Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 22 Dec, 21:29, Tom Page wrote:
On 22 Dec, 20:16, Mr Thant wrote: On 22 Dec, 19:50, wrote: It is a legal requirement that new works and any sort of upgrade must be DDA compliant (hence, for example, the tendency not to "refurbish" rolling stock, which would require DDA compliance, but to "refresh"), so something will have to be done to make the stations DDA compliant, which with the exception of New Cross and Canada Water, they are presently not. And Wapping, in particular, is very, very cramped, so it would be very difficult to carry out these sorts of works and maintain access to the station. My understanding is the works planned fall under "refreshment" type rules and hence no new lifts etc will be provided at existing stations. The various future maps consistently show them as remaining non-accessible: http://www.bbc.co.uk/london/pdf/tube...www.campaignfo...... U --http://londonconnections.blogspot.com/ A blog about transport projects in London I'm not even sure that it's true that major works do need to be lift- accessible. I thought the requirement was that a company had to make reasonable efforts - if the cost was grossly disproportionate to the benefits I thought a full-accessibility scheme was not required. Anyway, as Mr Thant says, I don't think there's much work at all happening at either Wapping or Rotherhithe stations - the bricks and mortar of the stations (so I thought) will remain completely unchanged. I'm sure signage will be replaced, and I imagine things will be cleaned, but neither of these changes would be sufficient to count as a refurb. Tom That's certainly my understanding. All this talk of the DDA is, I think, a complete red-herring. AIUI the issue at Rotherhithe and Wapping has been with safety as opposed to accessibility (that's accessibility in the DDA sense, i.e. for those whose mobility is impaired). Both stations operated with a derogation order (or some such similar bureaucratic device) from the Railway Inspectorate as they fell short of the normal safety standards for underground stations. I believe the specific issue was that there was no secondary exit or means of escape from these stations (perhaps a particularly important issue given that the existing starircases were a bit steep). This derogation order could be revoked at any time should the Inspectorate have felt the situation was dangerous enough to merit doing so. So Wapping and Rotherhithe were originally not confirmed to be stations on the new extended ELL. Then interestingly there was an announcement that they would be included in ELLX phase 1, but their future under ELLX phase 2 was uncertain. I don't quite understand the logic behind this. Perhaps this was because the number of people using these stations, or (and maybe this makes more sense) the number of passengers aboard the ELLX trains that past through these stations, was predicted to rise once phase 2 was completed (an bear in mind that at this time the extension through to Highbury & Islington was part of phase 2). Then in August 2004 the Mayor announced that both Wapping and Rotherhithe were to remain open: http://www.london.gov.uk/view_press_...releaseid=4162 I'm sure I read somewhere of talk that keeping these stations open was possible because new emergency exits (i.e. alternative staircases) will be constructed at them both. I think I can see how this could be done at Rotherhithe - by adding some stairs at the far end of the platforms that would exit onto the pavement of the Rotherhithe tunnel approach road, but I'm less sure of how it might be done at Wapping. Perhaps my my understanding of the situation is a bit wonky - but I am very certain that the DDA doesn't require TfL to install lifts at these stations. Remember - when the ELLX opens, they will not be new stations, they will simply be old stations that were temporarily closed for a period. Legally as well as practically speaking, the East London Line has not been permanently closed, it is temprarily closed whilst it is extended. The only part of it that has been permanently closed is Shoreditch station, and that happened last year. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Live travel news vs. Live departure boards | London Transport | |||
London Travelwatch forum dead | London Transport | |||
Harrow: unusual taxi, the LU-owned market and the dead gasworks branch | London Transport | |||
Fake dead ends | London Transport | |||
Fake dead ends | London Transport |