 14:09, "Recliner" wrote:
Am I right in thinking that 1992 stock has smaller wheels than other Tube trains and is perhaps more likely to derail when it encounters something on the track? It does seem strange that a heavy train could become derailed by something light enough to have become dislodged by vibration or air movements and apparently flap around in the wind. B2003 |
Central Line Train Off The Road
On Jul 5, 2:31 pm, Boltar wrote:
On 5 Jul, 14:09, "Recliner" wrote: Am I right in thinking that 1992 stock has smaller wheels than other Tube trains and is perhaps more likely to derail when it encounters something on the track? It does seem strange that a heavy train could become derailed by something light enough to have become dislodged by vibration or air movements and apparently flap around in the wind. B2003 "Our initial reports suggest that a bale of material became dislodged from its licensed storage position in a tunnel cross-passage," said a Metronet spokesman. Whatever that means Neill |
Central Line Train Off The Road
chunky munky wrote:
On Jul 5, 2:09 pm, "Recliner" wrote: Am I right in thinking that 1992 stock has smaller wheels than other Tube trains and is perhaps more likely to derail when it encounters something on the track? All LU Rolling Stock now have the same sized wheels. Not according to the rolling stock dimensions page at Tube Prune ( http://www.trainweb.org/tubeprune/Dimensions.htm ) That shows that 92 stock does indeed have the smallest wheel diameter of 700 mm. The others a 95, 96: 770 mm 67, 72, 73, D: 788 mm A, C: 915 mm -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
Central Line Train Off The Road
On Jul 5, 2:41 pm, verbena wrote:
On Jul 5, 2:31 pm, Boltar wrote: On 5 Jul, 14:09, "Recliner" wrote: Am I right in thinking that 1992 stock has smaller wheels than other Tube trains and is perhaps more likely to derail when it encounters something on the track? It does seem strange that a heavy train could become derailed by something light enough to have become dislodged by vibration or air movements and apparently flap around in the wind. B2003 "Our initial reports suggest that a bale of material became dislodged from its licensed storage position in a tunnel cross-passage," said a Metronet spokesman. Whatever that means Neill 'tunnel cross passage' = A passageway between the eastbound and westbound tunnels 'licensed storage position' = contractors need a licence to leave stuff they are using at specific locations on LUL property. If there is room it saves them having to bring it in every night. I think storage licensing has been required ever since the Kings Cross fire which involved stuff under the escalator which should not have been left there. 'bale of material' = contractors stuff 'dislodged' fell off the pile - possibly should have been better secured |
Central Line Train Off The Road
On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 06:31:25 -0700, Boltar
wrote: On 5 Jul, 14:09, "Recliner" wrote: Am I right in thinking that 1992 stock has smaller wheels than other Tube trains and is perhaps more likely to derail when it encounters something on the track? It does seem strange that a heavy train could become derailed by something light enough to have become dislodged by vibration or air movements and apparently flap around in the wind. Maybe, but a train has considerable forward momentum so wouldn't take too much to derail if the obstruction was in exactly the right (or wrong, perhaps) position. |
Central Line Train Off The Road
On Jul 5, 4:23 pm, Ken Wheatley wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 06:31:25 -0700, Boltar wrote: On 5 Jul, 14:09, "Recliner" wrote: Am I right in thinking that 1992 stock has smaller wheels than other Tube trains and is perhaps more likely to derail when it encounters something on the track? It does seem strange that a heavy train could become derailed by something light enough to have become dislodged by vibration or air movements and apparently flap around in the wind. Maybe, but a train has considerable forward momentum so wouldn't take too much to derail if the obstruction was in exactly the right (or wrong, perhaps) position. Exactly.One of the last derailments was a train at Ryneers lane that had its shoegear dislodged, theis then derailed it. |
Central Line Train Off The Road
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Boltar wrote:
On 5 Jul, 14:09, "Recliner" wrote: Am I right in thinking that 1992 stock has smaller wheels than other Tube trains and is perhaps more likely to derail when it encounters something on the track? It does seem strange that a heavy train could become derailed by something light enough to have become dislodged by vibration or air movements and apparently flap around in the wind. If this light flappy thing made its way onto the line, it's possible other things did too. For instance, if there had been a pile of crowbars wrapped in a tea-towel (or something more plausible to that effect), and that had fallen onto the track. tom -- It not infrequently happens that something about the earth, about the sky, about other elements of this world, about the motion and rotation or even the magnitude and distances of the stars, about definite eclipses of the sun and moon, about the passage of years and seasons, about the nature of animals, of fruits, of stones, and of other such things, may be known with the greatest certainty by reasoning or by experience. -- St Augustine |
Central Line Train Off The Road
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 20:19:17 +0100, Tom Anderson
wrote: On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Boltar wrote: On 5 Jul, 14:09, "Recliner" wrote: Am I right in thinking that 1992 stock has smaller wheels than other Tube trains and is perhaps more likely to derail when it encounters something on the track? It does seem strange that a heavy train could become derailed by something light enough to have become dislodged by vibration or air movements and apparently flap around in the wind. If this light flappy thing made its way onto the line, it's possible other things did too. For instance, if there had been a pile of crowbars wrapped in a tea-towel (or something more plausible to that effect), and that had fallen onto the track. tom how does the underground get stock like this out of the way, I don't think they have any shunters, do they have to bring a battery loco in ? |
Central Line Train Off The Road
"Martyn Dawe" wrote in message ... how does the underground get stock like this out of the way, I don't think they have any shunters, do they have to bring a battery loco in ? Several battery locos, once the incident train was re-railed. |
Central Line Train Off The Road
On Jul 9, 4:37 pm, "Robin Mayes" wrote:
"Martyn Dawe" wrote in message ... how does the underground get stock like this out of the way, I don't think they have any shunters, do they have to bring a battery loco in ? Several battery locos, once the incident train was re-railed. I believe it was 5. After the bombings in 2005, the stalled trains were moved using some battery locos and brake vans that were found in the Museum! These brake vans have now been repaired so that they can couple a battery loco to Surface Stock. Tubeline's Transplant also have a fleet of schoma diesels and various and tampers and other engineering trains. These can operate on all lines at any time (except the Victoria, no pax trains allowed and the Central only if they are ATPthink ;-) ) |
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:03 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk