![]() |
teacup
|
teacup
On Feb 26, 2:39 pm, wrote: In article , (Roland Perry) wrote: In message , at 22:40:02 on Thu, 25 Feb 2010, Richard J. remarked: [snip] That's a different argument. What journey are you considering now? Same one - St Pancras to Wimbledon (via GR or otherwise). As Mizter.T says, that might be quite a bit faster if you ticket allows it, without luggage and other mobility considerations. Victoria & Bakerloo to Waterloo might even be faster still. Depends or what time you allow yourself for the interchanges and to find a train at Waterloo. That's where the journey planner might have its limitations. Nah, all trains between Waterloo and Wimbledon stop at Vauxhall, so Vic line to Vauxhall and SWT onwards will always be quicker - KXSP to Vauxhall is 13 minutes, whilst KXSP to Waterloo is 14-16 minutes (via Oxford Circus and the easy change onto the Bakerloo). |
teacup
On 26 Feb, 14:39, wrote:
In article , (Mizter T) wrote: On Feb 25, 11:25 am, wrote: In article , (Walter Briscoe) wrote: [snip] Colin: I understand the DDA is a best efforts business. There was a minor loss of wheelchair access westbound with the introduction of the teacup - slower timetabled journeys. The serious limitation that Paddington is only accessible clockwise continues. Paddington's access is not on the Dec 2009 Step-free Tube guide. The tube map doesn't show one way access. My grouse, as a passenger without mobility impairment, is that there is no information at platform 4 on the first train to High Street Kensington. About a month ago, I arrived on 4 to find trains waiting at 2 and 3. A platform CSA (admittedly from an SST - peripatetic staff to deal with local shortages) had no information and did not volunteer to find any. Help points are not provided. I took the lazy decision which turned out to be sub-optimal. ;) The lack of information at Edgware Road also sounds like a serious deterioration too. I don't think I've ever met a helpful member of platform staff there either. Hold on, if it was never any good, how can it be a serious deterioration. I demand rhetoric with at least some logic underpinning it ;-) Colin: I believe my eastbound Circle line train had come via High Street Kensington and, so, arrived on the advertised platform. A decision to allow it to continue eastbound was taken to minimised customer delay. I think it a pity that LU publishes so little on the web about disruption. Wouldn't help many people on the move. They need it on the platforms! All: I am afraid I failed to note the URL for reliability statistics, which was recently given in utl. Aggregation of Circle and Hammersmith & City may reflect operational reality, but provides a poor measurement for customers. I recall the aggregation achieving about 90% before the service revision, where all other lines achieve 95%+. 93% would be good! I'm not mobility-impaired either but I do sometimes have luggage and other impedimenta. Luckily the granddaughter gets older and more able to walk herself over the footbridge as time goes by. And they say the new service is an improvement! Edgware Road sounds worse than ever, especially for information. *Why* can they still not show which is the first train for High St in this day and age? Because the signalling system isn't from this day and age. Just because Edgware Road might be a bit messy that doesn't invalidate the notion that the service has improved. Well, maybe it does to you. It does to the quite large proportion of Circle /H&C/WImbleware pax who want to "turn the top left corner". To me, the idea that the Circle line might actually work means I might start to acknowledge its existence. The old PIS at Edgware Road was immensely better with indicators on all platforms of the next trains from all platforms. When they "improved" things (and removed some historic baggage like the ability to show Verney Junction as a destination) they made things a lot worse, so it can't just be the signalling. Why didn't they at least do something more that new fixed signs to improve the passenger information systems there before messing with the Circle? They are positively misleading at times of disruption. The Earl's Court PIS is not even from my late father's age but it's better than at Edgware Road with more complexity in some respects (but not reversing trains, I concede). Do the indicators on the Wimble-related parts of the District yet show any next trains at all before they are actually in sight? I don't recall them ever doing so. |
teacup
In message
, at 03:46:57 on Fri, 26 Feb 2010, Mizter T remarked: Or are you saying there's a 5 minute gap between trains to HSK, which alternate between Wimbleware and Circle? Yep. If I was taking that route, then unless I knew the Wimbleware service was disrupted, I'd probably just stay put at Edgware Road until a direct train turned up. (Disregarding luggage considerations, Vic line to Vauxhall and then SWT to Wimbledon is the choice route I'd think - plenty of steps at Vauxhall for all the staircase fans out there!) Long way to the Victoria Line from the front of St Pancras :( -- Roland Perry |
teacup
In message
, Mizter T writes If I was taking that route, then unless I knew the Wimbleware service was disrupted, I'd probably just stay put at Edgware Road until a direct train turned up. I can see the attraction of changing elsewhere, though. Edgware Road is one of the coldest stations I've ever waited on! -- Paul Terry |
teacup
In message
, MIG writes Do the indicators on the Wimble-related parts of the District yet show any next trains at all before they are actually in sight? The live departure boards for Kensington High Street generally show an astonishing mish-mash. Just looked now and in the anti-clockwise direction I see: 1. Circle and Hammersmith & City (1 min) 2. Unknown (4 mins) - likely to be a Wimbleware, but it ought to know if its only 4 minutes away. 3. Circle Line Inner Rail (yep!) (10 mins) Ex-Wimbledon trains are recognised in the clockwise direction, though. As I recall, there is not always a direct correlation between the information on the web and that displayed on the platform, although I've always assumed (perhaps wrongly) that the information comes from the same source. -- Paul Terry |
teacup
Mizter T wrote
On Feb 26, 2:39 pm, wrote: Same one - St Pancras to Wimbledon (via GR or otherwise). As Mizter.T says, that might be quite a bit faster if you ticket allows it, without luggage and other mobility considerations. Victoria & Bakerloo to Waterloo might even be faster still. Depends or what time you allow yourself for the interchanges and to find a train at Waterloo. That's where the journey planner might have its limitations. Nah, all trains between Waterloo and Wimbledon stop at Vauxhall, so Vic line to Vauxhall and SWT onwards will always be quicker - KXSP to Vauxhall is 13 minutes, whilst KXSP to Waterloo is 14-16 minutes (via Oxford Circus and the easy change onto the Bakerloo). "next train to Wimbledon" at W'loo is a level stroll along the concourse - do all trains from Vauxhall to Wimbledon leave from the same platform pair ? If they don't you presumably hope the PIS is accurate. -- Mike D |
teacup
|
teacup
|
teacup
wrote in message ... In article , (Mizter T) wrote: On Feb 26, 2:39 pm, wrote: As Mizter.T says, that might be quite a bit faster if you ticket allows it, without luggage and other mobility considerations. Victoria & Bakerloo to Waterloo might even be faster still. Depends or what time you allow yourself for the interchanges and to find a train at Waterloo. That's where the journey planner might have its limitations. Nah, all trains between Waterloo and Wimbledon stop at Vauxhall, so Vic line to Vauxhall and SWT onwards will always be quicker - KXSP to Vauxhall is 13 minutes, whilst KXSP to Waterloo is 14-16 minutes (via Oxford Circus and the easy change onto the Bakerloo). Fair enough. I thought some SWT trains to Wimbledon were first stop Clapham Junction. Wrong line for me. This is relatively new. The Guildford trains used to miss out Vauxhall. There even used to be some that were Wimbledon first stop tim |
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:46 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk