Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
And is the inclusion of overground services to Heathrow an indication that
Heathrow Connect will be an Oysterable service? Paul Scott is correct - Heathrow Connect beyond H&H is not covered by Oyster. Having spent the morning flicking through the "official" media docs. Things that caught my eye a 1) No mention of OEPs. At all. TfL have since told me they'll only affect 0.04% of passengers which presumably is justification for their low key coverage. 2) All existing NR PAYG arrangements are to operate under the "TfL Rate" fares-wise, which makes sense. 3) There's some rather nice tables detailing the total traffic figures for the top 10 stations of each London Franchise 4) The new "Oyster Coverage" map is indeed pretty epic. I've cut it out and put it on the London Reconnections post. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 23 Nov, 13:50, John Bull wrote:
And is the inclusion of overground services to Heathrow an indication that Heathrow Connect will be an Oysterable service? Paul Scott is correct - Heathrow Connect beyond H&H is not covered by Oyster. Having spent the morning flicking through the "official" media docs. Things that caught my eye a 1) No mention of OEPs. At all. TfL have since told me they'll only affect 0.04% of passengers which presumably is justification for their low key coverage. Yes but it will generate 100% of the bad publicity when people start being penalty fared !! |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 23 Nov, 14:02, trainmanUK wrote:
On 23 Nov, 13:50, John Bull wrote: And is the inclusion of overground services to Heathrow an indication that Heathrow Connect will be an Oysterable service? Paul Scott is correct - Heathrow Connect beyond H&H is not covered by Oyster. Having spent the morning flicking through the "official" media docs. Things that caught my eye a 1) No mention of OEPs. At all. TfL have since told me they'll only affect 0.04% of passengers which presumably is justification for their low key coverage. Yes but it will generate 100% of the bad publicity when people start being penalty fared !! Someone should point out that it may be 0.04% of journeys, but not necessarily 0.04% of passengers. Everyone with a travelcard may extend beyond their zones for 0.04% of their journeys or something, but if they get screwed the first time they do, that's a lot of "customers" who won't be very gruntled about Oyster. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 23, 2:08*pm, MIG wrote:
On 23 Nov, 14:02, trainmanUK wrote: On 23 Nov, 13:50, John Bull wrote: And is the inclusion of overground services to Heathrow an indication that Heathrow Connect will be an Oysterable service? Paul Scott is correct - Heathrow Connect beyond H&H is not covered by Oyster. Having spent the morning flicking through the "official" media docs. Things that caught my eye a 1) No mention of OEPs. At all. TfL have since told me they'll only affect 0.04% of passengers which presumably is justification for their low key coverage. Yes but it will generate 100% of the bad publicity when people start being penalty fared !! Someone should point out that it may be 0.04% of journeys, but not necessarily 0.04% of passengers. *Everyone with a travelcard may extend beyond their zones for 0.04% of their journeys or something, but if they get screwed the first time they do, that's a lot of "customers" who won't be very gruntled about Oyster. Aye - "passengers" was their term, but its a very vague one. In fairness, I can understand where they're coming from in playing down OEPs. But as has been commented up-thread, it seems a recipe for negative feedback down the line when Elsie 85 from Clapton gets her photo in the paper waving a penalty notice in one hand and an Oyster Card in the other because "no one told 'er about no extension permit in the paper." |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
, at 07:12:32 on Mon, 23 Nov 2009, John Bull remarked: In fairness, I can understand where they're coming from in playing down OEPs. OK, I give up. What's an OEP? http://acronyms.thefreedictionary.com/OEP -- Roland Perry |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Roland Perry" wrote in message
... OK, I give up. What's an OEP? I was petrified of asking that here in case I got a Malcolm Tucker-style bollocking, so I searched around. It means "Oyster Extension Permit". I think it only applies to people with Travelcards on their oyster who want to go outside their permitted zone (or something like that!). http://groups.google.com/group/uk.tr...781213104d6d26 Ian |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
, John Bull writes In fairness, I can understand where they're coming from in playing down OEPs. But as has been commented up-thread, it seems a recipe for negative feedback down the line when Elsie 85 from Clapton gets her photo in the paper waving a penalty notice in one hand and an Oyster Card in the other because "no one told 'er about no extension permit in the paper." Elsie 85 from Clapton is highly unlikely to be PF'd as she would be travelling on her Freedom pass ! -- Paul Terry |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 23, 3:36*pm, Paul Terry wrote:
In message , John Bull writes In fairness, I can understand where they're coming from in playing down OEPs. But as has been commented up-thread, it seems a recipe for negative feedback down the line when Elsie 85 from Clapton gets her photo in the paper waving a penalty notice in one hand and an Oyster Card in the other because "no one told 'er about no extension permit in the paper." Elsie 85 from Clapton is highly unlikely to be PF'd as she would be travelling on her Freedom pass ! -- Paul Terry Christ - don't tell Elsie that or she'll be in the papers AGAIN. Yeah, sorry, bad example age-wise! |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 23, 3:47 pm, John Bull wrote:
On Nov 23, 3:36 pm, Paul Terry wrote: Elsie 85 from Clapton is highly unlikely to be PF'd as she would be travelling on her Freedom pass ! Christ - don't tell Elsie that or she'll be in the papers AGAIN. Yeah, sorry, bad example age-wise! Or perhaps you meant Elsie from Clapton, Somerset who is in London on a trip? -- Abi |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
, at 05:50:38 on Mon, 23 Nov 2009, John Bull remarked: And is the inclusion of overground services to Heathrow an indication that Heathrow Connect will be an Oysterable service? Paul Scott is correct - Heathrow Connect beyond H&H is not covered by Oyster. Now that a higher resolution copy of the map has appeared here, there's a disclaimer confirming this. Unfortunately, it seems to make a liar of the Minister who posted this morning: "Just joined Lord Adonis and Boris Johnson to launch Oyster pay as you go for ALL overground services in London from January 2nd." His emphasis on "ALL". Or is there some microscopic wriggle-room that decides a Heathrow Connect train is "overground" as far as H&H, but then becomes something else (surely not "underground, wombling free") thereafter? -- Roland Perry |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Nice announcement | London Transport | |||
Announcement at Holborn | London Transport | |||
Olympic Announcement 'Event' | London Transport | |||
Misleading article on Crossrail announcement | London Transport | |||
New? announcement (Victoria Stn) "Remember to take your Medication" | London Transport |