London Banter

London Banter (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/forum.php)
-   London Transport (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/london-transport/)
-   -   Dead end (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/london-transport/5858-dead-end.html)

John Rowland November 14th 07 08:23 PM

Dead end
 

I found a road today (Knapp Road E3) with a standard T-shaped "No Through
Road" sign, and underneath were the words "Except Access". Every time I try
to figure out what that might mean, my head turns into a Moebius strip.

Whose job is it to decide which signs go where? Is it a
pay-peanuts-get-monkeys job, or has the chap got some qualification?



David Morgan November 14th 07 08:38 PM

Dead end
 

"John Rowland" wrote in message
...

I found a road today (Knapp Road E3) with a standard T-shaped "No Through
Road" sign, and underneath were the words "Except Access". Every time I
try to figure out what that might mean, my head turns into a Moebius
strip.


Don't know the road myself - is it physically possible to drive in one end
and out of the other? Perhaps it means that you are only permitted to do
this if making a delivery or visiting a resident. Difficult to enforce
though.

--
David



Sam Nelson November 14th 07 08:52 PM

Dead end
 
In article ,
says...
I found a road today (Knapp Road E3) with a standard T-shaped "No Through
Road" sign, and underneath were the words "Except Access". Every time I try
to figure out what that might mean, my head turns into a Moebius strip.


At a guess, the road turns into a road that's private and unadopted.

Whose job is it to decide which signs go where? Is it a
pay-peanuts-get-monkeys job, or has the chap got some qualification?


I suspect there are good ones and bad ones, same as anywhere else.
--
SAm.

Mark Goodge November 14th 07 09:05 PM

Dead end
 
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 21:23:55 -0000, John Rowland put finger to
keyboard and typed:


I found a road today (Knapp Road E3) with a standard T-shaped "No Through
Road" sign, and underneath were the words "Except Access". Every time I try
to figure out what that might mean, my head turns into a Moebius strip.


That's not entirely stupid. Assuming you have something like this:

| |
A ------------------B----------------C
| |

where the lines are roads, then if the section B-C is "no vehicles
except for access", then at junction A it would be entirely true to
say that A-B is "no through road except for access", and at junction A
would be the sign you describe.

A typical situation where this might occur is where the section A-B is
a normal-sized road, suitable for all traffic, but between B and C it
becomes extremely narrow and/or twisty. Another situation would be
where B-C runs through a housing estate but A-B serves an industrial
estate just on the A side of B, and the authorities want to exclude
industrial estate traffic from the housing estate - forcing it to use
access A at all times - while still permitting residents of the
housing estate to enter and leave via either A or C.

Mark
--
Blog: http://Mark.Goodge.co.uk Photos: http://www.goodge.co.uk
"Emotions run deep as oceans"

Richard J.[_2_] November 14th 07 09:40 PM

Dead end
 
John Rowland wrote:
I found a road today (Knapp Road E3) with a standard T-shaped "No
Through Road" sign, and underneath were the words "Except Access".
Every time I try to figure out what that might mean, my head turns
into a Moebius strip.


According to Streetmap, when going west along Knapp Road, just after the
railway bridge, the road becomes Cantrell Road, but there's a line
across the road suggesting some sort of access restriction. Similarly
at the other end of Cantrell Road, where it meets Bow Common Lane, there
is another line across it. So I assume that Cantrell Road is
effectively pedestrianised except for access, with either some sort of
restricted-access barrier at each end or just No Motor Vehicles signs
with "except for access" plates.

If so, the No Through Road Except for Access sign is reasonably logical,
except that the only qualifying plate allowed on a No Through Road sign
is "except cycles". So it's either an unlawful sign or has special
permission from the DfT.
--
Richard J.
(to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address)


tim \(not at home\) November 14th 07 10:08 PM

Dead end
 

"David Morgan" wrote in
message ...

"John Rowland" wrote in message
...

I found a road today (Knapp Road E3) with a standard T-shaped "No Through
Road" sign, and underneath were the words "Except Access". Every time I
try to figure out what that might mean, my head turns into a Moebius
strip.


Don't know the road myself - is it physically possible to drive in one end
and out of the other? Perhaps it means that you are only permitted to do
this if making a delivery or visiting a resident.


I know of some roads like this.

IIRC they aren't posted as a normal no through roads, but have signs that
make the exact rule clear.

Difficult to enforce though.


They just sit a plod at each end when they have nothing better to do.

tim



JNugent November 15th 07 05:38 PM

Dead end
 
David Morgan wrote:
"John Rowland" wrote in message
...

I found a road today (Knapp Road E3) with a standard T-shaped "No Through
Road" sign, and underneath were the words "Except Access". Every time I
try to figure out what that might mean, my head turns into a Moebius
strip.



Don't know the road myself - is it physically possible to drive in one end
and out of the other? Perhaps it means that you are only permitted to do
this if making a delivery or visiting a resident. Difficult to enforce
though.


http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=q&hl=en&time=&date=&ttype=&q=Knapp+Rd,+Towe r+Hamlets,+London+E3,+United+Kingdom&sll=51.994087 ,-0.734502&sspn=0.079803,0.160675&ie=UTF8&cd=2&geoco de=0,51.521758,-0.020599&ll=51.521441,-0.020792&spn=0.01008,0.020084&z=16&om=1

Or:

http://tinyurl.com/37fq6x

Look at it in satellite mode at highest resolution.

It looks as though it should be a through route. If it's not, it must
have been artificially blocked with some of those concrete blocks the
council committee chairman's brother sells (allegedly).


umpston November 16th 07 12:32 AM

Dead end
 
On Nov 14, 10:40 pm, "Richard J." wrote:
John Rowland wrote:
I found a road today (Knapp Road E3) with a standard T-shaped "No
Through Road" sign, and underneath were the words "Except Access".
Every time I try to figure out what that might mean, my head turns
into a Moebius strip.


According to Streetmap, when going west along Knapp Road, just after the
railway bridge, the road becomes Cantrell Road, but there's a line
across the road suggesting some sort of access restriction. Similarly
at the other end of Cantrell Road, where it meets Bow Common Lane, there
is another line across it. So I assume that Cantrell Road is
effectively pedestrianised except for access, with either some sort of
restricted-access barrier at each end or just No Motor Vehicles signs
with "except for access" plates.

If so, the No Through Road Except for Access sign is reasonably logical,
except that the only qualifying plate allowed on a No Through Road sign
is "except cycles". So it's either an unlawful sign or has special
permission from the DfT.
--
Richard J.
(to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address)


I think it must be a mistake since the DfT usually grant special
authorisation for variation of signs only if there is no existing
authorised sign or marking for the desired meaning. The correct sign
for this purpose would be the No Motor Vehicles (or no vehicles) signs
with 'except for access' plates. Or, if the width of the road is the
issue, "unsuitable for wide vehicles" could be used.

Richard J.[_2_] November 16th 07 07:21 AM

Dead end
 
umpston wrote:
On Nov 14, 10:40 pm, "Richard J."
wrote:
John Rowland wrote:
I found a road today (Knapp Road E3) with a standard T-shaped "No
Through Road" sign, and underneath were the words "Except Access".
Every time I try to figure out what that might mean, my head turns
into a Moebius strip.


According to Streetmap, when going west along Knapp Road, just
after the railway bridge, the road becomes Cantrell Road, but
there's a line across the road suggesting some sort of access
restriction. Similarly at the other end of Cantrell Road, where
it meets Bow Common Lane, there is another line across it. So I
assume that Cantrell Road is effectively pedestrianised except for
access, with either some sort of restricted-access barrier at each
end or just No Motor Vehicles signs with "except for access"
plates.

If so, the No Through Road Except for Access sign is reasonably
logical, except that the only qualifying plate allowed on a No
Through Road sign is "except cycles". So it's either an unlawful
sign or has special permission from the DfT.
--
Richard J.
(to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address)


I think it must be a mistake since the DfT usually grant special
authorisation for variation of signs only if there is no existing
authorised sign or marking for the desired meaning. The correct
sign for this purpose would be the No Motor Vehicles (or no
vehicles) signs with 'except for access' plates. Or, if the width
of the road is the issue, "unsuitable for wide vehicles" could be
used.


"No Motor Vehicles except for access" would be correct at the western
end of Knapp Road where the restriction starts, but not at the other
end, where just an advance warning is needed.
--
Richard J.
(to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address)


Offramp November 17th 07 05:28 AM

Dead end
 
On Nov 14, 9:23 pm, "John Rowland"
wrote:
I found a road today (Knapp Road E3) with a standard T-shaped "No Through
Road" sign, and underneath were the words "Except Access". Every time I try
to figure out what that might mean, my head turns into a Moebius strip.

Whose job is it to decide which signs go where? Is it a
pay-peanuts-get-monkeys job, or has the chap got some qualification?


What happens if you do an AA route search from one end to the other?


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk