James Farrar wrote:
On Sun, 2 Sep 2007 20:28:36 +0100, "Graham Harrison"
wrote:

That said, I reckon the 0640 is far too tight. I'd go for an earlier train
and I would seriously consider spending the night at Gatwick. The distance
is longer and the ability to improvise if things do go wrong is less.

Also, some airlines will let you check in the night before.

Which ones?
--
Michael Hoffman

On Mon, 03 Sep 2007 01:24:25 +0100, Michael Hoffman
wrote:

James Farrar wrote:
On Sun, 2 Sep 2007 20:28:36 +0100, "Graham Harrison"
wrote:

That said, I reckon the 0640 is far too tight. I'd go for an earlier train
and I would seriously consider spending the night at Gatwick. The distance
is longer and the ability to improvise if things do go wrong is less.

Also, some airlines will let you check in the night before.

Which ones?

http://www.gatwickairport.com has the information.

James Farrar wrote:
On Mon, 03 Sep 2007 01:24:25 +0100, Michael Hoffman
wrote:

James Farrar wrote:
On Sun, 2 Sep 2007 20:28:36 +0100, "Graham Harrison"
wrote:

That said, I reckon the 0640 is far too tight. I'd go for an earlier train
and I would seriously consider spending the night at Gatwick. The distance
is longer and the ability to improvise if things do go wrong is less.
Also, some airlines will let you check in the night before.
Which ones?

http://www.gatwickairport.com has the information.

For those playing at home, it's at

http://www.gatwickairport.com/portal...0357e120a____/


Wow, BAA's URL structure is as asinine as the rest of the organization.
Alternatively you can try:

http://tinyurl.com/2xbe65
--
Michael Hoffman