Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6 Jul, 08:44, wrote:
On 6 Jul, 03:20, TheOneKEA wrote: On Jul 5, 5:07 pm, Bob wrote: Possible bidders would include Britain's top five bus and rail operators, Stagecoach Group (SGC.L: Quote, Profile , Research), Go- Ahead Group (GOG.L: Quote, Profile , Research), First Group (FGP.L: Quote, Profile , Research), National Express (NEX.L: Quote, Profile , Research) and Arriva (ARI.L: Quote, Profile , Research), as well as Germany's Deutsche Bahn [DBN.UL] and French bus and rail operator Keolis, the source added. Oh wonderful. If any of the usual suspects acquire it I can see Chiltern getting sucked into a tiolet tank and turned into a shadow of its clean, reliable, expansionist, common-sense self. Whoopee. *has horrible mental images of Barbie swirls all over the 168/Xs* There are suggestions going round that whilst Chiltern is doing very well on punctuality etc. there are many problems to do with other "key performance indicators" linked to retaining the franchise that need very urgent attention. (suggested as one reason behind the change of MD recently announced) - so whilst it may seem to be doing very well it could be that there are issues that need to be resolved elsewhere in the company that we aren't aware of. Tony Probably not to do with 'key performance indicators', but my last few trips on Chiltern have been very disappointing train. A recent journey to Birmingham was on what was perhaps the grottiest train I have ever travelled on - the walls inside had ancient coffee stains, the carpets looked like they hadn't been cleaned in months and the table was sticky. Yuck. Their staff are good, and Marylebone station is a credit to them (I don't think it's a Network Rail one)... but I for one find Chiltern's reputation better than the reality. That said, I bet National Express will be keen to pick them up... or First. Please don't let it be First! Would a management buy out be viable (afterall that's what led to M40 Trains being created in the first place) B. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"ONscotland" wrote in message
ups.com... Probably not to do with 'key performance indicators', but my last few trips on Chiltern have been very disappointing train. A recent journey to Birmingham was on what was perhaps the grottiest train I have ever travelled on - the walls inside had ancient coffee stains, the carpets looked like they hadn't been cleaned in months and the table was sticky. Yuck. The other thing that would worry me if I were Chiltern is that, although Virgin's service is more expensive, it's not always as expensive as people think. I don't know if VT have increased their quotas of Value fares but I was surprised to find that as late as Wednesday I was able to book a First Advance ticket from New Street to Euston for Friday, at exactly the time I wanted to travel, for £29.50. I could have got Standard for £10. I was travelling on business so it was a no-brainer, but at that price I would have been tempted even if it had been a leisure trip, bearing in mind that the price includes coffee, soft drinks, a copy of the Times, some perfectly good sandwiches, and no screaming kids. It would still be a shame if Chiltern did go into decline. I for one was sorry that they didn't take over the Snow Hill suburban services in the recent WM shake-up. Regards Jonathan |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7 Jul, 18:42, ONscotland wrote:
On 6 Jul, 08:44, wrote: On 6 Jul, 03:20, TheOneKEA wrote: On Jul 5, 5:07 pm, Bob wrote: Possible bidders would include Britain's top five bus and rail operators, Stagecoach Group (SGC.L: Quote, Profile , Research), Go- Ahead Group (GOG.L: Quote, Profile , Research), First Group (FGP.L: Quote, Profile , Research), National Express (NEX.L: Quote, Profile , Research) and Arriva (ARI.L: Quote, Profile , Research), as well as Germany's Deutsche Bahn [DBN.UL] and French bus and rail operator Keolis, the source added. Oh wonderful. If any of the usual suspects acquire it I can see Chiltern getting sucked into a tiolet tank and turned into a shadow of its clean, reliable, expansionist, common-sense self. Whoopee. *has horrible mental images of Barbie swirls all over the 168/Xs* There are suggestions going round that whilst Chiltern is doing very well on punctuality etc. there are many problems to do with other "key performance indicators" linked to retaining the franchise that need very urgent attention. (suggested as one reason behind the change of MD recently announced) - so whilst it may seem to be doing very well it could be that there are issues that need to be resolved elsewhere in the company that we aren't aware of. Tony Probably not to do with 'key performance indicators', but my last few trips on Chiltern have been very disappointing train. A recent journey to Birmingham was on what was perhaps the grottiest train I have ever travelled on - the walls inside had ancient coffee stains, the carpets looked like they hadn't been cleaned in months and the table was sticky. Yuck. Their staff are good, and Marylebone station is a credit to them (I don't think it's a Network Rail one)... but I for one find Chiltern's reputation better than the reality. That said, I bet National Express will be keen to pick them up... or First. Please don't let it be First! Would a management buy out be viable (afterall that's what led to M40 Trains being created in the first place) Richard Bowker isn't a fan (so he told me) of buying up other franchises/businesses. And - re. another point - if Chiltern decide to "take their ball home" they lose a very large performance bond and could still be liable to pay any costs of running the franchise until it was re-let - including the cost of reletting it. When Connex let go of South Central early GoVia actually had to buy them out of the remainder of the franchise. Tony |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7 Jul, 22:33, wrote:
On 7 Jul, 18:42, ONscotland wrote: On 6 Jul, 08:44, wrote: On 6 Jul, 03:20, TheOneKEA wrote: On Jul 5, 5:07 pm, Bob wrote: Possible bidders would include Britain's top five bus and rail operators, Stagecoach Group (SGC.L: Quote, Profile , Research), Go- Ahead Group (GOG.L: Quote, Profile , Research), First Group (FGP.L: Quote, Profile , Research), National Express (NEX.L: Quote, Profile , Research) and Arriva (ARI.L: Quote, Profile , Research), as well as Germany's Deutsche Bahn [DBN.UL] and French bus and rail operator Keolis, the source added. Oh wonderful. If any of the usual suspects acquire it I can see Chiltern getting sucked into a tiolet tank and turned into a shadow of its clean, reliable, expansionist, common-sense self. Whoopee. *has horrible mental images of Barbie swirls all over the 168/Xs* There are suggestions going round that whilst Chiltern is doing very well on punctuality etc. there are many problems to do with other "key performance indicators" linked to retaining the franchise that need very urgent attention. (suggested as one reason behind the change of MD recently announced) - so whilst it may seem to be doing very well it could be that there are issues that need to be resolved elsewhere in the company that we aren't aware of. Tony Probably not to do with 'key performance indicators', but my last few trips on Chiltern have been very disappointing train. A recent journey to Birmingham was on what was perhaps the grottiest train I have ever travelled on - the walls inside had ancient coffee stains, the carpets looked like they hadn't been cleaned in months and the table was sticky. Yuck. Their staff are good, and Marylebone station is a credit to them (I don't think it's a Network Rail one)... but I for one find Chiltern's reputation better than the reality. That said, I bet National Express will be keen to pick them up... or First. Please don't let it be First! Would a management buy out be viable (afterall that's what led to M40 Trains being created in the first place) Richard Bowker isn't a fan (so he told me) of buying up other franchises/businesses. Tony I think that when they had nine franchises, I could see why they would wonder about buying TOCs. But they've lost seven franchises now. I can't see them standing back and letting Go Via or First or Stagecoach snapping up an opportunity like Chiltern. Plus it gets them the Overground again. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8 Jul, 08:28, ONscotland wrote:
On 7 Jul, 22:33, wrote: On 7 Jul, 18:42, ONscotland wrote: On 6 Jul, 08:44, wrote: On 6 Jul, 03:20, TheOneKEA wrote: On Jul 5, 5:07 pm, Bob wrote: Possible bidders would include Britain's top five bus and rail operators, Stagecoach Group (SGC.L: Quote, Profile , Research), Go- Ahead Group (GOG.L: Quote, Profile , Research), First Group (FGP.L: Quote, Profile , Research), National Express (NEX.L: Quote, Profile , Research) and Arriva (ARI.L: Quote, Profile , Research), as well as Germany's Deutsche Bahn [DBN.UL] and French bus and rail operator Keolis, the source added. Oh wonderful. If any of the usual suspects acquire it I can see Chiltern getting sucked into a tiolet tank and turned into a shadow of its clean, reliable, expansionist, common-sense self. Whoopee. *has horrible mental images of Barbie swirls all over the 168/Xs* There are suggestions going round that whilst Chiltern is doing very well on punctuality etc. there are many problems to do with other "key performance indicators" linked to retaining the franchise that need very urgent attention. (suggested as one reason behind the change of MD recently announced) - so whilst it may seem to be doing very well it could be that there are issues that need to be resolved elsewhere in the company that we aren't aware of. Tony Probably not to do with 'key performance indicators', but my last few trips on Chiltern have been very disappointing train. A recent journey to Birmingham was on what was perhaps the grottiest train I have ever travelled on - the walls inside had ancient coffee stains, the carpets looked like they hadn't been cleaned in months and the table was sticky. Yuck. Their staff are good, and Marylebone station is a credit to them (I don't think it's a Network Rail one)... but I for one find Chiltern's reputation better than the reality. That said, I bet National Express will be keen to pick them up... or First. Please don't let it be First! Would a management buy out be viable (afterall that's what led to M40 Trains being created in the first place) Richard Bowker isn't a fan (so he told me) of buying up other franchises/businesses. Tony I think that when they had nine franchises, I could see why they would wonder about buying TOCs. But they've lost seven franchises now. I can't see them standing back and letting Go Via or First or Stagecoach snapping up an opportunity like Chiltern. Plus it gets them the Overground again. Agree 100%. National Express' recent record would indicate that the only way they will increase the number of rail franchises they hold is to take over other TOCs. Obviously, I will eat my words if they win InterCity East Coast! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Olympic Legacy - or lack of. (Reuters) | London Transport | |||
HLOS - Thameslink rumours from Reuters | London Transport | |||
ANNOUNCE: PlanAJourney - The BEST UK Journey Planner | London Transport | |||
Announce - New Oytercard Forum | London Transport | |||
Announce: 'Building London's Victoria Line': BTF on DVD | London Transport |