London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11   Report Post  
Old September 12th 08, 07:04 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: May 2007
Posts: 139
Default Why No Tubelines Bashing


"Barry Salter" wrote in message
...
zen83237 wrote:

Metronet went bust because the parent companies pulled the plug because
they stood little chance of getting much of the predicted future
overspend of £2bn. I don't agree that they went bust because of the
difference between Metronet's cost overuns to date and the assessors
figure.
Anyway how does that have any relevance to comparing Metronets future
oversend of £2bn for work on 5 lines verses Tubelines predicted future
overspend on work on 3 lines.
Tubelines are so supposed to be super efficient and do all there jobs for
the estimated cost.

I suspect the *main* reason that there's little "Tublines bashing" going
on is that Tubelines seem to be more competent overall than Metronet were,
with few (if any) noticeable engineering overruns (compare and contrast
with the Waterloo and City Line and multiple overruns on the Victoria
Line, for example).

Talking of the Waterloo and City, does anyone know if the work that was
originally planned for the closure has finally been completed yet, or is
it still ongoing?

Cheers,

Barry


The concensus that I heard was that Metronet had the more difficult
contracts in the early years and that Tubelines difficult contracts were
later on. So although Metronet stumbled early Tubelines would be seen to be
not quite as brilliant as they appear in later years.
I will be interested to see how the Northern resignalling goes once it
really gets going if the resignalling of the almost new, by comparison,
Jubilee line is anything to go by.

Kevin



  #12   Report Post  
Old September 15th 08, 11:16 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jan 2006
Posts: 942
Default Why No Tubelines Bashing

On Sep 12, 7:59*pm, "Zen83237" wrote:
You accept that Tubelines overspend is entirely justified the. Do you work
fot Tubelines by any chance.


No - I'm assuming that the PPP Arbiter is doing his job fairly and
impartially. He has ruled that Metronet's overspend was unjustified
and that Tube Lines's projected overspend is justified. If you have
any evidence that he is not doing his job fairly and impartially, you
should send it to TfL and the Treasury urgently.

--
John Band
john at johnband dot org
www.johnband.org



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tubelines in Metroland Kev London Transport 6 October 12th 08 05:31 PM
Tubelines inherited the problem says MD Mal London Transport 5 October 20th 05 06:08 PM
Tubelines on ebay marcb London Transport 3 December 12th 04 08:59 PM
Why the piccadilly to Heathrow , why not the District? Boltar London Transport 41 October 26th 03 08:04 PM
Why is it called an 'Oyster'card? Cast_Iron London Transport 0 July 30th 03 08:26 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017