Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
378 move and GOB to be DC?
Paul Corfield wrote: (snip) We are getting new trains, tarted up stations (ignoring ELLX which is on a different scale), some signalling works and some limited segregation Highbury - Camden Road. We've also got Oyster ticketing which is partly integrated at the moment but obviously Overground is more to do with the rail network that say buses or DLR. Much of the infrastructure work is to try to accommodate ELLX reaching Highbury and to accommodate freight not segregate it! We've also just had yet more cost cutting at Camden Road which compromises the service offer and potentially service quality. What's the real story with the reduced works package at Camden Road? Is it simply that there is an allocated pot of money for these works, and after some more detailed surveying had been done TfL and Network Rail realised that the remedial works to bring the rail bridges up to the required standard was going to cost significantly more than originally estimated? That certainly appears to be the public line that TfL are taking, and it's not like the rationale is totally unbelievable. Or has the allocated pot of money shrunk, or indeed was the allocated amount never set in stone and thus was somewhat flexible - i.e. have costs literally been cut for these works? That would fit in with the notion that Boris is cutting budgets, though I was under the half- impression that the new Mayoral administration had agreed that TfL's budget was not under any major threat? (Or were the planned works deemed as not delivering enough "taxpayer value"?) If the problem is the former - i.e. that the money available simply doesn't cover the proposed works - then of course that's a big shame, and it's also a shame that TfL couldn't find the money elsewhere or pursuade the DfT to rustle up some cash for them, though of course (a) the new Mayor isn't going to wield anything like the same amount of pursuasive influence with central government as his predecessor, and (b) perhaps just as importantly budgets are being squeezed all across central government and (to some extent) the wider public sector now, so the money isn't there for the taking anyway. Nonetheless I still can't help but feel that the Mayor should've put in more of a fight to make the original scheme happen. Perhaps it's part of some faustian bargain with the DfT whereby ELLX phase 2 gets funded? (I wish!) Or is ELLX phase 2 going to hit the rocks as well? :- ( (snip) Basically i don't get the use of 'tube-style trains' as a diss. Tube-style trains aren't a compromise, they're exactly what's needed on the tube. If it's the paucity of doors that's being criticised, then i'm with that. Given that none of us have travelled in a 378 or seen one in action yet I think it's too early to be critical. Having seen one or two busy NLL trains I can see why there is an emphasis on standing space rather than seats. Whether the design is correct internally we shall wait and see. I doubt it will prove impossible to rejig the interior if it is deemed not to "work" correctly. FWIW there is going to be a large, open gangway between each carriage that should ease the passage of people into less crowded carriages - see: http://londonconnections.blogspot.co...ain-photo.html As you say, it's not going to be the end of the world if this new arrangement doesn't work. I reckon that grab handles suspended from the top bars might make an appearance... you heard it here first! |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
GOB Class 172s | London Transport | |||
Class 378 in service | London Transport | |||
New platform markings for class 378 at Shepherd's Bush | London Transport | |||
OT - BA postpones long-haul move to T5 | London Transport | |||
Waterloo - KX post Eurostar move | London Transport |