![]() |
London Underground Ventilation Shafts
On 16 Nov, 12:55, JohnW wrote:
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 22:05:15 -0000, Adrian wrote: The implication is that one can dial 222 1234 within a notional STD code of "0207" AND expect to be connected. I have heard that there are a handful of exchanges within London were that does work. However the standard is now eight digit local numbers within London. Dialing eight digits within STD code "020" will always work. Not if the number is of the form: 020 0123 4567. There are some numbers issued to network service providers, for example, in the 020 0... range that can only be dialled as 11 digits, even from within the 020 area. The recommendation is for them not to use the (020) 0... format when writing the number, since this indicates optional numbers I thought all the London exchanges accepting 7 digits for local routing had been fixed, since how are they to know if the number being dialled is 7 or 8 digits? (123 4567 or 1234 5678) We don't use time-outs. If it did work, and I don't know if it does, it would presumably only work if the first number was one that no 8-digit numbers currently start with. So maybe 222 1234, for example, if there are no 8-digit numbers beginning with 2 (yet). The system never knows whether a number beginning with 0 is 11 digits or some unknowable number of digits in a foreign number until the second 0 is dialled*, so obviously numbers can be resolved as further digits are dialled. *Funny how we say dialled. I wonder when anyone last did that. |
London Underground Ventilation Shafts
Bill Hayles writes:
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 12:49:29 -0800 (PST), Adrian wrote: If I had to take a guess, I would say that, for some countries, telephone area codes will dissappear with a few decades. In Spain, they already have. Ditto for Denmark and Norway. |
London Underground Ventilation Shafts
In message k
"Richard J." wrote: G wrote: On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 05:21:06 +0000, James Farrar wrote: One of the mobile companies -- Vodafone, I think -- that displays the area the mobile is in on some handsets' screens displays 0207 / 0208, too. I put that down to the silly numbering conventions: Large cities (e.g. Birmingham) = 4 digits (0121) Provincial towns = 5 digits (e.g. 01772) '02' numbers (e.g. London, NI, Cardiff) = 3 digits Mobiles = 5 digits Yes, most people seem to group the first five digits of a mobile number (07xxx) together, but I'm not aware of any written convention that says you should. Personally I quote mine as 0787 xxx xxxx because it easier to remember that way. When mobiles first came out the numbers were 10 digits, a group of four, which identified the service company, then 6 digits to identify the individual phone. The first group was to match in with the STD system which used four digits to identify key exchanges. Subsequently they added in an extra digit (7) in second place to give a number of the form 078 xxxx xxxx however most people regarded their individual number as the six digit section so would quote 07850 xxxxxx (in my case) -- Graeme Wall This address is not read, substitute trains for rail. Transport Miscellany at http://www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail/index.html |
London Underground Ventilation Shafts
"Clive D. W. Feather" wrote in message : : In article : : .com, : : Adrian writes : : : The implication is that one can dial : : : 222 1234 within a notional STD code of "0207" AND : : : expect to be connected. I have heard that there are : : : a handful of exchanges within London were that does : : : work. : : : : I would very much doubt that, unless you're talking : : about PBXes. If you can identify one, please let me : : know and I'll ensure it gets fixed. I can dial any number on 0121-25x xxxx with just the last 4 digits ;-) Ivor |
London Underground Ventilation Shafts
"MIG" wrote in message
[snip] : : *Funny how we say dialled. I wonder when anyone last : : did that. About 10 minutes ago, actually, to place a call on CNET (www.ckts.info) using a 2-tone green 706 :-) Ivor |
London Underground Ventilation Shafts
On Nov 14, 1:42 pm, Rob wrote:
Hi Does anyone know where I can find a comprehensive list of London Underground ventilation shafts, used and disused? I went to a lecture recently and they said there were 190 of them in total. That must have been ONE HELL of a lecture! LOROL! |
London Underground Ventilation Shafts
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 10:30:42 +0000, G wrote:
On Nov 14, 1:09 pm, Mizter T wrote: Yes yes it isn't written in the 'approved' format, but thousands (millions?) of Londoners do the same and manage just fine. And many of them get very confused when I tell them my WC1 address and 020 3xxx xxxx number, because to them it's 'not a London number'... This is very transient - I lived in Nottingham when domestic households were first getting 0115-8xxxxxx numbers (where the local number had originally started with a 9) and people got used to the new numbers very quickly. On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 14:46:08 +0000, bin me wrote: Same problem here, in leafy Surrey. Non geographic numbers might seem good to some people, but I don't like them. 020-3 is very much geographic. :-) -- :: Regards, Andy Davidson blog www.andyd.net :: http://www.localphone.com/ - Call Global, Pay Local :: /* opinions and thoughts expressed here are my own */ |
London Underground Ventilation Shafts
On Nov 16, 4:50 pm, Offramp wrote:
On Nov 14, 1:42 pm, Rob wrote: Hi Does anyone know where I can find a comprehensive list of London Underground ventilation shafts, used and disused? I went to a lecture recently and they said there were 190 of them in total. That must have been ONE HELL of a lecture! LOROL! Yes it was David Waboso, head of Engineering at London Underground speaking at the Royal Academy of Engineers - really interesting guy who is so passionate about the future of the Underground. You can check out the lecture here http://www.raeng.org.uk/events/details.htm?Event=208 Rob |
London Underground Ventilation Shafts
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 14:24:07 -0000, "Ivor Jones"
wrote: "MIG" wrote in message [snip] : : *Funny how we say dialled. I wonder when anyone last : : did that. About 10 minutes ago, actually, to place a call on CNET (www.ckts.info) using a 2-tone green 706 :-) A couple of days ago on a red tele 312 (don't ask g). |
London Underground Ventilation Shafts
On 16 Nov, 10:06, G wrote:
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 05:21:06 +0000, James Farrar wrote: One of the mobile companies -- Vodafone, I think -- that displays the area the mobile is in on some handsets' screens displays 0207 / 0208, too. I put that down to the silly numbering conventions: Large cities (e.g. Birmingham) = 4 digits (0121) Provincial towns = 5 digits (e.g. 01772) '02' numbers (e.g. London, NI, Cardiff) = 3 digits Mobiles = 5 digits I don't see that as silly at all - I see that as flexible. In the US they have a totally rigid format of (xxx) xxx xxxx - and it just can't adapt well to rising demand, hence the need to split area codes or add overlay area codes - see an earlier post of mine on this issue upthread, or read it he http://groups.google.co.uk/group/uk....01e56b4a3ae90d |
London Underground Ventilation Shafts
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 12:38:25 GMT, "Richard J."
wrote: G wrote: On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 05:21:06 +0000, James Farrar wrote: One of the mobile companies -- Vodafone, I think -- that displays the area the mobile is in on some handsets' screens displays 0207 / 0208, too. I put that down to the silly numbering conventions: Large cities (e.g. Birmingham) = 4 digits (0121) Provincial towns = 5 digits (e.g. 01772) '02' numbers (e.g. London, NI, Cardiff) = 3 digits Mobiles = 5 digits Yes, most people seem to group the first five digits of a mobile number (07xxx) together, but I'm not aware of any written convention that says you should. Personally I quote mine as 0787 xxx xxxx because it easier to remember that way. Hmm. Mine starts 07976, after which I find the natural place in the speaking rhythm to leave a pause. I presume 0787x would be the same. Unless your number is something like 0787 877 8787 (and a prize to the first person to spot the allusion!) |
London Underground Ventilation Shafts
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 05:06:19 -0800 (PST), MIG
wrote: *Funny how we say dialled. I wonder when anyone last did that. Well, we have the Royal Mail, which delivers the post. And the US has the Postal Service, which (naturally) delivers the mail! :) |
London Underground Ventilation Shafts
"James Farrar" wrote in message
... On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 12:38:25 GMT, "Richard J." wrote: Yes, most people seem to group the first five digits of a mobile number (07xxx) together, but I'm not aware of any written convention that says you should. Personally I quote mine as 0787 xxx xxxx because it easier to remember that way. I tend to split mine as 07748 xxx xxx so as to agree with the convention for landline numbers that you (usually) have a 5-digit code followed by a 6-digit number that is usually say in groups of three digits. I find it more difficult to absorb numbers in pairs or in fours. At least in the UK we don't use the absurd convention of saying the pairs as if they were tens and units: thirty-eight, twenty-four, thirty-six. Germany is particularly ludicrous because numbers in German are said backwards in "four-and-twenty blackbirds" notation so as someone reads out a number you don't even write down the digits in the order that you hear them. Watching a German write down a phone number is most amusing because many write down the digits by taking two steps forward and one step back, rather than waiting to hear the whole sechs-und-dreizig and then writing down a 3 (dreizig) followed by a 6 (sechs). Hmm. Mine starts 07976, after which I find the natural place in the speaking rhythm to leave a pause. I presume 0787x would be the same. Unless your number is something like 0787 877 8787 (and a prize to the first person to spot the allusion!) Hmmm. I don't the allusion. Am I going to kick myself when someone explains it? Is it a number that makes a word on a calculator display if you turn it upside down - like 0553 or 77345. |
London Underground Ventilation Shafts
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, James Farrar wrote:
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 12:38:25 GMT, "Richard J." wrote: G wrote: On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 05:21:06 +0000, James Farrar wrote: One of the mobile companies -- Vodafone, I think -- that displays the area the mobile is in on some handsets' screens displays 0207 / 0208, too. I put that down to the silly numbering conventions: Large cities (e.g. Birmingham) = 4 digits (0121) Provincial towns = 5 digits (e.g. 01772) '02' numbers (e.g. London, NI, Cardiff) = 3 digits Mobiles = 5 digits Yes, most people seem to group the first five digits of a mobile number (07xxx) together, but I'm not aware of any written convention that says you should. Personally I quote mine as 0787 xxx xxxx because it easier to remember that way. Hmm. Mine starts 07976, after which I find the natural place in the speaking rhythm to leave a pause. I presume 0787x would be the same. I do the same - 07960, then six digits. In my case, the six digits are of the pattern XAXBXC, with each pair starting with the same digit, so this group has a strong natural cadence, reinforcing its separateness from the preceding digits. Unless your number is something like 0787 877 8787 (and a prize to the first person to spot the allusion!) Live And Kicking! tom -- I am become Life, destroyer of worlds |
London Underground Ventilation Shafts
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Mortimer wrote:
At least in the UK we don't use the absurd convention of saying the pairs as if they were tens and units: thirty-eight, twenty-four, thirty-six. I do, but only because my number is like that - it looks a bit like 272829, which reads nicely as twenty-seven, twenty-eight, twenty-nine. Germany is particularly ludicrous because numbers in German are said backwards in "four-and-twenty blackbirds" notation so as someone reads out a number you don't even write down the digits in the order that you hear them. Watching a German write down a phone number is most amusing because many write down the digits by taking two steps forward and one step back, rather than waiting to hear the whole sechs-und-dreizig and then writing down a 3 (dreizig) followed by a 6 (sechs). This is indeed a highly entertaining fact. tom -- I am become Life, destroyer of worlds |
London Underground Ventilation Shafts
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, BRB Class 465 wrote:
7) Grass Area 14 Which what where now? tom -- I am become Life, destroyer of worlds |
London Underground Ventilation Shafts
"Tom Anderson" wrote in message
h.li... On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Mortimer wrote: At least in the UK we don't use the absurd convention of saying the pairs as if they were tens and units: thirty-eight, twenty-four, thirty-six. I do, but only because my number is like that - it looks a bit like 272829, which reads nicely as twenty-seven, twenty-eight, twenty-nine. I've obviously been over-indoctrinated by the 3-digit police, because I didn't spot the pattern - I'd have said it as two-seven-two, eight-two-nine. But now you point it out to me, I can see the grouping, though I'd still say two-seven, two-eight, two-nine. |
London Underground Ventilation Shafts
In message
Mizter T wrote: On 16 Nov, 10:06, G wrote: On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 05:21:06 +0000, James Farrar wrote: One of the mobile companies -- Vodafone, I think -- that displays the area the mobile is in on some handsets' screens displays 0207 / 0208, too. I put that down to the silly numbering conventions: Large cities (e.g. Birmingham) = 4 digits (0121) Provincial towns = 5 digits (e.g. 01772) '02' numbers (e.g. London, NI, Cardiff) = 3 digits 02 numbers actually come out at 5 digits eg Southampton 02380, Portsmouth 02392 Mobiles = 5 digits Actually they all end up as XXX XXXX XXXX if you work it out. -- Graeme Wall This address is not read, substitute trains for rail. Transport Miscellany at http://www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail/index.html |
London Underground Ventilation Shafts
On 16 Nov, 18:46, James Farrar wrote:
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 12:38:25 GMT, "Richard J." wrote: G wrote: On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 05:21:06 +0000, James Farrar wrote: One of the mobile companies -- Vodafone, I think -- that displays the area the mobile is in on some handsets' screens displays 0207 / 0208, too. I put that down to the silly numbering conventions: Large cities (e.g. Birmingham) = 4 digits (0121) Provincial towns = 5 digits (e.g. 01772) '02' numbers (e.g. London, NI, Cardiff) = 3 digits Mobiles = 5 digits Yes, most people seem to group the first five digits of a mobile number (07xxx) together, but I'm not aware of any written convention that says you should. Personally I quote mine as 0787 xxx xxxx because it easier to remember that way. Hmm. Mine starts 07976, after which I find the natural place in the speaking rhythm to leave a pause. I presume 0787x would be the same. Unless your number is something like 0787 877 8787 (and a prize to the first person to spot the allusion!) That prize is going... going... going... to me! |
London Underground Ventilation Shafts
On 16 Nov, 19:04, "Mortimer" wrote:
"James Farrar" wrote in message (snip) Unless your number is something like 0787 877 8787 (and a prize to the first person to spot the allusion!) Hmmm. I don't the allusion. Am I going to kick myself when someone explains it? Is it a number that makes a word on a calculator display if you turn it upside down - like 0553 or 77345. You might (Live and) Kick(iing) yourself, but the number has a more archaic roots than that. See my other (winning?) post. |
London Underground Ventilation Shafts
On 16 Nov, 19:30, Tom Anderson wrote:
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, BRB Class 465 wrote: 7) Grass Area 14 Which what where now? tom It's TfL's own Area 51. Now shush, otherwise Commissioner Hendy's low- vis clad Praedtorian Street Guard heavies might come knocking in the midst of the night and take you away on a somewhat more ominous type of unresolved journey... |
London Underground Ventilation Shafts
"Graeme Wall" wrote in message ... In message Mizter T wrote: On 16 Nov, 10:06, G wrote: On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 05:21:06 +0000, James Farrar wrote: One of the mobile companies -- Vodafone, I think -- that displays the area the mobile is in on some handsets' screens displays 0207 / 0208, too. I put that down to the silly numbering conventions: Large cities (e.g. Birmingham) = 4 digits (0121) Provincial towns = 5 digits (e.g. 01772) '02' numbers (e.g. London, NI, Cardiff) = 3 digits 02 numbers actually come out at 5 digits eg Southampton 02380, Portsmouth 02392 That is a weird one, Clive DW was going to try and get to the bottom of it for me, but the idea was surely that Southampton and Portsmouth are both 023 area code, with 80nnnnnn and 92nnnnnn numbers. But even the BT dialling code site shows up 02380 and 02392 as separate codes, even though you have to dial 8 numbers for local calls? (I'm in 01489, so have 023 areas on both sides - weird) Paul |
London Underground Ventilation Shafts
"Graeme Wall" wrote in message
... In message Mizter T wrote: On 16 Nov, 10:06, G wrote: On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 05:21:06 +0000, James Farrar wrote: One of the mobile companies -- Vodafone, I think -- that displays the area the mobile is in on some handsets' screens displays 0207 / 0208, too. I put that down to the silly numbering conventions: Large cities (e.g. Birmingham) = 4 digits (0121) Provincial towns = 5 digits (e.g. 01772) '02' numbers (e.g. London, NI, Cardiff) = 3 digits 02 numbers actually come out at 5 digits eg Southampton 02380, Portsmouth 02392 But they don't. If a caller on 023 9257 1234 wants to call 023 9257 2345, they *can't* dial 57 2345, but they *can* dial 9257 2345. Similarly if they want to call 023 8065 4321, they can dial 8065 4321. There are *not* area codes of 02380 and 02392; there is an area code of 023. -- David Biddulph |
He apologizes for a flippant answer - His thoughts on the subject sofar - He discourses about the change in subjects
On Nov 16, 5:19 pm, Rob wrote:
On Nov 16, 4:50 pm, Offramp wrote: On Nov 14, 1:42 pm, Rob wrote: That must have been ONE HELL of a lecture! LOROL! Yes it was David Waboso, head of Engineering at London Underground speaking at the Royal Academy of Engineers - really interesting guy who is so passionate about the future of the Underground. You can check out the lecture here http://www.raeng.org.uk/events/details.htm?Event=208 Sorry to sound flippant. I've actually found this thread very interesting! Strange how it is interwoven with the dialling codes thread. |
London Underground Ventilation Shafts
Paul Scott wrote:
"Graeme Wall" wrote in message ... In message Mizter T wrote: On 16 Nov, 10:06, G wrote: On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 05:21:06 +0000, James Farrar wrote: One of the mobile companies -- Vodafone, I think -- that displays the area the mobile is in on some handsets' screens displays 0207 / 0208, too. I put that down to the silly numbering conventions: Large cities (e.g. Birmingham) = 4 digits (0121) Provincial towns = 5 digits (e.g. 01772) '02' numbers (e.g. London, NI, Cardiff) = 3 digits 02 numbers actually come out at 5 digits eg Southampton 02380, Portsmouth 02392 That is a weird one, Clive DW was going to try and get to the bottom of it for me, but the idea was surely that Southampton and Portsmouth are both 023 area code, with 80nnnnnn and 92nnnnnn numbers. But even the BT dialling code site shows up 02380 and 02392 as separate codes, even though you have to dial 8 numbers for local calls? (I'm in 01489, so have 023 areas on both sides - weird) They key factor as to where the are code ends and the local number starts is what you can dial without dialling the full number. From any (023) number you can dial an 8 digit number for any other (023) number. So (023) is the area code. Just odd that it is two areas, blame OFTEL, as was. -- Adrian Kennard, on his Mac... Andrews & Arnold Ltd. Communications specialists. www.aaisp.net.uk New UK Wide 03 phone numbers available now. |
London Underground Ventilation Shafts
"Rev Adrian Kennard" wrote in message ... Paul Scott wrote: "Graeme Wall" wrote in message ... 02 numbers actually come out at 5 digits eg Southampton 02380, Portsmouth 02392 That is a weird one, Clive DW was going to try and get to the bottom of it for me, but the idea was surely that Southampton and Portsmouth are both 023 area code, with 80nnnnnn and 92nnnnnn numbers. But even the BT dialling code site shows up 02380 and 02392 as separate codes, even though you have to dial 8 numbers for local calls? (I'm in 01489, so have 023 areas on both sides - weird) They key factor as to where the are code ends and the local number starts is what you can dial without dialling the full number. From any (023) number you can dial an 8 digit number for any other (023) number. So (023) is the area code. Just odd that it is two areas, blame OFTEL, as was. I reckon the long term plan is that 023 will become the Solent area, and the codes inbetween (geographically speaking) will disappear when they need to become 8 digit numbers. BTW the BT dialling code search recognises 023 ok since I last checked, so that problem has gone away... Paul |
London Underground Ventilation Shafts
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 19:40:43 -0000, Mortimer wrote:
"Tom Anderson" wrote in message th.li... On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Mortimer wrote: At least in the UK we don't use the absurd convention of saying the pairs as if they were tens and units: thirty-eight, twenty-four, thirty-six. I do, but only because my number is like that - it looks a bit like 272829, which reads nicely as twenty-seven, twenty-eight, twenty-nine. I've obviously been over-indoctrinated by the 3-digit police, because I didn't spot the pattern - I'd have said it as two-seven-two, eight-two-nine. But now you point it out to me, I can see the grouping, though I'd still say two-seven, two-eight, two-nine. My mobile number fits the pattern of 823636 (different numbers though!). I tend to read it out as eight-two, three-six-three-six. -- -- Michael "Soruk" McConnell Eridani Star System MailStripper - http://www.MailStripper.eu/ - SMTP spam filter Mail Me Anywhere - http://www.MailMeAnywhere.com/ - Mobile email Second Number - http://secondnumber.matrixnetwork.co.uk/ |
London Underground Ventilation Shafts
"Soruk" wrote in message
... On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 19:40:43 -0000, Mortimer wrote: "Tom Anderson" wrote in message rth.li... On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Mortimer wrote: At least in the UK we don't use the absurd convention of saying the pairs as if they were tens and units: thirty-eight, twenty-four, thirty-six. I do, but only because my number is like that - it looks a bit like 272829, which reads nicely as twenty-seven, twenty-eight, twenty-nine. I've obviously been over-indoctrinated by the 3-digit police, because I didn't spot the pattern - I'd have said it as two-seven-two, eight-two-nine. But now you point it out to me, I can see the grouping, though I'd still say two-seven, two-eight, two-nine. My mobile number fits the pattern of 823636 (different numbers though!). I tend to read it out as eight-two, three-six-three-six. The other oddity is when a number has been extended by having additional digits added to the beginning. My parents' number was originally four digits and then had a 61 added to the beginning. Thirty years later, they still say 61 1234 [fictitious number] rather than 611 234, breaking the number with a definite pause between the new prefix and the original number! Likewise my grandpa's number had a 2 added at the time of Phoneday when the code for Leeds changed, he always answered it as "Leeds 2 [pause] 123 456". How did we stray off the subject of LU ventilation shafts? ;-) |
London Underground Ventilation Shafts
On Nov 16, 12:34 pm, Rev Adrian Kennard wrote:
Paul Scott wrote: "Graeme Wall" wrote in message ... In message Mizter T wrote: On 16 Nov, 10:06, G wrote: On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 05:21:06 +0000, James Farrar wrote: One of the mobile companies -- Vodafone, I think -- that displays the area the mobile is in on some handsets' screens displays 0207 / 0208, too. I put that down to the silly numbering conventions: Large cities (e.g. Birmingham) = 4 digits (0121) Provincial towns = 5 digits (e.g. 01772) '02' numbers (e.g. London, NI, Cardiff) = 3 digits 02 numbers actually come out at 5 digits eg Southampton 02380, Portsmouth 02392 That is a weird one, Clive DW was going to try and get to the bottom of it for me, but the idea was surely that Southampton and Portsmouth are both 023 area code, with 80nnnnnn and 92nnnnnn numbers. But even the BT dialling code site shows up 02380 and 02392 as separate codes, even though you have to dial 8 numbers for local calls? (I'm in 01489, so have 023 areas on both sides - weird) They key factor as to where the are code ends and the local number starts is what you can dial without dialling the full number. From any (023) number you can dial an 8 digit number for any other (023) number. So (023) is the area code. Just odd that it is two areas, blame OFTEL, as was. -- Adrian Kennard, on his Mac... Andrews & Arnold Ltd. Communications specialists. www.aaisp.net.uk New UK Wide 03 phone numbers available now.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Indeed so. My number starts 023-9200 nnnn. Dialling 00nnnn would look to the equipment like the miss-dialled international number. Presumably the rest of the Solent area was intended to eventually become part of 023. Who knows what will happen now that Offcom have changed policy. Adrian |
London Underground Ventilation Shafts
In message
"David Biddulph" groups [at] biddulph.org.uk wrote: "Graeme Wall" wrote in message ... In message Mizter T wrote: On 16 Nov, 10:06, G wrote: On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 05:21:06 +0000, James Farrar wrote: One of the mobile companies -- Vodafone, I think -- that displays the area the mobile is in on some handsets' screens displays 0207 / 0208, too. I put that down to the silly numbering conventions: Large cities (e.g. Birmingham) = 4 digits (0121) Provincial towns = 5 digits (e.g. 01772) '02' numbers (e.g. London, NI, Cardiff) = 3 digits 02 numbers actually come out at 5 digits eg Southampton 02380, Portsmouth 02392 But they don't. If a caller on 023 9257 1234 wants to call 023 9257 2345, they *can't* dial 57 2345, but they *can* dial 9257 2345. Similarly if they want to call 023 8065 4321, they can dial 8065 4321. There are *not* area codes of 02380 and 02392; there is an area code of 023. Tell that to BT, they insist they are seperate codes, see your phone book for details. I suspect it is to do with the well known antipathy between the two ports, neither side will admit they share an area code with the other. -- Graeme Wall This address is not read, substitute trains for rail. Transport Miscellany at http://www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail/index.html |
London Underground Ventilation Shafts
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 22:10:22 +0000, Graeme Wall
wrote: In message "David Biddulph" groups [at] biddulph.org.uk wrote: "Graeme Wall" wrote in message ... In message Mizter T wrote: On 16 Nov, 10:06, G wrote: On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 05:21:06 +0000, James Farrar wrote: One of the mobile companies -- Vodafone, I think -- that displays the area the mobile is in on some handsets' screens displays 0207 / 0208, too. I put that down to the silly numbering conventions: Large cities (e.g. Birmingham) = 4 digits (0121) Provincial towns = 5 digits (e.g. 01772) '02' numbers (e.g. London, NI, Cardiff) = 3 digits 02 numbers actually come out at 5 digits eg Southampton 02380, Portsmouth 02392 But they don't. If a caller on 023 9257 1234 wants to call 023 9257 2345, they *can't* dial 57 2345, but they *can* dial 9257 2345. Similarly if they want to call 023 8065 4321, they can dial 8065 4321. There are *not* area codes of 02380 and 02392; there is an area code of 023. Tell that to BT, they insist they are seperate codes, see your phone book for details. I suspect it is to do with the well known antipathy between the two ports, neither side will admit they share an area code with the other. The two places are in different charging groups aren't they ? Issuing different STD codes to places which are in different charging groups but the same numbering scheme is nothing new; it makes things slightly less confusing than IIRC the arrangement in 0191-land where calling from the surrounding area to an adjacent 0191- exchange is a local call but calling to the far side is a national call. |
London Underground Ventilation Shafts
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 19:18:11 +0000, Tom Anderson
wrote: Unless your number is something like 0787 877 8787 (and a prize to the first person to spot the allusion!) Live And Kicking! Indeed! Going Live! used 081 811 8181 from the 071/081 split (previously it had used 01 811 8055, inherited from Saturday Superstore (and, I believe, from Multi-Coloured Swap Shop before it, although that was before my time). 081 811 8181 then passed to L&K, becoming 0181 811 8181 on PhONE Day. [Mostly from memory; how sad am I? ;) ] |
London Underground Ventilation Shafts
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Mizter T wrote:
On 16 Nov, 19:04, "Mortimer" wrote: "James Farrar" wrote in message Unless your number is something like 0787 877 8787 (and a prize to the first person to spot the allusion!) Hmmm. I don't the allusion. Am I going to kick myself when someone explains it? Is it a number that makes a word on a calculator display if you turn it upside down - like 0553 or 77345. You might (Live and) Kick(iing) yourself, but the number has a more archaic roots than that. See my other (winning?) post. My timestamp: Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 19:18:11 +0000 Your timestamp: Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 12:10:19 -0800 (PST) I think yours works out to 20:10:19 God's own Mean Time. Provided that these times are meaningful and trustworthy, i'm afraid YAR BOO SUCKS TO YOU. tom -- Throw bricks at lawyers if you can! |
London Underground Ventilation Shafts
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Mortimer wrote:
"Soruk" wrote in message ... On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 19:40:43 -0000, Mortimer wrote: "Tom Anderson" wrote in message h.li... On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Mortimer wrote: At least in the UK we don't use the absurd convention of saying the pairs as if they were tens and units: thirty-eight, twenty-four, thirty-six. I do, but only because my number is like that - it looks a bit like 272829, which reads nicely as twenty-seven, twenty-eight, twenty-nine. I've obviously been over-indoctrinated by the 3-digit police, because I didn't spot the pattern - I'd have said it as two-seven-two, eight-two-nine. But now you point it out to me, I can see the grouping, though I'd still say two-seven, two-eight, two-nine. My mobile number fits the pattern of 823636 (different numbers though!). I tend to read it out as eight-two, three-six-three-six. The other oddity is when a number has been extended by having additional digits added to the beginning. My parents' number was originally four digits and then had a 61 added to the beginning. Thirty years later, they still say 61 1234 [fictitious number] rather than 611 234, breaking the number with a definite pause between the new prefix and the original number! Likewise my grandpa's number had a 2 added at the time of Phoneday when the code for Leeds changed, he always answered it as "Leeds 2 [pause] 123 456". Sounds like a football score! Although where you'd find a team called 12345, i don't know. My mum used to say "Wivenhoe 1234" for years after we got regularised into the Colchester dialling code. tom -- Throw bricks at lawyers if you can! |
London Underground Ventilation Shafts
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007, James Farrar wrote:
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 19:18:11 +0000, Tom Anderson wrote: Unless your number is something like 0787 877 8787 (and a prize to the first person to spot the allusion!) Live And Kicking! Indeed! Going Live! used 081 811 8181 from the 071/081 split (previously it had used 01 811 8055, inherited from Saturday Superstore (and, I believe, from Multi-Coloured Swap Shop before it, although that was before my time). 081 811 8181 then passed to L&K, becoming 0181 811 8181 on PhONE Day. [Mostly from memory; how sad am I? ;) ] Never mind that; for census purposes, do you consider yourself a dialling code loony or a children's television loony? :) tom -- Throw bricks at lawyers if you can! |
London Underground Ventilation Shafts
"Graeme Wall" wrote in message
... In message "David Biddulph" groups [at] biddulph.org.uk wrote: "Graeme Wall" wrote in message ... In message Mizter T wrote: On 16 Nov, 10:06, G wrote: On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 05:21:06 +0000, James Farrar wrote: One of the mobile companies -- Vodafone, I think -- that displays the area the mobile is in on some handsets' screens displays 0207 / 0208, too. I put that down to the silly numbering conventions: Large cities (e.g. Birmingham) = 4 digits (0121) Provincial towns = 5 digits (e.g. 01772) '02' numbers (e.g. London, NI, Cardiff) = 3 digits 02 numbers actually come out at 5 digits eg Southampton 02380, Portsmouth 02392 But they don't. If a caller on 023 9257 1234 wants to call 023 9257 2345, they *can't* dial 57 2345, but they *can* dial 9257 2345. Similarly if they want to call 023 8065 4321, they can dial 8065 4321. There are *not* area codes of 02380 and 02392; there is an area code of 023. Tell that to BT, they insist they are seperate codes, see your phone book for details. I suspect it is to do with the well known antipathy between the two ports, neither side will admit they share an area code with the other. I've checked my phone book, and both Portsmouth and Southampton (and numbers in the area) are shown as 023. -- David Biddulph |
London Underground Ventilation Shafts
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 02:39:57 +0000, Tom Anderson
wrote: On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Mortimer wrote: "Soruk" wrote in message ... On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 19:40:43 -0000, Mortimer wrote: "Tom Anderson" wrote in message h.li... On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Mortimer wrote: At least in the UK we don't use the absurd convention of saying the pairs as if they were tens and units: thirty-eight, twenty-four, thirty-six. I do, but only because my number is like that - it looks a bit like 272829, which reads nicely as twenty-seven, twenty-eight, twenty-nine. I've obviously been over-indoctrinated by the 3-digit police, because I didn't spot the pattern - I'd have said it as two-seven-two, eight-two-nine. But now you point it out to me, I can see the grouping, though I'd still say two-seven, two-eight, two-nine. My mobile number fits the pattern of 823636 (different numbers though!). I tend to read it out as eight-two, three-six-three-six. The other oddity is when a number has been extended by having additional digits added to the beginning. My parents' number was originally four digits and then had a 61 added to the beginning. Thirty years later, they still say 61 1234 [fictitious number] rather than 611 234, breaking the number with a definite pause between the new prefix and the original number! Likewise my grandpa's number had a 2 added at the time of Phoneday when the code for Leeds changed, he always answered it as "Leeds 2 [pause] 123 456". Sounds like a football score! Although where you'd find a team called 12345, i don't know. Wolves 8 A cheese roll and had a cup of tea 2. |
London Underground Ventilation Shafts
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 21:28:46 -0000, "Mortimer" wrote:
How did we stray off the subject of LU ventilation shafts? ;-) I think that was my fault :) |
London Underground Ventilation Shafts
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 01:31:16 +0000, James Farrar
wrote: Going Live! used 081 811 8181 from the 071/081 split (previously it had used 01 811 8055, inherited from Saturday Superstore (and, I believe, from Multi-Coloured Swap Shop before it, although that was before my time). 081 811 8181 then passed to L&K, becoming 0181 811 8181 on PhONE Day. Very fortunate for the BBC that the new London code that applied to them was 0(1)81... I assume it's 09something expensive these days... Neil -- Neil Williams Put my first name before the at to reply. |
London Underground Ventilation Shafts
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 19:49:58 +0000, Graeme Wall
wrote: Actually they all end up as XXX XXXX XXXX if you work it out. Though the dialling code on a mobile is essentially redundant, other than that all mobile numbers start 07, as it's not as if you can dial a shortened number from one. Neil -- Neil Williams Put my first name before the at to reply. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:15 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk