On 24/05/2010 12:41, Neil Williams wrote:
On 24 May, 13:36, wrote:

Is it just my screen, or is the whole map invisible apart from the
closed bits?

It's a very light shade of grey - could do with being made slightly
darker IMO.

Actually, the bulk of the map could be made normal colours, while the
trouble bits flash on and off, although that would not work for the
printed version which is posted at stations.

On May 24, 1:25*pm, Basil Jet wrote:

On 24/05/2010 12:41, Neil Williams wrote:

On 24 May, 13:36, *wrote:

Is it just my screen, or is the whole map invisible apart from the
closed bits?

It's a very light shade of grey - could do with being made slightly
darker IMO.

Actually, the bulk of the map could be made normal colours, while the
trouble bits flash on and off, although that would not work for the
printed version which is posted at stations.

Excellent - just like the web circa 1997!

Re the posters - that's a nit unambitious - what's electronic ink for
if not this?

On 24/05/2010 13:37, Mister T wrote:

On May 24, 1:25 pm, Basil wrote:

On 24/05/2010 12:41, Neil Williams wrote:

On 24 May, 13:36, wrote:

Is it just my screen, or is the whole map invisible apart from the
closed bits?

It's a very light shade of grey - could do with being made slightly
darker IMO.

Actually, the bulk of the map could be made normal colours, while the
trouble bits flash on and off, although that would not work for the
printed version which is posted at stations.

Excellent - just like the web circa 1997!

Re the posters - that's a nit unambitious - what's electronic ink for
if not this?

It's for black and white things, AFAIK.