| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
 |
|
Menu
| London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
| London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#2
April 19th 10, 12:18 PM
posted to uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
2009 stock **** poor interior design
On 19 Apr, 09:31, wrote:
I got to ride on a 2009 stock train on the victoria line recently. Was it designed by complete morons or were they partial morons who had help from the London School of ****wittery? The doors are the external type so the walls could be quite thin allowing more space as they don't have to provide space for the doors to fit in. So can someone explain why the walls are the thickest I've ever seen on a tube train? Must be 5 or 6 inches easily. And not satisfied with wasting almost a foot of space already they then mount the seats 2 inches from the walls. So instead of having the seats flush against a thin wall allowing a nice wide isle with maximum space it actually looks like theres a bit less space in the seating area than in a 67 stock. Can LU and its train builders ever get anything right? B2003 I think they are quite ugly at the front end. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Why isn't the 2009 stock walk through like the S stock? | London Transport | |||
| LUL New Stock design | London Transport | |||
| 2009 stock | London Transport | |||
| Looking for tube train interior plan | London Transport | |||
| Interior of Tube / Trains | London Transport | |||
Threaded Mode
