![]() |
Primrose Hill
On Dec 14, 1:54*pm, Mr Thant
wrote: On 14 Dec, 20:10, (Neil Williams) wrote: I note that the station buildings have sadly been demolished. *Anyone know why - had they got into a dangerous state? It's only the canopy that's gone, the main station building is still there, as is the island platform (the stairs linking the two are long gone, however). Actually that's not quite true - the various single storey buildings (substations?) on the south side of the line adjacent to the station have also been recently demolished. What would it take to bring the station back into use, apart from train service? Would it be better to rebuild Primrose Hill station from scratch? |
Primrose Hill
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 14:13:57 -0800 (PST), 1506
wrote: What would it take to bring the station back into use, apart from train service? Would it be better to rebuild Primrose Hill station from scratch? Well, all that's usefully left is a platform. (The roadside building is a restaurant, I think - I was referring mainly to the canopy, though I thought perhaps wrongly that there was a building under that). I just found it (like wartime Euxton ROF in Lancashire which has gone, though it is being replaced by a newly built station at some stage, I think quite soon) fascinating - a dead station, but otherwise almost intact. I suspect if reopening was justified, building something on the in-use DC line to Euston would be better. But there are plenty of other transport options from the area, so it'd probably be pointless. Neil -- Neil Williams Put my first name before the at to reply. |
Primrose Hill
|
Primrose Hill
On 14 Dec, 22:13, 1506 wrote:
What would it take to bring the station back into use, apart from train service? *Would it be better to rebuild Primrose Hill station from scratch? There's nowhere else nearby to build platforms, so it'd have to stay where it is. But really it just needs the platform resurfacing, a replacement canopy, and stairs up to street level, either repossessing and refurbishing the original building or maybe putting in new access at the Roundhouse end, which would be marginally closer to Chalk Farm station. U |
Primrose Hill
"1506" wrote in message ... On Dec 14, 1:54 pm, Mr Thant wrote: On 14 Dec, 20:10, (Neil Williams) wrote: I note that the station buildings have sadly been demolished. Anyone know why - had they got into a dangerous state? It's only the canopy that's gone, the main station building is still there, as is the island platform (the stairs linking the two are long gone, however). Actually that's not quite true - the various single storey buildings (substations?) on the south side of the line adjacent to the station have also been recently demolished. What would it take to bring the station back into use, apart from train service? ----- Get rid of the Treasury & DfT, and the rail franchise system ? Bevan |
Primrose Hill
On Dec 14, 3:21*pm, Mr Thant
wrote: On 14 Dec, 22:13, 1506 wrote: What would it take to bring the station back into use, apart from train service? *Would it be better to rebuild Primrose Hill station from scratch? There's nowhere else nearby to build platforms, so it'd have to stay where it is. But really it just needs the platform resurfacing, a replacement canopy, and stairs up to street level, either repossessing and refurbishing the original building or maybe putting in new access at the Roundhouse end, which would be marginally closer to Chalk Farm station. U One wonders how practical it would be to extend the subsurface passage at Chalk Farm and access the Primrose Hill platform from below. IIRC the passageway is on the south side of Haverstock Hill/Chalk Farm Road. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:54 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk