| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
 |
|
Menu
| London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
| London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
February 24th 09, 07:05 PM
posted to uk.railway,misc.transport.urban-transit,uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
Thameslink ATO Specification published
On Feb 24, 5:49*pm, wrote:
On Feb 24, 5:31 pm, "Capt. Deltic" wrote: This is incredible stuff. *Especially so when you consider that Thameslink, and Crossrail, trains will run onto systems with systems (AWS), and none. Not to mention the use of ETCS SRS 2.3.0d which has a number of outstanding open points. *And I don't think anyone has tried overlaying ATO on ETCS. *I suspect that 24 trains/h will become a new Key Output 3. A further point is that, unless ETCS was operational over the whole Thameslink Network, drivers would have to switch between two operating philosophies. But not a lot different to an inbound Eurostar arriving at Dollands Moor out of the tunnel under TVM430 and suddenly adopting AWS and 4- aspects. And vice versa outbound. I shall await further questions from your good self at certain technical meetings in the near future ;o) BTW, when I quickly scanned the posts first time through I read SRS 2.3.0d as ETCS SR £2.0.3d ... now I know SR could be parsimonious at times ... Was that the development budget for the Class 319? :-P |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| NLL Infrastructure specification agreed | London Transport | |||
| How can you have a signal failure on an ATO system? | London Transport | |||
Hybrid Mode
