So, who was right about Eurostar ridership?
 

Now that Eurostar has been running the full length of HS1 and has been
serving St. Pancras for a little over five months, who was right?

Did all of the people living in areas reachable from, via or in SW
London who used to go via Waterloo give up and go to Gatwick? Did
swarms of people that once stuffed themselves into the Underground and
Thameslink to get to Waterloo from Euston, KxSTP and Liverpool St now
just walk up to the St. Pancras turnstiles?

I'm curious to know if any hard data exists on how precisely the
ridership on Eurostar has altered as a result of the switch to St.
Pancras.

Also, as an aside - will the minimum UIC B+ structure gauge be taken
advantage of anytime soon by larger HSE-conforming TGVs anytime within
the next 10 years?

So, who was right about Eurostar ridership?
 

In message
, at
08:26:52 on Sat, 10 May 2008, TheOneKEA remarked:
I'm curious to know if any hard data exists on how precisely the
ridership on Eurostar has altered as a result of the switch to St.
Pancras.

Eurostar claim that overall ridership is up about 30% with numbers of
passengers form the Midlands doubling.
--
Roland Perry

So, who was right about Eurostar ridership?
 

On Sat, 10 May 2008 08:26:52 -0700 (PDT), TheOneKEA
wrote:

Now that Eurostar has been running the full length of HS1 and has been
serving St. Pancras for a little over five months, who was right?

Did all of the people living in areas reachable from, via or in SW
London who used to go via Waterloo give up and go to Gatwick? Did
swarms of people that once stuffed themselves into the Underground and
Thameslink to get to Waterloo from Euston, KxSTP and Liverpool St now
just walk up to the St. Pancras turnstiles?

I'm curious to know if any hard data exists on how precisely the
ridership on Eurostar has altered as a result of the switch to St.
Pancras.

I have seen no hard data at all. From my own experience of using the
Victoria Line I have certainly noticed a pronounced increase in people
with luggage heading to Kings Cross - largely from those stations south
of KX. Make what you will of that completely unscientific observation!

Kings Cross tube station also appears to impersonate "hell on earth" on
a fairly regular basis - despite all the improvement works. I just hope
the remaining work does something to take some of the pressure off.

--
Paul C


Admits to working for London Underground!

So, who was right about Eurostar ridership?
 

In message , at 16:38:27 on
Sat, 10 May 2008, Paul Corfield remarked:
Kings Cross tube station also appears to impersonate "hell on earth" on
a fairly regular basis - despite all the improvement works. I just hope
the remaining work does something to take some of the pressure off.

It's a farce. Has so much disruption ever before produced so little
improvement?
--
Roland Perry

So, who was right about Eurostar ridership?
 

Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 16:38:27
on Sat, 10 May 2008, Paul Corfield remarked:
Kings Cross tube station also appears to impersonate "hell on earth"
on a fairly regular basis - despite all the improvement works. I
just hope the remaining work does something to take some of the
pressure off.

It's a farce. Has so much disruption ever before produced so little
improvement?

Closing a road for a week to install "tables" (low speed bumps at the
entrances) must top that!

So, who was right about Eurostar ridership?
 

On May 10, 11:59 am, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 16:38:27 on
Sat, 10 May 2008, Paul Corfield remarked:

Kings Cross tube station also appears to impersonate "hell on earth" on
a fairly regular basis - despite all the improvement works. I just hope
the remaining work does something to take some of the pressure off.

It's a farce. Has so much disruption ever before produced so little
improvement?

Probably because the disruption is creating capacity for which demand
already exists. I wouldn't be the least bit shocked if the entire
Underground/NR complex is just as busy after the LU northern ticket
hall, direct links from Midland Road LL and the KX western ticket hall/
piazza works are finished - it would prove that the improvements were
done about 5-10 years too late.

So, who was right about Eurostar ridership?
 

In message
, at
09:28:54 on Sat, 10 May 2008, TheOneKEA remarked:
Kings Cross tube station also appears to impersonate "hell on earth" on
a fairly regular basis - despite all the improvement works. I just hope
the remaining work does something to take some of the pressure off.

It's a farce. Has so much disruption ever before produced so little
improvement?

Probably because the disruption is creating capacity for which demand
already exists. I wouldn't be the least bit shocked if the entire
Underground/NR complex is just as busy after the LU northern ticket
hall, direct links from Midland Road LL and the KX western ticket hall/
piazza works are finished - it would prove that the improvements were
done about 5-10 years too late.

It also shows that the improvements are not sufficient. For the last ten
years the queues at the ticket offices have been unacceptably long, and
after the rebuilding, they still are. Why didn't they simply build more
ticket office positions?

--
Roland Perry

So, who was right about Eurostar ridership?
 

On May 10, 5:36*pm, Roland Perry wrote:
In message
, at
09:28:54 on Sat, 10 May 2008, TheOneKEA remarked:

Kings Cross tube station also appears to impersonate "hell on earth" on
a fairly regular basis - despite all the improvement works. *I just hope
the remaining work does something to take some of the pressure off.

It's a farce. Has so much disruption ever before produced so little
improvement?

Probably because the disruption is creating capacity for which demand
already exists. I wouldn't be the least bit shocked if the entire
Underground/NR complex is just as busy after the LU northern ticket
hall, direct links from Midland Road LL and the KX western ticket hall/
piazza works are finished - it would prove that the improvements were
done about 5-10 years too late.

It also shows that the improvements are not sufficient. For the last ten
years the queues at the ticket offices have been unacceptably long, and
after the rebuilding, they still are. Why didn't they simply build more
ticket office positions?


That reminds me of a Two Ronnies joke about post offices.

"We all know the situation where there are four counters and three of
them are closed. Well, in future there will be twelve counters, and
eleven of them will be closed."

I arrived a Kings Cross from oop north in the evening a few months
back and needed to put some Oyster credit on for one journey home.

The ticket office was closed, so I stood in a long queue for a machine
that refused to take my money. A member of staff had a few attempts
at trying to get it to accept the perfectly good note and then told me
that there was a problem with that machine and I must now go and stand
in another long queue.

I asked why he and the other staff present didn't just open the ticket
office, which could deal with it easily, but they were all far too
busy running from queue to queue, helping punters who were having
problems with crappily-maintained machines, to answer my question.

I can't remember the exact hour, but the station was open and busy,
with lots of staff dealing very inefficiently with punters who were
desperately trying to hand over money.

Why couldn't they open the ticket office? Is it any wonder that some
people end up travelling without paying?

So, who was right about Eurostar ridership?
 

"TheOneKEA" wrote in message
...
Now that Eurostar has been running the full length of HS1 and has been
serving St. Pancras for a little over five months, who was right?

Did all of the people living in areas reachable from, via or in SW
London who used to go via Waterloo give up and go to Gatwick? Did
swarms of people that once stuffed themselves into the Underground and
Thameslink to get to Waterloo from Euston, KxSTP and Liverpool St now
just walk up to the St. Pancras turnstiles?

All the bally-hoo about the half hour chopped off the London-Paris time is
somewhat moot for those of us who'd travel into Waterloo. That half hour
saved is spent making the unpleasant trip from Waterloo to St Pancras.

Ho hum!

So, who was right about Eurostar ridership?
 

In article ,
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 16:38:27 on
Sat, 10 May 2008, Paul Corfield remarked:
Kings Cross tube station also appears to impersonate "hell on earth" on
a fairly regular basis - despite all the improvement works. I just hope
the remaining work does something to take some of the pressure off.

It's a farce. Has so much disruption ever before produced so little
improvement?

The West Coast Main Line upgrades ?

Nick
--
Serendipity: http://www.leverton.org/blosxom (last update 2nd April 2008)
"The Internet, a sort of ersatz counterfeit of real life"
-- Janet Street-Porter, BBC2, 19th March 1996