16/01/2008 - London Lite
I dont normally read the London Lite but an article caught my eye. There was
on an article on the average house prices around each station. The houses had to be within half a mile of the station. Apperently Hatton Cross has the cheapest house prices. I forget which station has the most expensive. It would be nice to see the full list of stations and their house prices rather than the limited ones the London Lite printed. The East London Line is the cheapest for house prices followed by the Central Line. |
16/01/2008 - London Lite
On 16 Jan, 18:49, wrote:
I dont normally read the London Lite but an article caught my eye. There was on an article on the average house prices around each station. The houses had to be within half a mile of the station. Apperently Hatton Cross has the cheapest house prices. I forget which station has the most expensive. It would be nice to see the full list of stations and their house prices rather than the limited ones the London Lite printed. The East London Line is the cheapest for house prices followed by the Central Line. Hatton Cross is of course bang slap next to Heathrow airport! I can't immediately point you to anything offhand that fits the bill, but there is a vast amount of information about house prices in the various districts of London out there on the net. Of course as a general rule of thumb one can expect house prices in the vicinity of Underground stations to be higher. I note that the houses assessed "had to be within half a mile of the station" - factor in a mere 10 minutes walk and the overall picture could be quite different. |
16/01/2008 - London Lite
This appeared on the Going Underground blog:
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2341/...65864844f3.jpg As the Circle line runs exclusively in Zone 1, I suppose I shouldn't have been too surprised about the result. The least expensive stop on the Circle Line is Aldgate, with average property values hovering around £396,000. The Victoria Line came as the next most expensive line to buy property on, with average prices reaching £1,109,107. Green Park was most expensive stop for property on the Victoria Line with average house prices above £2 million. The least expensive stop was Tottenham Hale. "We were somewhat surprised to find the District Line appear in the seventh position, given it includes areas such as Fulham, Richmond and Wimbledon and follows the Circle Line through many parts of Central London. It would be interesting to see where the East London Line would rank today if the 2010 extension was already in place." said Michael O'Flynn, from FindaProperty. Apparently the Essex parts of the District Line weakened its overall average. The Waterloo & City Line came in at last place as there are "minimal residential pockets" around Waterloo and Bank stations. |
16/01/2008 - London Lite
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:26:15 -0800 (PST), Mizter T
wrote: On 16 Jan, 18:49, wrote: I dont normally read the London Lite but an article caught my eye. There was on an article on the average house prices around each station. The houses had to be within half a mile of the station. Apperently Hatton Cross has the cheapest house prices. I forget which station has the most expensive. It would be nice to see the full list of stations and their house prices rather than the limited ones the London Lite printed. The East London Line is the cheapest for house prices followed by the Central Line. Hatton Cross is of course bang slap next to Heathrow airport! Precisely. Who would want to live there! I can't immediately point you to anything offhand that fits the bill, but there is a vast amount of information about house prices in the various districts of London out there on the net. Of course as a general rule of thumb one can expect house prices in the vicinity of Underground stations to be higher. As you say there's a massive volume of high price info published on a regular basis. A few google searches for estate agent websites would soon identify the price ranges. -- Paul C Admits to working for London Underground! |
16/01/2008 - London Lite
|
16/01/2008 - London Lite
In message
, at 11:26:15 on Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Mizter T remarked: I note that the houses assessed "had to be within half a mile of the station" - factor in a mere 10 minutes walk and the overall picture could be quite different. When I lived near a commuter station, just outside the M25, my rule of thumb for house prices (of otherwise similar properties) was 2% per minute's walk from the station. [Actually it was £1,000, but the average prices for say a three bed semi were about £50k; probably about £300k now]. -- Roland Perry |
16/01/2008 - London Lite
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, sweek wrote:
This appeared on the Going Underground blog: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2341/...65864844f3.jpg For those who'd actually like to read the article: http://london-underground.blogspot.c...-property.html As the Circle line runs exclusively in Zone 1, I suppose I shouldn't have been too surprised about the result. The least expensive stop on the Circle Line is Aldgate, with average property values hovering around £396,000. The Victoria Line came as the next most expensive line to buy property on, with average prices reaching £1,109,107. Green Park was most expensive stop for property on the Victoria Line with average house prices above £2 million. The least expensive stop was Tottenham Hale. Like the Circle, it doesn't go that far out - the five northern and three southern stations in marginal-to-scummy areas have eight stops in rather nice and/or central parts of town to balance them. The Bakerloo comes third and the H&C fourth, and those are also lines which have smaller-than-average suburban parts, as they only protrude from central London on one side. The same's true of the Met, of course, which manages to be quite a bit cheaper. Are houses not that much up in the wilds of Harrow, Northwood and Ruislip, then? "We were somewhat surprised to find the District Line appear in the seventh position, given it includes areas such as Fulham, Richmond and Wimbledon and follows the Circle Line through many parts of Central London. It's also the East End Main Line! The Waterloo & City Line came in at last place as there are "minimal residential pockets" around Waterloo and Bank stations. Minimal and cheap, presumably, which surprises me. tom -- It's amazing how often conversations with you have the imaginary sound of human bones being crushed to rubble in the background. -- itchyfidget, to snowking |
16/01/2008 - London Lite
On 16 Jan, 21:12, Paul Corfield wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:26:15 -0800 (PST), Mizter T wrote: On 16 Jan, 18:49, wrote: I dont normally read the London Lite but an article caught my eye. There was on an article on the average house prices around each station. The houses had to be within half a mile of the station. Apperently Hatton Cross has the cheapest house prices. I forget which station has the most expensive. It would be nice to see the full list of stations and their house prices rather than the limited ones the London Lite printed. The East London Line is the cheapest for house prices followed by the Central Line. Hatton Cross is of course bang slap next to Heathrow airport! Precisely. Who would want to live there! Deaf planespotters? |
16/01/2008 - London Lite
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:29:44 +0000, Tom Anderson wrote:
As the Circle line runs exclusively in Zone 1, I suppose I shouldn't have been too surprised about the result. The least expensive stop on the Circle Line is Aldgate, with average property values hovering around £396,000. The Victoria Line came as the next most expensive line to buy property on, with average prices reaching £1,109,107. Green Park was most expensive stop for property on the Victoria Line with average house prices above £2 million. The least expensive stop was Tottenham Hale. Like the Circle, it doesn't go that far out - the five northern and three southern stations in marginal-to-scummy areas have eight stops in rather nice and/or central parts of town to balance them. The Bakerloo comes third and the H&C fourth, and those are also lines which have smaller-than-average suburban parts, as they only protrude from central London on one side. The same's true of the Met, of course, which manages to be quite a bit cheaper. Are houses not that much up in the wilds of Harrow, Northwood and Ruislip, then? To my mind, the Met manages to largely avoid the less salubrious areas of London. I think it's more that the Met is more heavily weighted towards the outer suburbs - it has fewer stations than average in Zone 1, then skips Zones 2/3 almost completely, and has lots of stations in Zones 5/6 and out in the sticks (a quick glance at the Tube map suggests that perhaps a third of all Z5/6 Tube stations are on the Met). Meanwhile, the Bakerloo passes through some pretty scummy areas, yet comes out near the top thanks to having plenty of stations in Z1/2 and only one suburban branch (that only just makes it out as far as Z5). The whole table is basically meaningless; as you suggest, it's more a measure of how a line's stops are distributed in terms of distance from the centre than how pleasant they are to live on. If they'd somehow managed to factor distance out of their calculations, they might have got more interesting results. |
16/01/2008 - London Lite
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, asdf wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:29:44 +0000, Tom Anderson wrote: As the Circle line runs exclusively in Zone 1, I suppose I shouldn't have been too surprised about the result. The least expensive stop on the Circle Line is Aldgate, with average property values hovering around £396,000. The Victoria Line came as the next most expensive line to buy property on, with average prices reaching £1,109,107. Green Park was most expensive stop for property on the Victoria Line with average house prices above £2 million. The least expensive stop was Tottenham Hale. Like the Circle, it doesn't go that far out - the five northern and three southern stations in marginal-to-scummy areas have eight stops in rather nice and/or central parts of town to balance them. The Bakerloo comes third and the H&C fourth, and those are also lines which have smaller-than-average suburban parts, as they only protrude from central London on one side. The same's true of the Met, of course, which manages to be quite a bit cheaper. Are houses not that much up in the wilds of Harrow, Northwood and Ruislip, then? To my mind, the Met manages to largely avoid the less salubrious areas of London. I think it's more that the Met is more heavily weighted towards the outer suburbs - it has fewer stations than average in Zone 1, then skips Zones 2/3 almost completely, and has lots of stations in Zones 5/6 and out in the sticks (a quick glance at the Tube map suggests that perhaps a third of all Z5/6 Tube stations are on the Met). True. I'm still surprised at the implication that prices in nice parts of Z5/6 are apparently lower than in manky parts of Z2/3. The whole table is basically meaningless; as you suggest, it's more a measure of how a line's stops are distributed in terms of distance from the centre than how pleasant they are to live on. If they'd somehow managed to factor distance out of their calculations, they might have got more interesting results. They could break it down by zone, and have separate bar-charts for each. Or how about some kind of crazy pie-chart, like a dartboard, with each sector allocated to a line, in roughly the order they head out of London, each ring corresponding to a zone, and then the height of a 3D tower rising from each block corresponding to the price? tom PS what do you call the subdivision of a circle that's the part of a sector between two concentric circles? I'm calling it a block because of hard disks, but it must have a proper name. -- Dude, read Aquinas if you want intelligent. This is the internet. |
16/01/2008 - London Lite
On 16 Jan, 21:13, Roland Perry wrote:
I dont normally read the London Lite but an article caught my eye. There was on an article on the average house prices around each station. The houses had to be within half a mile of the station. Apperently Hatton Cross has the cheapest house prices. I forget which station has the most expensive. I'm surprised anyone lives within half a mile of Hatton Cross. You'd have to be either a plane spotter or deaf!! Isn't Hatton Cross also within the Heathrow perimeter? In which case, with the exception of security guards and possibly the occasional long- term Travelodge-dweller, you wouldn't really expect there to be any houses even for deaf plane-spotters... -- John Band john at johnband dot org www.johnband.org |
16/01/2008 - London Lite
On 17 Jan, 00:09, John B wrote:
On 16 Jan, 21:13, Roland Perry wrote: I dont normally read the London Lite but an article caught my eye. There was on an article on the average house prices around each station. The houses had to be within half a mile of the station. Apperently Hatton Cross has the cheapest house prices. I forget which station has the most expensive. I'm surprised anyone lives within half a mile of Hatton Cross. You'd have to be either a plane spotter or deaf!! Isn't Hatton Cross also within the Heathrow perimeter? In which case, with the exception of security guards and possibly the occasional long- term Travelodge-dweller, you wouldn't really expect there to be any houses even for deaf plane-spotters... There are several clusters of houses in Hatton within half a mile of the station - e.g. on Hatton Road, Myrtle Avenue, Fagg's Road, Green Man Lane, Dockwell Close... http://www.streetmap.co.uk/newmap.srf?x=509615&y=175403 Hatton Cross station might well be within the perimeter of the airport (however that is defined), but the above mentioned streets are not - and some properties on these streets do fall within the half mile mark. |
16/01/2008 - London Lite
On Jan 17, 12:05 am, Tom Anderson wrote:
True. I'm still surprised at the implication that prices in nice parts of Z5/6 are apparently lower than in manky parts of Z2/3. That does seem strange - but tube stations are more likely to be on a main road surrounded by shops, so that the average for areas further out is likely to be depressed by over-representation of locally undesirable flats. Not sure I've explained that very well! Basically a house in a cheap area can still cost more than a flat in a posh one. Did they try to correct for the nature of the property somehow (only include 2-bed houses or something)? Thanks Henry |
16/01/2008 - London Lite
In message
, at 16:09:59 on Wed, 16 Jan 2008, John B remarked: I dont normally read the London Lite but an article caught my eye. There was on an article on the average house prices around each station. The houses had to be within half a mile of the station. Apperently Hatton Cross has the cheapest house prices. I forget which station has the most expensive. I'm surprised anyone lives within half a mile of Hatton Cross. You'd have to be either a plane spotter or deaf!! Isn't Hatton Cross also within the Heathrow perimeter? In which case, with the exception of security guards and possibly the occasional long- term Travelodge-dweller, you wouldn't really expect there to be any houses even for deaf plane-spotters... I wonder what house prices they discovered half a mile from Heathrow Central (and whatever that station "for the Dome" is called - does half a mile get you across to the north bank of the river?) -- Roland Perry |
16/01/2008 - London Lite
On 17 Jan, 06:26, Roland Perry wrote:
and whatever that station "for the Dome" is called There's an isolated terrace of houses that survived demolition of everything else, complete with pub: http://fancyapint.com/pubs/pub136.html Just over half a mile away there's Greenwich Millennium Village, which is a load of fancy flats. does half a mile get you across to the north bank of the river? Very nearly. U -- http://londonconnections.blogspot.com/ A blog about transport projects in London |
16/01/2008 - London Lite
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 11:26:15AM -0800, Mizter T wrote:
I note that the houses assessed "had to be within half a mile of the station" - factor in a mere 10 minutes walk and the overall picture could be quite different. Half a mile *is* about ten minutes walk. -- David Cantrell | A machine for turning tea into grumpiness Anyone willing to give up a little fun for tolerance deserves neither |
16/01/2008 - London Lite
Tom Anderson wrote:
PS what do you call the subdivision of a circle that's the part of a sector between two concentric circles? I'm calling it a block because of hard disks, but it must have a proper name. Pie squared? |
16/01/2008 - London Lite
Paul Corfield wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:26:15 -0800 (PST), Mizter T wrote: Hatton Cross is of course bang slap next to Heathrow airport! Precisely. Who would want to live there! The deaf. |
16/01/2008 - London Lite
On 17 Jan, 13:02, David Cantrell wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 11:26:15AM -0800, Mizter T wrote: I note that the houses assessed "had to be within half a mile of the station" - factor in a mere 10 minutes walk and the overall picture could be quite different. Half a mile *is* about ten minutes walk. Hmm... you make a fair point, I guess it's just that walking fairly briskly I cover (substantially?) more distance than that in 10 minutes (and I'm not particularly lanky or anything!). In fact I don't know what my walking speed is in mph, so perhaps I'll determine it by doing an experiment or two. |
16/01/2008 - London Lite
"Tom Anderson" wrote in message h.li... They could break it down by zone, and have separate bar-charts for each. Or how about some kind of crazy pie-chart, like a dartboard, with each sector allocated to a line, in roughly the order they head out of London, each ring corresponding to a zone, and then the height of a 3D tower rising from each block corresponding to the price? tom PS what do you call the subdivision of a circle that's the part of a sector between two concentric circles? I'm calling it a block because of hard disks, but it must have a proper name. Is it an annular sector? Paul S |
16/01/2008 - London Lite
"Mr Thant" wrote in message ... On 17 Jan, 06:26, Roland Perry wrote: and whatever that station "for the Dome" is called There's an isolated terrace of houses that survived demolition of everything else, complete with pub: http://fancyapint.com/pubs/pub136.html Just over half a mile away there's Greenwich Millennium Village, which is a load of fancy flats. does half a mile get you across to the north bank of the river? Very nearly. U -- http://londonconnections.blogspot.com/ A blog about transport projects in London Hattton Cross - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hatton_Cross From reading I'm suprised passenger numbers for the station are relatively high. |
16/01/2008 - London Lite
"Roland Perry" wrote in message ... In message , at 20:31:56 on Thu, 17 Jan 2008, remarked: Hattton Cross - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hatton_Cross From reading I'm suprised passenger numbers for the station are relatively high. Airport workers (overall, there's almost one for each passenger-per-day through the airport). -- Roland Perry You mean they get the Underground for one stop? Hardly worth it is it? |
16/01/2008 - London Lite
On 17 Jan, 20:55, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 20:31:56 on Thu, 17 Jan 2008, remarked: Hattton Cross - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hatton_Cross From reading I'm suprised passenger numbers for the station are relatively high. Airport workers (overall, there's almost one for each passenger-per-day through the airport). -- Roland Perry Really?! That's a somewhat astounding stat. Regarding passenger numbers at Hatton Cross, the figures on Wikipedia are for 2006 - and from January 2005 (I think) until September 2006 the Piccadilly line loop to Terminal 4 was closed for construction of the junction and line to the new Terminal 5 station. Therefore for over eight months of that year, most of those arriving by tube and heading for T4 would have exited at Hatton Cross to catch the replacement bus to T4. Nevertheless taking the tube from Hatton Cross to is a nifty way of getting to and from the central Heathrow complex (i.e. terminals 1,2 & 3). One could presume that many local workers use this route, perhaps arriving at Hatton Cross by bus or car (whether being dropped off or parking in the car park) - and indeed I dare suggest this might well be regarded as a nifty route by many others "in the know". Actually accessing the central Heathrow complex on foot is no longer possible - though there is apparently a free shuttle bus that goes through the tunnel that emerges in the north by Bath Road/the A4. Wikipedia tells me that there are two smaller tunnels that did used to be dedicated for pedestrians and cyclists, though these have now been modified to take a lane of cars, with cyclists apparently having priority and pedestrians getting booted out. I'm mildly intrigued - one day I'll go and investigate this arrangement. |
16/01/2008 - London Lite
On 17 Jan, 21:30, wrote:
"Roland Perry" wrote: In message , at 20:31:56 on Thu, 17 Jan 2008, remarked: Hattton Cross -http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hatton_Cross From reading I'm suprised passenger numbers for the station are relatively high. Airport workers (overall, there's almost one for each passenger-per-day through the airport). -- Roland Perry You mean they get the Underground for one stop? Hardly worth it is it? As I point out in my other post, there isn't any way of easily walking to the central Heathrow complex from Hatton Cross. Look at a street map... http://www.streetmap.co.uk/newmap.sr...75750&z=2&ar=N ...and you'll see that a pedestrian would have to walk north along Eastchurch Road, west along the Northern Perimeter Road then catch the shuttle bus from wherever it is that it leaves from to go into Heathrow (and I've looked and failed to find any information about this shuttle bus on the Heathrow website). The other option for pedestrians is to walk to Terminal 4 then catch the Heathrow Express train to Terminals 1,2 & 3 - though they do only go every 15 minutes, so the Piccadilly line does seem like a good option. Plus a Hatton Cross - Heathrow fare is just £1 at any time on Oyster PAYG. |
16/01/2008 - London Lite
On 16 Jan, 21:12, Paul Corfield wrote:
Hatton Cross is of course bang slap next to Heathrow airport! Precisely. Who would want to live there! After today, thrill-seekers? -- John Band john at johnband dot org www.johnband.org |
16/01/2008 - London Lite
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Henry wrote:
On Jan 17, 12:05 am, Tom Anderson wrote: True. I'm still surprised at the implication that prices in nice parts of Z5/6 are apparently lower than in manky parts of Z2/3. That does seem strange - but tube stations are more likely to be on a main road surrounded by shops, so that the average for areas further out is likely to be depressed by over-representation of locally undesirable flats. Not sure I've explained that very well! Basically a house in a cheap area can still cost more than a flat in a posh one. No, i get it - in the outer suburbs, there are town centres around the stations, with shops and cheap, undesirable housing, with the leafy lanes of big expensive houses further out. Makes perfect sense. Did they try to correct for the nature of the property somehow (only include 2-bed houses or something)? I don't believe so. tom -- It's just really ****ing good and that's all. -- Gabe, on the Macintosh |
16/01/2008 - London Lite
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Paul Scott wrote:
"Tom Anderson" wrote in message h.li... PS what do you call the subdivision of a circle that's the part of a sector between two concentric circles? I'm calling it a block because of hard disks, but it must have a proper name. Is it an annular sector? Aha. That's certainly what this report on people being exposed to radiation from a reprocessing plant calls them: http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/li...eis0220_4.html This analysis of outgassing calls them 'annulus sectors', which comes to much the same thing: http://www.gps.caltech.edu/genesis/Outgassing.html tom -- It's just really ****ing good and that's all. -- Gabe, on the Macintosh |
16/01/2008 - London Lite
In message , at 21:30:27 on
Thu, 17 Jan 2008, remarked: From reading I'm suprised passenger numbers for the station are relatively high. Airport workers (overall, there's almost one for each passenger-per-day through the airport). You mean they get the Underground for one stop? Hardly worth it is it? The airport workers concerned are arriving at Hatton Cross because there are many airport related facilities nearby. -- Roland Perry |
16/01/2008 - London Lite
In message
, at 13:39:36 on Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Mizter T remarked: Nevertheless taking the tube from Hatton Cross to is a nifty way of getting to and from the central Heathrow complex (i.e. terminals 1,2 & 3). One could presume that many local workers use this route, perhaps arriving at Hatton Cross by bus or car (whether being dropped off or parking in the car park) - and indeed I dare suggest this might well be regarded as a nifty route by many others "in the know". I wasn't really thinking about those airport workers, but I think BA may have quite a large staff car park in the vicinity. One might expect them to have a private shuttle bus for staff, though. Actually accessing the central Heathrow complex on foot is no longer possible - though there is apparently a free shuttle bus that goes through the tunnel that emerges in the north by Bath Road/the A4. Wikipedia tells me that there are two smaller tunnels that did used to be dedicated for pedestrians and cyclists, and taxis, wasn't it? though these have now been modified to take a lane of cars, with cyclists apparently having priority and pedestrians getting booted out. I'm mildly intrigued - one day I'll go and investigate this arrangement. The smaller tunnels are also planned to be repurposed yet again - for phase 2 of the pod-trains (if the trial at terminal 5 is a success). -- Roland Perry |
16/01/2008 - London Lite
Mizter T wrote:
Wikipedia tells me that there are two smaller tunnels that did used to be dedicated for pedestrians and cyclists, though these have now been modified to take a lane of cars, with cyclists apparently having priority and pedestrians getting booted out. I'm mildly intrigued - one day I'll go and investigate this arrangement. The southbound tunnel is heavily used as a handy way to get into the airport. I find it mildly scary because the walls and roof are so close to the vehicle that it feels like playing that kids game where you move a metal loop along a metal wire and mustn't position it even a centimetre wrong or the bell will ring. The northbound one seems even narrower and lower, and is virtually unused because there is a forced left turn at the northern end, meaning it's no use unless you want the A4 to Colnbrook. http://maps.live.com/default.aspx?v=...2826&encType=1 shows the red cycle path encouraging cyclists to use the middle rather than hug the kerb where some fool might try to overtake them. There is a similar marking on the southbound one. |
16/01/2008 - London Lite
Mizter T wrote You mean they get the Underground for one stop? Hardly worth it is it? As I point out in my other post, there isn't any way of easily walking to the central Heathrow complex from Hatton Cross. Look at a street Plus a Hatton Cross - Heathrow fare is just £1 at any time on Oyster PAYG. But any bus trip within the Heathrow complex is free which includes Hatton Cross to Terminal 4 or Harlington corner / Heathrow central bus station (mentioned on the web site I think but I am actually looking at the 555 timetable leaflet). -- Mike D |
16/01/2008 - London Lite
"Mizter T" wrote in message ... On 17 Jan, 20:55, Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 20:31:56 on Thu, 17 Jan 2008, remarked: Hattton Cross - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hatton_Cross From reading I'm suprised passenger numbers for the station are relatively high. Airport workers (overall, there's almost one for each passenger-per-day through the airport). -- Roland Perry Really?! That's a somewhat astounding stat. Regarding passenger numbers at Hatton Cross, the figures on Wikipedia are for 2006 - and from January 2005 (I think) until September 2006 the Piccadilly line loop to Terminal 4 was closed for construction of the junction and line to the new Terminal 5 station. Therefore for over eight months of that year, most of those arriving by tube and heading for T4 would have exited at Hatton Cross to catch the replacement bus to T4. Nevertheless taking the tube from Hatton Cross to is a nifty way of getting to and from the central Heathrow complex (i.e. terminals 1,2 & 3). One could presume that many local workers use this route, perhaps arriving at Hatton Cross by bus or car (whether being dropped off or parking in the car park) - and indeed I dare suggest this might well be regarded as a nifty route by many others "in the know". Actually accessing the central Heathrow complex on foot is no longer possible - though there is apparently a free shuttle bus that goes through the tunnel that emerges in the north by Bath Road/the A4. Aren't all the buses free or did they stop that? tim |
16/01/2008 - London Lite
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:05:52 -0000, "Paul Scott"
wrote: "Tom Anderson" wrote in message th.li... They could break it down by zone, and have separate bar-charts for each. Or how about some kind of crazy pie-chart, like a dartboard, with each sector allocated to a line, in roughly the order they head out of London, each ring corresponding to a zone, and then the height of a 3D tower rising from each block corresponding to the price? tom PS what do you call the subdivision of a circle that's the part of a sector between two concentric circles? I'm calling it a block because of hard disks, but it must have a proper name. Is it an annular sector? Paul S I thought annulus but I could be wrong Martin |
16/01/2008 - London Lite
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:58:10 +0000, Martin Rich
wrote: On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:05:52 -0000, "Paul Scott" wrote: "Tom Anderson" wrote in message rth.li... They could break it down by zone, and have separate bar-charts for each. Or how about some kind of crazy pie-chart, like a dartboard, with each sector allocated to a line, in roughly the order they head out of London, each ring corresponding to a zone, and then the height of a 3D tower rising from each block corresponding to the price? tom PS what do you call the subdivision of a circle that's the part of a sector between two concentric circles? I'm calling it a block because of hard disks, but it must have a proper name. Is it an annular sector? Paul S I thought annulus but I could be wrong An annulus is a complete ring between two concentric circles. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annulus_%28mathematics%29 |
16/01/2008 - London Lite
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 16:12:29 +0000, James Farrar
wrote: snipped Is it an annular sector? Paul S I thought annulus but I could be wrong An annulus is a complete ring between two concentric circles. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annulus_%28mathematics%29 Sorry - you're right. It's a long time since I did any geometry Martin |
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:24 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk