Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Another Tube strike announced
On 28 May, 17:04, MIG wrote:
On 28 May, 14:54, rail wrote: In message * * * * * Mizter T wrote: On May 28, 12:38*pm, "Recliner" wrote: About 10,000 Tube workers have voted to strike on two separate disputes over pay deals and proposed job losses. The vote, by members of the Rail, Maritime and Transport (RMT) union, was rerun after London Underground (LU) legally challenged a previous ballot. Workers will go on a 48-hour strike which will begin at 1859 BST on 9 June and end on 11 June. The strike is expected to bring havoc to the Tube network, used by more than three million passengers a day. The RMT said the ballot result was "overwhelmingly" in favour of strike action with 2,810 voting for and 488 against. Earlier LU had said it believed the issues with the RMT could be resolved without a strike. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/8071423.stm Is this perhaps the RMT flexing their muscles now that the universally liked and respected MD of London Underground, Tim O'Toole, has departed? As it is a rerun of a previous ballot, I suspect that is unlikely. *IIRC the original ballot was in favour of stike action. Assuming the BBC have got the facts correct I can't see any union going for a 5 year deal in the current situation. *The other side is that a 5% pay claim is also unrealistic. *Sounds like both sides need their heads banging together. These things are negotiating positions, which need to be followed by negotiation. *When the management won't negotiate, they refer to "demands", but how does anyone state a negotiating position that couldn't be described by someone else as a demand? Strikes are generally the result of a management refusal to negotiate, rather than the expectation of a "demand" being met in full. Strikes are the result of strikers knowing that they can extract more by threatening to strike or by actually striking. In general, tube drivers can extract a lot because management is in a very weak position. Normally, if you end up with an intransigent work force, you could build up stock, determine that strikers have resigned, and recruit new staff. You can't build stock in a service industry so it's not an option. So management have no choice but to give in to ever more extreme demands. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Tube drivers to strike on Southern strike days | London Transport | |||
Another tube strike | London Transport | |||
Strike On Central Line Announced | London Transport | |||
DLR strike off - Tube Lines infraco strike still on, but Tubeservices will still run | London Transport | |||
LU strike and possible knock-on effects on NR / LO services [was:Tube strike] | London Transport |