Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 14 Jul, 17:38, John B wrote:
However, it would have been much more sensible (ie cheap) to make the TL2k+n specification equivalent to "Desiro or Electrostar, but a bit faster and a bit lighter; if you're not Siemens or Bombardier you're welcome to bid but bear in mind that we're not going to pay the development costs of a whole new train platform", rather than going for a step change in capabilities and weights. But how have they not done that? I'm sure Bombardier and Siemens' bids won't be far off a "Desiro or Electrostar, but a bit faster and a bit lighter", and the other companies' bids likewise. U -- http://londonconnections.blogspot.com/ A blog about transport projects in London |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Wagn Rolling Stock | London Transport | |||
Wagn Rolling Stock | London Transport | |||
East London Line Rolling Stock Proposals | London Transport | |||
Rolling stock losses in the bombs | London Transport | |||
LUL rolling stock question | London Transport |