London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1   Report Post  
Old June 29th 09, 02:05 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: May 2005
Posts: 6,077
Default Services during Thameslink core closures

[originally posted on uk.railway]
[x-posted to uk.transport.london]

On Jun 29, 2:07*pm, Ben wrote:
I'm trying to understand what happens to FCC services north and south
when the Thameslink core closes. Do the FCC services from Bedford,
Luton and St Albans share the 4 EMT platforms at St Pancras? I
understand that the Sevenoaks services are diverted to Victoria and
the Wimbledon & Sutton trains go to London Bridge but what happens to
the Brighton services? Are the services modified in any way or do the
standard patterns operate?


Re the northern Thameslink services from St Pancras - my understanding
is that during the weekend closures of the core Thameslink route,
initially the FCC Thameslink trains were using the high-level (EMT)
platforms - indeed I saw this with my own eyes - but then there were
alterations made to signalling on the low-level route (I think it was
the installation creation of bi-directional signalling but I'm unclear
on the details) that has enabled them to use the low-level platforms
at St P (i.e. the normal Thameslink platforms), which is what they now
do.

Brighton services go to and from London Bridge, from the terminating
platforms (i.e. not from the usual through platforms 1-6).

The Wimbledon & Sutton situation is actually a bit more complicated
(and the reason for the crosspost to utl) - some of the time it seems
trains leaving London Bridge navigate the loop clockwise, then call at
Tulse Hill again before terminating at Herne Hill - then do a return
trip to London Bridge, going back anti-clockwise this time. But at
other times other arrangements apply. There's also a range of rail
replacement buses thrown in for good measure too.

I must admit that when I noticed this situation a good while back and
thought I should try and figure it all out some time, but I'm afraid
the intellectual exercise defeated me a little - not that I tried
*that* hard though! But the information FCC provides is pretty shoddy
- mentions of "Herne Hill/Tulse Hill" almost as a single entity are
very far from being clear, and I suspect many potential punters from
south London don't bother and find other means of making their
journey.

Take a look at this PDF document on the FCC website and see if you
think what it says about Wimbledon & Sutton services is clear and
easily intelligible:
http://tinyurl.com/mah7q4

Maybe I'm just a bit stupid?
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Class 700 ETCS level 2 tested in Thameslink core Recliner[_3_] London Transport 0 August 4th 16 08:40 AM
The joys of Thameslink and its rotten core e27002 aurora London Transport 2 December 3rd 15 06:44 PM
What's with the no Thameslink services today? martin j London Transport 9 January 12th 10 10:30 PM
6 Thameslink services to avoid after March 2009 Sky Rider London Transport 0 October 31st 08 04:53 PM
Blockade of cross London Thameslink services from Saturday 11th September 2004 until 2005 Robin Mayes London Transport 42 September 21st 04 03:54 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:56 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017