Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
378 move and GOB to be DC?
On 24 Sep, 14:27, Paul Corfield wrote: On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 05:26:20 -0700 (PDT), Mizter T wrote: Paul Corfield wrote: (snip) We are getting new trains, tarted up stations (ignoring ELLX which is on a different scale), some signalling works and some limited segregation Highbury - Camden Road. We've also got Oyster ticketing which is partly integrated at the moment but obviously Overground is more to do with the rail network that say buses or DLR. Much of the infrastructure work is to try to accommodate ELLX reaching Highbury and to accommodate freight not segregate it! We've also just had yet more cost cutting at Camden Road which compromises the service offer and potentially service quality. What's the real story with the reduced works package at Camden Road? Is it simply that there is an allocated pot of money for these works, and after some more detailed surveying had been done TfL and Network Rail realised that the remedial works to bring the rail bridges up to the required standard was going to cost significantly more than originally estimated? That certainly appears to be the public line that TfL are taking, and it's not like the rationale is totally unbelievable. I am told the costs from Network Rail came in higher than expected. Attempts to reduce the costs and preserve the scheme failed so therefore scope got the chop instead. Thanks. It is, as I thought likely, basically as simple as that. The four bridges over roads do look to be in a pretty crummy condition it must be said, and I suppose their location in a tightly packed urban environment can only increase costs. Or has the allocated pot of money shrunk, or indeed was the allocated amount never set in stone and thus was somewhat flexible - i.e. have costs literally been cut for these works? That would fit in with the notion that Boris is cutting budgets, though I was under the half- impression that the new Mayoral administration had agreed that TfL's budget was not under any major threat? (Or were the planned works deemed as not delivering enough "taxpayer value"?) TfL's budget is under huge threat from all sorts of issues - Crossrail and PPP being just two. There are huge reviews and reorganisations being undertaken to reduce costs. These started prior to the Mayoral election but the intended arrival of Mr Parker certainly added some "emphasis" to the process. Even though he's not turning up you'll note the quote from Mr Hendy in the fares increase press release about a review process inside TfL to "release funds". Yes, I was well aware of the enormous pressures on the budget from Crossrail and Metronet (the former in particular). I think my comment came more from the news that the 'Boris budget cut backs' that were going to affect other parts of the GLA (various City Hall functions in particular) were not being extended to TfL - i.e. TfL's budget was not going to be cut - but this doesn't mean that there isn't the possibility of cuts of all sorts across TfL to enable funds to be diverted towards Crossrail and Metronet. Interesting what you say about the cost reviews starting prior to the new administration but actually thinking about it that makes perfect sense. I missed any discussions that happened here at the time but I'm very glad that the so-called 'Prince of Darkness' Mr Parker won't be the one swinging the knife - his talk of how "my shareholders will be the taxpayers of London" missed a rather crucial point I feel, which is that said Londoners would also be "his" customers. (I've read some speculation that Bob Crow scared him off!) Mr Parker's departure seems to secure the position of Peter Hendy as Transport Commissioner, the deal being that he gets to hold the knife instead - but if there is to be surgery I'd far prefer him to be doing it. (The "release funds" quote is an interesting bit of spin it must be said - AFAICS "generate funds" is really what he's saying!) Back to the reduced scope of the Camden Road works, I've read elsewhere people decrying this as the first concrete (or rather rusty bridge) example of the widely feared Boris cutbacks affecting transport schemes, but I did feel like this was too simple an analysis - given the money pressures elsewhere would the same course of action (or inaction) happened under the custodianship of Livingstone I asked myself, and obviously there's no definitive answer but I think it quite possible. He was also a pragmatist, and whilst he may have been persuasive when it came to getting cash out of central government I don't think the Treasury is remotely in the mood for loosening the purse strings right now. If the problem is the former - i.e. that the money available simply doesn't cover the proposed works - then of course that's a big shame, and it's also a shame that TfL couldn't find the money elsewhere or pursuade the DfT to rustle up some cash for them, though of course (a) the new Mayor isn't going to wield anything like the same amount of pursuasive influence with central government as his predecessor, and (b) perhaps just as importantly budgets are being squeezed all across central government and (to some extent) the wider public sector now, so the money isn't there for the taking anyway. I think there are massive pressures and risks on costs and the lack of a Transport Strategy doesn't help set a direction or allow for persuasive argument with government. ELLX2 is different as it eases the pain on a government scheme and is advantageous in its own right. ELLX2 would take the pressure off London Bridge at a very opportune time - that of the Thameslink reconstruction - but the service that's getting kicked out of London Bridge because there's not enough space, the Victoria to LB South London Line service, is going to get a quasi- replacement that will run from Victoria to Bellingham via Peckham Rye (or at least that's the strong recommendation of the sarf lahndon RUS). I just fear that the DfT might think that it has done its bit with that and thus ignore calls for ELLX2. Nonetheless I still can't help but feel that the Mayor should've put in more of a fight to make the original scheme happen. Perhaps it's part of some faustian bargain with the DfT whereby ELLX phase 2 gets funded? (I wish!) Or is ELLX phase 2 going to hit the rocks as well? :- ( I had half expected an announcement on this during the Labour Party conference but perhaps they're waiting for all the conferences to be over before making any announcement at all. This avoids triumphalism on the part of Boris in "winning" a battle with the government over this scheme. The last I read there was a £50m gap which is relatively peanuts in terms of government budgets but the money that's been chucked around for other reasons may be making it hard to fill the gap. If it doesn't happen now I don't see it happening for at least 10 years. Mwmbwls had already speculated that this might happen, and I have to say that I thought it unlikely - as much as the Labour government might wish to claim credit for it, Boris would be the one out there on the photo-op next to Millwall's stadium or wherever (actually perhaps more likely at Clapham Junction, people there are more likely to vote Tory!) proclaiming the arrival of a brand new line - even if he didn't publicly proclaim it as a 'Boris victory' then that's certainly how his people would spin it and how parts of the media would report it. (Of course the new SoS Transport could make Boris look awkward by demanding they appear together at a joint announcement!) I do hope it gets the go ahead - I'm encouraged by Ken's 'gaffe' on the London Tonight news programme's Mayoral election special where he said that the DfT had basically agreed to give it the go-ahead. I hope that this was the case and remains the case, and the delay in publicly announcing it is merely a bit of news management (don't give Boris any easy wins during his first 100 days) rather than the result of some rethink. The idea of running straight through to constructing phase 2 after phase 1 has been finished of course has a lot to be said for it. Phase 2 basically requires a grade separated junction at Silwood Triangle (south of Surrey Quays), and it would make every bit of sense for this to be built now whilst the line is shut, but I haven't heard of any announcements to this effect yet. I hope its coming soon... |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
GOB Class 172s | London Transport | |||
Class 378 in service | London Transport | |||
New platform markings for class 378 at Shepherd's Bush | London Transport | |||
OT - BA postpones long-haul move to T5 | London Transport | |||
Waterloo - KX post Eurostar move | London Transport |