London Banter

London Banter (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/forum.php)
-   London Transport (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/london-transport/)
-   -   Shepherd's Bush WLL again (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/london-transport/5631-shepherds-bush-wll-again.html)

Mizter T October 5th 07 03:29 PM

Shepherd's Bush WLL again
 
On 28 Sep, 23:36, (Colin Rosenstiel) wrote:
In article ,

(snip)

But it seems the Wimbledon branch still has Network Rail doing the
signalling (another thread running in uk.t.l), so maybe LU were
only sold the stations?


LU got the route (along with others) so it wasn't privatised in 1994 I
think. LU had run the signalling on the Putney Bridge-East Putney section
for years before then despite it still being BR owned.


The East Putney to Wimbledon section is still signalled and powered by
Network Rail under contract to LUL (or possibly under a contract with
the infraco Metronet now, could well even be some complex three-way
agreement) - presumably it was easier to keep this status-quo than to
change things around.

A (separate) agreement gives running rights to National Rail trains
over this section. Of course operationally this is made easier by the
fact the stretch is signalled by Network Rail.


Colin Rosenstiel October 5th 07 07:25 PM

Shepherd's Bush WLL again
 
In article .com,
(Mizter T) wrote:

The East Putney to Wimbledon section is still signalled and powered by
Network Rail under contract to LUL (or possibly under a contract with
the infraco Metronet now, could well even be some complex three-way
agreement) - presumably it was easier to keep this status-quo than to
change things around.


But not the Putney Bridge-East Putney section which I believe is now
fully integrated into LU practice.

--
Colin Rosenstiel

Mizter T October 5th 07 07:45 PM

Shepherd's Bush WLL again
 
On 5 Oct, 20:25, (Colin Rosenstiel) wrote:
In article .com,

(Mizter T) wrote:
The East Putney to Wimbledon section is still signalled and powered by
Network Rail under contract to LUL (or possibly under a contract with
the infraco Metronet now, could well even be some complex three-way
agreement) - presumably it was easier to keep this status-quo than to
change things around.


But not the Putney Bridge-East Putney section which I believe is now
fully integrated into LU practice.


OK, sure - I have to admit I'm no expert on the line so I wasn't
really thinking that far back. Though to be honest it's not really
something I've ever spent very much time thinking about!

One would, of course, hope that the basics of LU and BR/NR practice
are broadly the same i.e. stopping more than one train being in the
same place at the same time!



All times are GMT. The time now is 05:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk