Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Barry Salter" wrote in message ... zen83237 wrote: Metronet went bust because the parent companies pulled the plug because they stood little chance of getting much of the predicted future overspend of £2bn. I don't agree that they went bust because of the difference between Metronet's cost overuns to date and the assessors figure. Anyway how does that have any relevance to comparing Metronets future oversend of £2bn for work on 5 lines verses Tubelines predicted future overspend on work on 3 lines. Tubelines are so supposed to be super efficient and do all there jobs for the estimated cost. I suspect the *main* reason that there's little "Tublines bashing" going on is that Tubelines seem to be more competent overall than Metronet were, with few (if any) noticeable engineering overruns (compare and contrast with the Waterloo and City Line and multiple overruns on the Victoria Line, for example). Talking of the Waterloo and City, does anyone know if the work that was originally planned for the closure has finally been completed yet, or is it still ongoing? Cheers, Barry The concensus that I heard was that Metronet had the more difficult contracts in the early years and that Tubelines difficult contracts were later on. So although Metronet stumbled early Tubelines would be seen to be not quite as brilliant as they appear in later years. I will be interested to see how the Northern resignalling goes once it really gets going if the resignalling of the almost new, by comparison, Jubilee line is anything to go by. Kevin |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 12, 7:59*pm, "Zen83237" wrote:
You accept that Tubelines overspend is entirely justified the. Do you work fot Tubelines by any chance. No - I'm assuming that the PPP Arbiter is doing his job fairly and impartially. He has ruled that Metronet's overspend was unjustified and that Tube Lines's projected overspend is justified. If you have any evidence that he is not doing his job fairly and impartially, you should send it to TfL and the Treasury urgently. -- John Band john at johnband dot org www.johnband.org |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Tubelines in Metroland | London Transport | |||
Tubelines inherited the problem says MD | London Transport | |||
Tubelines on ebay | London Transport | |||
Why the piccadilly to Heathrow , why not the District? | London Transport | |||
Why is it called an 'Oyster'card? | London Transport |