Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Recliner coughed up some electrons that declared:
"Paul Scott" wrote in message news ![]() I reckon there could be some debate about the door setup, I don't see how two sets of double doors in the centre of each carriage provides 25% more doors than a 1/3 - 2/3 set up, unless of course the carriages are somewhat shorter than 20m... Yes, as with any articulated train, the carriages will be much shorter than the equivalent non-articulated version. Think of two sets of double doors between *each* pair of bogies, rather than alternate pairs of bogies. Is that the best picture they could do: http://www.transport.alstom.com/home...5583_59675.jpg ? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
London Crossrail likely to work any better than Thameslink? | London Transport | |||
Boris: Crossrail not yet "signed, sealed and delivered" [was:Transport Secretary vows to finish Crossrail] | London Transport | |||
Exciting news on Thameslink 2000 (now "Thameslink Project") | London Transport | |||
Thameslink before Crossrail? | London Transport | |||
Optimum configuration of Crossrail (Was: Diesel Electric Trains on CrossRail) | London Transport |