![]() |
Crossrail: Paddington reversers
In the thread "Crossrail preferred route" earlier this month, I raised the
question of what happens to the 6 tph westbound after 12 tph go to Richmond (of which 4 tph continue to Kingston) and 6 tph go to Heathrow. At the exhibition in Paddington Library this week, a Crossrail representative said that the remaining 6 tph would terminate at Paddington. They would then run empty up to the surface where some reversing sidings would be provided. The Crossrail station at Paddington will have only 2 platforms. This means that in the peak 24 tph westbound service, every fourth train will have to be emptied on the sole westbound track, presumably with tube-style positive checks that each of the 10 cars is empty, before proceeding to the sidings. Is this practicable when the service interval is 2.5 minutes? The only similar situation on LU that I can think of is at Rayners Lane, but I think that the combined Piccadilly/Metropolitan frequency there is not as demanding. Are there any other examples of trains in a frequent service being terminated on the same track as following through services? -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
Crossrail: Paddington reversers
"Richard J." wrote in message
... In the thread "Crossrail preferred route" earlier this month, I raised the question of what happens to the 6 tph westbound after 12 tph go to Richmond (of which 4 tph continue to Kingston) and 6 tph go to Heathrow. At the exhibition in Paddington Library this week, a Crossrail representative said that the remaining 6 tph would terminate at Paddington. They are saying that, but I don't think they mean it. They would then run empty up to the surface where some reversing sidings would be provided. Are there any other examples of trains in a frequent service being terminated on the same track as following through services? Central Line at Liverpool Street (where an incompletely cleared train was responsible for a fatality a few years back, but I don't know what the frequency was at the hour of the fatality). Bakerloo at Queens Park. Kennington Charing Cross branch. Somewhere on the Jubilee.... Willesden Green, I think. -- John Rowland - Spamtrapped Transport Plans for the London Area, updated 2001 http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...69/tpftla.html A man's vehicle is a symbol of his manhood. That's why my vehicle's the Piccadilly Line - It's the size of a county and it comes every two and a half minutes |
Crossrail: Paddington reversers
"John Rowland" wrote in message ... "Richard J." wrote in message ... In the thread "Crossrail preferred route" earlier this month, I raised the question of what happens to the 6 tph westbound after 12 tph go to Richmond (of which 4 tph continue to Kingston) and 6 tph go to Heathrow. At the exhibition in Paddington Library this week, a Crossrail representative said that the remaining 6 tph would terminate at Paddington. They are saying that, but I don't think they mean it. They expressed doubts about the cost-benefit of extending to, say, Slough. Although this makes the line unbalanced, it supports the regeneration projects in the east. They would then run empty up to the surface where some reversing sidings would be provided. Are there any other examples of trains in a frequent service being terminated on the same track as following through services? Central Line at Liverpool Street (where an incompletely cleared train was responsible for a fatality a few years back, but I don't know what the frequency was at the hour of the fatality). Bakerloo at Queens Park. Kennington Charing Cross branch. Somewhere on the Jubilee.... Willesden Green, I think. Thanks. Was it the Liverpool Street fatality that led to the current rules about checking every car? And were the Central & Bakerloo timetables altered to allow for the longer dwell time when tipping out? -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
Crossrail: Paddington reversers
Central Line at Liverpool Street (where an incompletely cleared train was
responsible for a fatality a few years back, but I don't know what the frequency was at the hour of the fatality). What on earth happened? how did an incompletely cleared train lead to a death? |
Crossrail: Paddington reversers
"dan" wrote in message om... Central Line at Liverpool Street (where an incompletely cleared train was responsible for a fatality a few years back, but I don't know what the frequency was at the hour of the fatality). What on earth happened? how did an incompletely cleared train lead to a death? The Tube driver killed him? |
Crossrail: Paddington reversers
Central Line at Liverpool Street (where an incompletely cleared train was responsible for a fatality a few years back, but I don't know what the frequency was at the hour of the fatality). Bakerloo at Queens Park. Kennington Charing Cross branch. Somewhere on the Jubilee.... Willesden Green, I think. wasn't it between 28tph and 33tph |
Crossrail: Paddington reversers
"Ed Crowley" wrote in message .. . "dan" wrote in message om... Central Line at Liverpool Street (where an incompletely cleared train was responsible for a fatality a few years back, but I don't know what the frequency was at the hour of the fatality). What on earth happened? how did an incompletely cleared train lead to a death? The Tube driver killed him? As was the practice on lul, trains that were going to sidings and comeing back out again was an anouncement over the trains PA. at liverpool st the drive made the anouncement and after he thought the train was emptied he closed the doors went into the siding. on the way into the siding a bloke on train woke up and tried to leave the train by jumping out between the carridges onto the platform. but he mistimed it and jumped out into the tunnel. hit the wall and fell under the last carridge. now all trains have to be manually check before reversings via sidings. |
Crossrail: Paddington reversers
"Rob" wrote in message ... "Ed Crowley" wrote in message .. . "dan" wrote in message om... Central Line at Liverpool Street (where an incompletely cleared train was responsible for a fatality a few years back, but I don't know what the frequency was at the hour of the fatality). What on earth happened? how did an incompletely cleared train lead to a death? The Tube driver killed him? As was the practice on lul, trains that were going to sidings and comeing back out again was an anouncement over the trains PA. at liverpool st the drive made the anouncement and after he thought the train was emptied he closed the doors went into the siding. on the way into the siding a bloke on train woke up and tried to leave the train by jumping out between the carridges onto the platform. but he mistimed it and jumped out into the tunnel. hit the wall and fell under the last carridge. now all trains have to be manually check before reversings via sidings. What a pillock. He could have used the alarm! The gene pool is the real winner here. |
That Liverpoool Street fatality a few years ago (was Crossrail: Paddington reversers)
"Rob" wrote in message
... As was the practice on lul, trains that were going to sidings and comeing back out again was an anouncement over the trains PA. at liverpool st the drive made the anouncement and after he thought the train was emptied he closed the doors went into the siding. on the way into the siding a bloke on train woke up and tried to leave the train by jumping out between the carridges onto the platform. I don't remember it like that... ISTR he was just walking through the train to the driver, but as he was passing between two carriages the train went around an extreme curve to enter the sidings between the running lines, and he fell between the carriages. -- John Rowland - Spamtrapped Transport Plans for the London Area, updated 2001 http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...69/tpftla.html A man's vehicle is a symbol of his manhood. That's why my vehicle's the Piccadilly Line - It's the size of a county and it comes every two and a half minutes |
That Liverpoool Street fatality a few years ago (was Crossrail: Paddington reversers)
"John Rowland" wrote in message ... "Rob" wrote in message ... As was the practice on lul, trains that were going to sidings and comeing back out again was an anouncement over the trains PA. at liverpool st the drive made the anouncement and after he thought the train was emptied he closed the doors went into the siding. on the way into the siding a bloke on train woke up and tried to leave the train by jumping out between the carridges onto the platform. I don't remember it like that... ISTR he was just walking through the train to the driver, but as he was passing between two carriages the train went around an extreme curve to enter the sidings between the running lines, and he fell between the carriages. That is the version we were told during training (plus the gory details) And as for someone's comment about the gene-pool, IIRC the young man was a medical student. Kat |
Gory details - you do *NOT* have to read it!
"Kat" wrote in message ... "John Rowland" wrote in message ... "Rob" wrote in message ... As was the practice on lul, trains that were going to sidings and comeing back out again was an anouncement over the trains PA. at liverpool st the drive made the anouncement and after he thought the train was emptied he closed the doors went into the siding. on the way into the siding a bloke on train woke up and tried to leave the train by jumping out between the carridges onto the platform. I don't remember it like that... ISTR he was just walking through the train to the driver, but as he was passing between two carriages the train went around an extreme curve to enter the sidings between the running lines, and he fell between the carriages. That is the version we were told during training (plus the gory details) And as for someone's comment about the gene-pool, IIRC the young man was a medical student. As the only person that knew for sure what he was intending to do ended up with his neck on the right hand running rail with 5 carriages wheels going over it resulting in it being the thickness of a rizla paper, nobody will ever know for sure if he was trying to leave the train or make contact with the driver. |
Crossrail: Paddington reversers
"Rob" wrote in message ...
Central Line at Liverpool Street (where an incompletely cleared train was responsible for a fatality a few years back, but I don't know what the frequency was at the hour of the fatality). Bakerloo at Queens Park. Kennington Charing Cross branch. Somewhere on the Jubilee.... Willesden Green, I think. wasn't it between 28tph and 33tph Isn't there a loop at kennington? There used to be. next part not for the squeamish...... seriously.... Isn't that tunnel incident the one where the guy tried to get out between carraiges when he realised it had terminated and the tunnel went round a corner and squashed him? Always men isn't it, we're not too clever. I can't imagine that happening on a passenger-laden train. |
Crossrail: Paddington reversers
|
Crossrail: Paddington reversers
"CJC" wrote in message
om... Kennington Charing Cross branch. Isn't there a loop at kennington? Yes. So? The train still has to be cleared with the following train queueing behind it, just as it would at Paddington Crossrail -- John Rowland - Spamtrapped Transport Plans for the London Area, updated 2001 http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...69/tpftla.html A man's vehicle is a symbol of his manhood. That's why my vehicle's the Piccadilly Line - It's the size of a county and it comes every two and a half minutes |
Crossrail: Paddington reversers
"John Rowland" wrote in message
... "CJC" wrote in message om... Kennington Charing Cross branch. Isn't there a loop at kennington? Yes. So? The train still has to be cleared with the following train queueing behind it, just as it would at Paddington Crossrail LUL trains don't have an enclosed gangway between their very closely coupled cars, and significant gaps can open up between them on sharp curves through which a human could fall, the major factor in how the unfortunate gentleman at Liverpool Street met his end. Modern mainline rolling stock by contrast has enclosed corridor connections, so it can be made nearly impossible for someone to fall out of a moving train (certainly no more in a siding move than anywhere in normal passenger service). As long as such standards are followed , and the move to a reversing siding is protected to full passenger signalling standards (TCs clear, FPLs bolted, flank traps and forward train protection proved in place) then I can see no reason a case couldn't be made not to fully check the train before proceding, as long as a walk through is carried out once berthed in the siding and a safe procedure for removing people found is in place. -- Mark http://www.maprail.com/ |
Crossrail: Paddington reversers
"Mark Townend" wrote in message ... "John Rowland" wrote in message ... "CJC" wrote in message om... Kennington Charing Cross branch. Isn't there a loop at kennington? Yes. So? The train still has to be cleared with the following train queueing behind it, just as it would at Paddington Crossrail LUL trains don't have an enclosed gangway between their very closely coupled cars, and significant gaps can open up between them on sharp curves through which a human could fall, the major factor in how the unfortunate gentleman at Liverpool Street met his end. Modern mainline rolling stock by contrast has enclosed corridor connections, so it can be made nearly impossible for someone to fall out of a moving train (certainly no more in a siding move than anywhere in normal passenger service). As long as such standards are followed , and the move to a reversing siding is protected to full passenger signalling standards (TCs clear, FPLs bolted, flank traps and forward train protection proved in place) then I can see no reason a case couldn't be made not to fully check the train before proceding, as long as a walk through is carried out once berthed in the siding and a safe procedure for removing people found is in place. This seems to be the case already on the DLR. The end doors need a key to open them from the inside, so the passenger area is secure. I didn't notice any walk-through before the doors were closed at Bank yesterday and the train departed for the siding. However, with large numbers of foreign visitors likely to use Crossrail to get to Heathrow, reliance on a PA announcement would not be sufficient to dislodge everyone. They will need extra platform staff at Paddington IMO. -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
Crossrail: Paddington reversers
"John Rowland" wrote in message
... "CJC" wrote in message om... Kennington Charing Cross branch. Isn't there a loop at kennington? Yes. So? The train still has to be cleared with the following train queueing behind it, just as it would at Paddington Crossrail If they were going to reverse some of the trains at Paddington, would it not be obvious to put in a platform in the Paddington station specifically for terminating trains. Edgware Road might be an inspiration. -- Terry Harper, Web Co-ordinator, The Omnibus Society http://www.omnibussoc.org E-mail: URL: http://www.terry.harper.btinternet.co.uk/ |
Crossrail: Paddington reversers
"Richard J." wrote in message ...
However, with large numbers of foreign visitors likely to use Crossrail to get to Heathrow, reliance on a PA announcement would not be sufficient to dislodge everyone. They will need extra platform staff at Paddington IMO. CCTV could play a useful role in checking the cars. It is likely that cameras will be installed for security purposes, in any case, so it may be possible to use them for this purpose also. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:29 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk