Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Billy, I appreciate the time you've taken in replying to my post. And there
is no way I can comment on DipTac requirements, neither do I have any knowledge on the effectiveness of Revenue Inspectors and Roving supervision. A comparison with the French bus system which as you probably know is also cashless, is not possible as the network is nowhere near as extensive as ours. All I can comment on is 'In service' observations comparing Routemasters and the Citaro's which is what I will attempt to do here. First of all I think a lot of work has been done to increase both the number and reliability of off-bus ticketing machines. They seem to be located at every stop and at major stops there are more than one of them. From limited observation the Revenue Inspection seems to be most effective when a group of Inspectors accompanied by police officers 'swoop' on a bus stopping it until all passengers tickets are checked. And I have to say some Inspectors do not help themselves in their heavy handed "I am God" approach. One of my passengers came downstairs and told me that if the Inspector spoke like that to him again he would 'clobber him one'..... the passenger concerned had a valid ticket. I agree that a well conducted routemaster is better than a one person operated low floor double decker, but a Citaro Artic is better than a routemaster by virtue of it being single decked and having 3 large entrance/exits. Its dwell time at stops when at or near full capacity is better than a double decked vehicle be it routemaster or lowfloor bus. I now operate a National Express service into London every day and am very impressed by how little time a Citaro spends at stops. On the other hand I know how lazy some bus conductors can be, the tactic seems to be delaying the right away signal so the end up late before their break (thereby gaining an overtime payment) and as a result of late running reduced mileage will be operated on the second half of the duty. Also I cannot stress the amount of stress Routemasters cause when Tourists use them in places like Oxford Street. I have seen many fall off as they attempt to get on/off inbetween stops. -- Remove "0" from from daveb07890 to reply "Billy" wrote in message ... Yes David,but only if they are operating under the Cashless 3 Door Boarding system. My point is that if the Citaro is operated on the same system as a Routemaster,ie:cash Fares collected then the "Advantages" tend to evaporate. The problem with TfL`s introduction of Cashless Operation is that it has NOT been accompanied by the very necessary increase in Revenue Inspection and Roving Supervision. Rob Wooley`s previous post re planned increases in Rev Pro resources confirms how wrong TfL have got this one. Once the Revenue Collection system is compromised in the Travelling Public`s eye it then becomes far more difficult to re-impose the required degree of compliance. On my two most recent visits to Londres I witnessed intending pax being waved through on both an RV 1 and on a 527 because thay proffessed to having some form of difficulty with the Off Bus ticketing machines. Now it is not these individual pax concerned that TfL need be concerned about but the many other pax already on the buses concerned who were a receptive audience indeed to a short play about Free Travel...... And while I am about it Bob Wooley (Who admits to working for TfL.....Well somebody`s gotta do it ?) is only partially correct in Town Crying the TfL line on "Accessibility" where the Routemaster is concerned. Its a matter of opinion really as to whether a Considerately Conducted Routemaster is any worse than a modern One Person Operated Low Floor Double Decker for MOST people up to and including those classed as "Moderately" disabled. I am aware of some discussions in which many ambulatory but infirm folks remain resolutely in favour of the Routemaster TPO especially in its refurbished guise with DipTAC Stanchions and Brighter Interior lighting..... I am not an Anorak in this matter,as I am well aware of areas where the Routemaster does fall short of modern practice BUT the Standard of service capabable of being performed by the Refurbished vehicles remains on or above par with even the most modern LFDD designs. I remain unconvinced by attractive PR packaged "Spin" which attempts to sell us bottles of coloured smoke and I feel that Routemaster operation utilising the Latest Spec Refurbished vehicles is well within the capabilities of a well managed and inventive Customer-Centred operation.....????? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Converted D-78s | London Transport | |||
Maps of the Olympic cycling route and marathon route | London Transport | |||
Bus Route 186 Grahame Park Re-Route?? | London Transport | |||
Central line to be converted to AC? | London Transport | |||
Route 73 to go DD and Route 29 to go Bendi??? | London Transport |