On Apr 23, 9:22*pm, Mizter T wrote:
On Apr 23, 8:52*pm, trundleage wrote:



On Apr 23, 5:18*pm, Mizter T wrote:

On Apr 23, 4:40*pm, trundleage wrote:

And copying verbatim as happens here is obviously not plagiarism. If
you want analysis, then you're going to have to pay for it

The comment re "potential plagiarism" relates to Mr Thant's suspicion
that Transport Briefing reworked some of his own material which
appeared on his now mothballed blog, London Connections, into a piece
it presented as its own.

Anyway, I'm not getting involved in this any further.

Oh. Thank you for that. Sometimes it can be difficult to understand
some bits said when you don't get the context. Cheers.

No worries. I wasn't quite sure if you were connected to Transport
Briefing or not, hence my slightly abrupt manner!


Nah, Got better stuff to do than run a site like that. I think this is
what should be more concerning with regards to copying verbatim. Read
the last paragraph.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/07/bu...er=rss&emc=rss