Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:11:59 +0800
"DW downunder" reply@newsgroup wrote: I was informed by a Mr Mann, the project's chief engineer, that the cost differential between bored 4.6m tunnels and bored 6m tunnels was negligible. This is in an area of saturated dune sands, clays and silts with little sedimetary rock and no hard rock - so tunnel lining performance parameters Cue Bruce on how you must also be a profoundly ignorant ****wit as this clearly is impossible. Obviously an extra 1.4m would raise the price so high no one in their right mind could state the cost difference was negligable? Isn't that right Mr Fantasy Tunnel Designer Bruce? (Though I suspect the only "tunnel" he's ever been involved in building is making one out of a rolled up newspaper) B2003 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Boris: Crossrail not yet "signed, sealed and delivered" [was:Transport Secretary vows to finish Crossrail] | London Transport | |||
Optimum configuration of Crossrail (Was: Diesel Electric Trains on CrossRail) | London Transport | |||
Optimum configuration of Crossrail (Was: Diesel Electric Trains on CrossRail) | London Transport |