Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
LT lies
was at paddington today waiting for circle line to south ken.
Wimbledon service rolls in and announcer says the next Circle is at Kings Cross at least ten minutes away. Get on and at the next stop Bayswater stick my head out. Next circle line is 1 minute away. I know that they do not know when the next train is coming because of the antiquated sinalling system but why do they have to lie. If they dont know then dont say anything. Grrrrr |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
LT lies
On 22 Nov, 21:45, wrote:
I know that they do not know when the next train is coming because of the antiquated sinalling system but why do they have to lie. If they dont know then dont say anything. The Circle/H&C depot is at Hammersmith, so anti-clockwise Circle Line trains start service by running to Edgware Road (as H&Cs) and reversing, which I'd guess is what happened here. So the announcer at Paddington was right as far as existing trains go, but could have been told about the new one entering service. U -- http://londonconnections.blogspot.com/ A blog about transport projects in London |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
LT lies
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
LT lies
On Nov 22, 10:35 pm, Paul Corfield wrote:
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 13:45:16 -0800 (PST), wrote: was at paddington today waiting for circle line to south ken. Wimbledon service rolls in and announcer says the next Circle is at Kings Cross at least ten minutes away. Get on and at the next stop Bayswater stick my head out. Next circle line is 1 minute away. I know that they do not know when the next train is coming because of the antiquated sinalling system but why do they have to lie. If they dont know then dont say anything. Grrrrr I don't know why you leap to the conclusion that someone lied. I can't begin to understand why a member of staff making a public announcement would do that. The most likely explanation is that a decision was taken to reverse a train at Edgware Road or one was brought out from the sidings or taken off the Wimbledon service and made into a Circle Line in order to fill the gap. As you acknowledge the signalling system is not very sophisticated in that part of the network. Given Paddington is about 1 minute from Edgware Road it is entirely plausible that a signal had not been cleared for the "new" Circle Line train and that would not have triggered the platform display or Trackernet to indicate an imminent arrival at Paddington. Is it still the case that the indicators at Paddington don't show any trains as due till they are already in sight? I haven't been there for a while. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
LT lies
On Nov 22, 10:53 pm, MIG wrote:
On Nov 22, 10:35 pm, Paul Corfield wrote: On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 13:45:16 -0800 (PST), wrote: was at paddington today waiting for circle line to south ken. Wimbledon service rolls in and announcer says the next Circle is at Kings Cross at least ten minutes away. Get on and at the next stop Bayswater stick my head out. Next circle line is 1 minute away. I know that they do not know when the next train is coming because of the antiquated sinalling system but why do they have to lie. If they dont know then dont say anything. Grrrrr I don't know why you leap to the conclusion that someone lied. I can't begin to understand why a member of staff making a public announcement would do that. The most likely explanation is that a decision was taken to reverse a train at Edgware Road or one was brought out from the sidings or taken off the Wimbledon service and made into a Circle Line in order to fill the gap. As you acknowledge the signalling system is not very sophisticated in that part of the network. Given Paddington is about 1 minute from Edgware Road it is entirely plausible that a signal had not been cleared for the "new" Circle Line train and that would not have triggered the platform display or Trackernet to indicate an imminent arrival at Paddington. Is it still the case that the indicators at Paddington don't show any trains as due till they are already in sight? I haven't been there for a while. That is still the case. The trains appear on the Dot Matrix when the train is past Praed St junction. As to Paddington, the Information Booth Assistant will look at Trackernet (not always very good, but better than what it was) for the next train, and coupled with any information from the Line Control Service Operator make the announcements. From past experience the train most likely came up from Hammersmith to reverse and form an anti- clockwise Circle. Trains at Edgware Road on the Trackernet do often vanish so it may have come round the circle, also when the Train Description is changed this would not appear on Trackernet either, so they wouldn't know without phoning Edgware Road station, what that train was doing. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
LT lies
On Nov 22, 10:35 pm, Paul Corfield wrote:
I don't know why you leap to the conclusion that someone lied. I can't begin to understand why a member of staff making a public announcement would do that. I doubt staff lie deliberately but I've been in a number of situations where they've given blatantly wrong information. My most recent experience was a driver who told us the line was suspended and the train was terminating at its current station. 5 minutes later after no station announcements the train headed off again with a new driver. Now either the signalman was full of it that day or the driver just wanted to knock off early and needed an excuse to give us pax. B2003 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
LT lies
"Boltar" wrote in message ... On Nov 22, 10:35 pm, Paul Corfield wrote: I don't know why you leap to the conclusion that someone lied. I can't begin to understand why a member of staff making a public announcement would do that. I doubt staff lie deliberately but I've been in a number of situations where they've given blatantly wrong information. My most recent experience was a driver who told us the line was suspended and the train was terminating at its current station. 5 minutes later after no station announcements the train headed off again with a new driver. Now either the signalman was full of it that day or the driver just wanted to knock off early and needed an excuse to give us pax. Or the line actually was suspended, the driver was due for relief and whilst the relief was being effected whatever had caused the suspension cleared and the train therefore continued to it's booked destination. Out of interest where and on what date did this occur? I'll try to find out what happened for you. -- Cheers, Steve. Change jealous to sad to reply. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
LT lies
On Nov 23, 7:02 pm, "Steve Dulieu"
wrote: Or the line actually was suspended, the driver was due for relief and whilst the relief was being effected whatever had caused the suspension cleared and the train therefore continued to it's booked destination. Out of interest where and on what date did this occur? I'll try to find out what happened for you. Was at arnos grove going north around 4pm. Can't remember the date offhand, was about a week ago. He actually said it was suspended because there were men working on the points north of the station. Well I couldn't see anyone and the next set are north of southgate. *shrug* B2003 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
LT lies
In message
, Boltar writes Or the line actually was suspended, the driver was due for relief and whilst the relief was being effected whatever had caused the suspension cleared and the train therefore continued to it's booked destination. Out of interest where and on what date did this occur? I'll try to find out what happened for you. Was at arnos grove going north around 4pm. Can't remember the date offhand, was about a week ago. He actually said it was suspended because there were men working on the points north of the station. Well I couldn't see anyone and the next set are north of southgate. *shrug* Ah yes, we did have that the other week. There was a point failure with the new points at the east end of the platform and the controller suspended the service. 10 minutes later he ran a train through to Cockfosters - I know that as I drove that first train! As it happens, the driver you so blithely accuse of wanting to get off early had just picked up the train fresh from another driver who was about 50 mins late finishing. He was as surprised as us all when the signaller took a release (reset the eastbound starting signal to danger - without warning) and the Line Controller then told him that the service was suspended and that train was to go back west. Just goes to show, when you know the full story. -- Steve Fitzgerald has now left the building. You will find him in London's Docklands, E16, UK (please use the reply to address for email) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
LT lies
On Nov 25, 1:23 pm, Boltar wrote:
On Nov 23, 7:02 pm, "Steve Dulieu" wrote: Or the line actually was suspended, the driver was due for relief and whilst the relief was being effected whatever had caused the suspension cleared and the train therefore continued to it's booked destination. Out of interest where and on what date did this occur? I'll try to find out what happened for you. Was at arnos grove going north around 4pm. Can't remember the date offhand, was about a week ago. He actually said it was suspended because there were men working on the points north of the station. Well I couldn't see anyone and the next set are north of southgate. *shrug* The people who were meant to be working on the points were being persecured by MI5. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Damned lies needed | London Transport | |||
Lies, Damned Lies, Statistics and Claims by Spanish-owned BAA | London Transport |