Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
London Travelwatch on OEPs
On Feb 5, 4:26*pm, wrote: (Mizter T) wrote: I should add, I'm not planning on traipsing round the railways of London actively looking for a confrontation! Just that, I wouldn't let the lack of an OEP deter me from travelling at all. The problem is, of course, that the blurb says an OEP must be obtained before travelling, so it puts people who're trying to do the right thing in an awkward position - but I'd have no qualms about travelling should an OEP not be obtainable from my starting station (if there was a newsagents directly next to the station then maybe, I might get one - but if I wasn't buying anything else it'd feel a bit weird to go in there to ask for a 'free' ticket, though I suppose along with people coming in to check their Oyster PAYG balance and not buying anything it could be said to be part of the quid-pro-quo when you agree to retail Oyster products, given the number of people it does bring through the door). I'm still struggling to envisage a typical journey which both requires an OEP and starts at an NR station. Really? You said something similar in another thread. In that case I think you're being completely devoid of any imagination, to be blunt! Ok, Forest Hill (z3) to East Croydon (z5) - pax holds a z1-3 Travelcard for their commute into town (train to London Bridge then Tube), but they want to go to Croydon to do some shopping. Westcombe Park (z3) to Charing Cross (z1) - pax holds a z2&3 Travelcard for their commute to Canary Wharf (train and DLR), but they want to head into town. Putney (z2/3) to Richmond (z4) - pax holds a z1&2 Travelcard for their commute into town (train to Waterloo then W&C line into the City), but they want to go and have a walk and drink by the river. I could go on, and on, and on, but I won't! There are a gazillion examples. (I'm wondering if you've got the wrong end of the stick on this OEP business?) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
London Travelwatch on OEPs
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
London Travelwatch on OEPs
On 5 Feb, 17:22, Mizter T wrote:
On Feb 5, 4:26*pm, wrote: (Mizter T) wrote: I should add, I'm not planning on traipsing round the railways of London actively looking for a confrontation! Just that, I wouldn't let the lack of an OEP deter me from travelling at all. The problem is, of course, that the blurb says an OEP must be obtained before travelling, so it puts people who're trying to do the right thing in an awkward position - but I'd have no qualms about travelling should an OEP not be obtainable from my starting station (if there was a newsagents directly next to the station then maybe, I might get one - but if I wasn't buying anything else it'd feel a bit weird to go in there to ask for a 'free' ticket, though I suppose along with people coming in to check their Oyster PAYG balance and not buying anything it could be said to be part of the quid-pro-quo when you agree to retail Oyster products, given the number of people it does bring through the door). I'm still struggling to envisage a typical journey which both requires an OEP and starts at an NR station. Really? You said something similar in another thread. In that case I think you're being completely devoid of any imagination, to be blunt! Ok, Forest Hill (z3) to East Croydon (z5) - pax holds a z1-3 Travelcard for their commute into town (train to London Bridge then Tube), but they want to go to Croydon to do some shopping. Westcombe Park (z3) to Charing Cross (z1) - pax holds a z2&3 Travelcard for their commute to Canary Wharf (train and DLR), but they want to head into town. Putney (z2/3) to Richmond (z4) - pax holds a z1&2 Travelcard for their commute into town (train to Waterloo then W&C line into the City), but they want to go and have a walk and drink by the river. I could go on, and on, and on, but I won't! There are a gazillion examples. Ang on; aren't those just examples where they'd be on PAYG for the whole journey? The typical situation is you've got zone 1 - 2 and get on at Charing Cross heading for Slade Green. You need the OEP if gripped between Greenwich and Slade Green. The journey begins at Charing Cross, which is an NR station. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
London Travelwatch on OEPs
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
London Travelwatch on OEPs
On 5 Feb, 23:11, wrote:
In article , (MIG) wrote: Ang on; aren't those just examples where they'd be on PAYG for the whole journey? Good point. Except that I was forgetting that the travelcard is still valid at the point of touching in, so the OEP still needed. It's just not as common as starting the journey at a London Terminal. The typical situation is you've got zone 1 - 2 and get on at Charing Cross heading for Slade Green. *You need the OEP if gripped between Greenwich and Slade Green. The journey begins at Charing Cross, which is an NR station. But has an adjacent underground station. Many users will approach it such that calling at a tube station won't be a major inconvenience. -- Colin Rosenstiel |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
London Travelwatch on OEPs
In message
, MIG writes On 5 Feb, 17:22, Mizter T wrote: Putney (z2/3) to Richmond (z4) - pax holds a z1&2 Travelcard for their commute into town (train to Waterloo then W&C line into the City), but they want to go and have a walk and drink by the river. Ang on; aren't those just examples where they'd be on PAYG for the whole journey? That's exactly what a lot of people would assume, because that is how things work when using a travelcard + PAYG on TfL. In fact, your comment goes to the very heart of the confusion about OEPs. Unlike TfL, almost all of whose stations are gated, the TOCs weren't willing to take the revenue risk of people who travel beyond their zones simply not touching out at one of their many ungated stations, and thus not paying anything for travelling out of zone. Hence, an OEP is required. Touching in at Waterloo (in this example) deducts a maximum cash fare, despite the fact there is a Z1/Z2 travelcard on the Oyster. The actual PAYG fare is then adjusted when touching out (at Ricmond in Zone 4) - basically resulting in a charge from the boundary of Zone 2 to Zone 4. The theory is that if you are gripped on NR while travelling out of zone without an OEP, you will be charged a penalty fare. The OEP acts as evidence that money has already been deducted for travelling out of zone when you touched in at Waterloo (*). As has been said, there is considerable doubt that an appeal would find such a penalty charge fair or even legal, given that a maximum cash fare has already been paid at the start of the journey. It has been said (I think by Caroline Pidgeon at Mayor's Questions) that some TOCs are deliberately not issuing penalty fares in these circumstances in order to avoid the courts declaring the entire OEP system invalid. (* If you change your mind and get out at Putney, in Zone 2, the cash fare is reimbursed when you touch out, and the OEP stays on the Oyster for when you next want to travel out of zone). -- Paul Terry |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
London Travelwatch on OEPs
In message , Paul Corfield
writes On Sat, 6 Feb 2010 09:01:24 +0000, Paul Terry wrote: Hence, an OEP is required. Touching in at Waterloo (in this example) deducts a maximum cash fare, despite the fact there is a Z1/Z2 travelcard on the Oyster. The actual PAYG fare is then adjusted when touching out (at Ricmond in Zone 4) - basically resulting in a charge from the boundary of Zone 2 to Zone 4. No - *if* an OEP is set before travel in this example then a "mixed travel" entry charge being deducted. This is less than the maximum cash fare - being £4.20 peak and £3.40 off peak. How does that square with the statement in the TfL staff briefing that... "Passengers must remember to touch out when they have an Oyster Extension Permit on their card. If they do not, they will be charged a maximum Oyster fare." ? And the statement on http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tickets/oysteronline/5823.aspx about PAYG that ... "When you touch in an entry charge of up to £6.50 will be deducted from your Oyster card." ? Does having an OEP reduce the entry charge to the figures you quote above? And why make a mixed-mode entry charge when in many cases the journey is likely to be entirely on NR? Sorry for pedantry but trying to get the terminology right is important on such a complicated issue. No problem - you are right to do so. But I get the feeling that there is still a huge lack of clarity about the operation of OEPs. -- Paul Terry |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
London Travelwatch on OEPs
"Paul Terry" wrote in message ... In message , Paul Corfield writes On Sat, 6 Feb 2010 09:01:24 +0000, Paul Terry wrote: Hence, an OEP is required. Touching in at Waterloo (in this example) deducts a maximum cash fare, despite the fact there is a Z1/Z2 travelcard on the Oyster. The actual PAYG fare is then adjusted when touching out (at Ricmond in Zone 4) - basically resulting in a charge from the boundary of Zone 2 to Zone 4. No - *if* an OEP is set before travel in this example then a "mixed travel" entry charge being deducted. This is less than the maximum cash fare - being £4.20 peak and £3.40 off peak. How does that square with the statement in the TfL staff briefing that... "Passengers must remember to touch out when they have an Oyster Extension Permit on their card. If they do not, they will be charged a maximum Oyster fare." ? And the statement on http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tickets/oysteronline/5823.aspx about PAYG that ... "When you touch in an entry charge of up to £6.50 will be deducted from your Oyster card." ? Does having an OEP reduce the entry charge to the figures you quote above? And why make a mixed-mode entry charge when in many cases the journey is likely to be entirely on NR? I think the reasoning is that all travelcard seasons cover at least 2 zones. Therefore the maximum you can pay as an extension is 4 zones including Z1, which is £4.20/£3.40 (ignoring trips to Amersham etc). Peter Smyth |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
London Travelwatch on OEPs
In message , Peter Smyth
writes "Paul Terry" wrote in message ... And why make a mixed-mode entry charge when in many cases the journey is likely to be entirely on NR? I think the reasoning is that all travelcard seasons cover at least 2 zones. Therefore the maximum you can pay as an extension is 4 zones including Z1, which is £4.20/£3.40 (ignoring trips to Amersham etc). Ah, that would make sense. Thanks. -- Paul Terry |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
London Travelwatch on OEPs
In message , Paul Corfield
writes Yes and note the words "up to". There are all sorts of different charges depending on what zone you are in, what time of day it is and whether an OEP is present. TfL do not publish all of these charges on the web hence the "up to" statement. I am able to see other info which is how I know the other charges exist. Ah, thanks. -- Paul Terry |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Oyster Extension Permits (OEPs) | London Transport | |||
Great Northern inner surburban services - London travelwatch reponse to RUS | London Transport | |||
London TravelWatch criticises cash fare rises in London | London Transport | |||
London Travelwatch forum dead | London Transport |