| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
 |
|
Menu
| London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
| London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#9
August 1st 08, 11:07 PM
posted to misc.transport.urban-transit,uk.transport.london,uk.railway
|
|||
|
|||
BBC: Attempt to "Save" Lost Euston Arch
On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 22:46:52 +0100, Graeme Wall
wrote in misc.transport.urban-transit: In message Free Lunch wrote: On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 19:16:56 +0100, Stimpy wrote in misc.transport.urban-transit: On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 17:24:58 +0100, 1506 wrote The sixties really were an appalling decade for a "slash and burn" attitude to anything old. No worse than the Victorians The Victorians did, saddly, destroy some fine earlier work. But there own building were generally good. That is, of course, a matter of opinion As with most ages, there are great buildings and great monstrosities that were built, often with very similar style, but with one designed by an architect who should never have had a commission. Bloody Stupid Johnson was not invented out of whole cloth. Bergholt Studdley please... My most abject apologies. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| BBC: Attempt to "Save" Lost Euston Arch | London Transport | |||
| BBC: Attempt to "Save" Lost Euston Arch | London Transport | |||
| BBC: Attempt to "Save" Lost Euston Arch | London Transport | |||
| BBC: Attempt to "Save" Lost Euston Arch | London Transport | |||
| BBC: Attempt to "Save" Lost Euston Arch | London Transport | |||
Threaded Mode
