Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27/05/2010 11:30, Mizter T wrote:
On May 27, 9:43 am, wrote: On Wed, 26 May 2010 14:36:03 -0700 (PDT), Mizter T wrote: On May 26, 4:59 pm, wrote: Mr. Benn wrote: "Mizter wrote: [snip] Of course he is - and he's completely right - if everyone just concentrated on looking at the road in front of them, and stopped getting distracted by that which is behind them, then all would be well. It's none of anyone's business what goes on behind them - we don't have eyes in the back of our head for a reason. Thanks for your advice. I'll completely remove the rear view mirror in my car as it doesn't serve any useful purpose. It was useful for the furry dice though. I constantly scan ALL of my mirrors at very regular intervals. To not do so, would be foolish and not very sensible driving. I try and anticipate and know what everything is doing around me, especially if a **** is driving too close to my rear bumper. This tells me to leave a bigger gap in front of me, just in case the car in front pulls up suddenly or a kiddie runs out into the road. There's then less chance of the **** behind me, rearending me. Constantly checking your rear view mirror IS common sense. You sound just like my driving instructor did. Boring. If your driving instructor was boring, he/she was probably a good driver. Boring means not taking risks. It means being consistent and predictable. It means not getting into sticky situations (as you foresaw a potential problem and avoided it) and keeping within your limits. Boring. No wonder it takes so long to get anywhere with people like you on the roads. You gotta push the limits, man. Fraid it doesn't work like that. Try going at different speeds on a known journey in traffic and see how your arrival times vary. Then try the same journey but stopping all the time - e.g. for petrol etc. You'll soon see what makes the real difference - not speed but time spent not moving. -- John Wright Use your imagination Marvin! Life's bad enough as it is - why invent any more of it. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 27 May 2010 13:19:01 +0100, john wright
wrote: On 27/05/2010 11:30, Mizter T wrote: Boring. No wonder it takes so long to get anywhere with people like you on the roads. You gotta push the limits, man. Fraid it doesn't work like that. Try going at different speeds on a known journey in traffic and see how your arrival times vary. Then try the same journey but stopping all the time - e.g. for petrol etc. You'll soon see what makes the real difference - not speed but time spent not moving. Whooooosh ... ! |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27/05/2010 15:05, Bruce wrote:
On Thu, 27 May 2010 13:19:01 +0100, john wrote: On 27/05/2010 11:30, Mizter T wrote: Boring. No wonder it takes so long to get anywhere with people like you on the roads. You gotta push the limits, man. Fraid it doesn't work like that. Try going at different speeds on a known journey in traffic and see how your arrival times vary. Then try the same journey but stopping all the time - e.g. for petrol etc. You'll soon see what makes the real difference - not speed but time spent not moving. Whooooosh ... ! You may say that... but having been overtaken no less than three times by the same police car (hence recognizable) in the space of ten miles on a dual carriageway, then ending up right behind him on the same off-ramp, I became convinced that speed (from say 45-75) matters little in overall journey time, it only makes seconds of difference. Hence no need to push the limits. I'm sure Jenson Button might well agree. -- John Wright Use your imagination Marvin! Life's bad enough as it is - why invent any more of it. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 27 May 2010 15:28:20 +0100, john wright
wrote: On 27/05/2010 15:05, Bruce wrote: On Thu, 27 May 2010 13:19:01 +0100, john wrote: On 27/05/2010 11:30, Mizter T wrote: Boring. No wonder it takes so long to get anywhere with people like you on the roads. You gotta push the limits, man. Fraid it doesn't work like that. Try going at different speeds on a known journey in traffic and see how your arrival times vary. Then try the same journey but stopping all the time - e.g. for petrol etc. You'll soon see what makes the real difference - not speed but time spent not moving. Whooooosh ... ! You may say that... but having been overtaken no less than three times by the same police car (hence recognizable) in the space of ten miles on a dual carriageway, then ending up right behind him on the same off-ramp, I became convinced that speed (from say 45-75) matters little in overall journey time, it only makes seconds of difference. Hence no need to push the limits. I'm sure Jenson Button might well agree. Whoosh again! Don't you know what it means? I mean whoosh. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27/05/2010 19:00, Bruce wrote:
On Thu, 27 May 2010 15:28:20 +0100, john wrote: On 27/05/2010 15:05, Bruce wrote: On Thu, 27 May 2010 13:19:01 +0100, john wrote: On 27/05/2010 11:30, Mizter T wrote: Boring. No wonder it takes so long to get anywhere with people like you on the roads. You gotta push the limits, man. Fraid it doesn't work like that. Try going at different speeds on a known journey in traffic and see how your arrival times vary. Then try the same journey but stopping all the time - e.g. for petrol etc. You'll soon see what makes the real difference - not speed but time spent not moving. Whooooosh ... ! You may say that... but having been overtaken no less than three times by the same police car (hence recognizable) in the space of ten miles on a dual carriageway, then ending up right behind him on the same off-ramp, I became convinced that speed (from say 45-75) matters little in overall journey time, it only makes seconds of difference. Hence no need to push the limits. I'm sure Jenson Button might well agree. Whoosh again! Don't you know what it means? I mean whoosh. It's generally taken to mean you don't understand what's been posted. i.e. its gone right over your head. -- John Wright Use your imagination Marvin! Life's bad enough as it is - why invent any more of it. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 28 May 2010 18:56:56 +0100, john wright
wrote: On 27/05/2010 19:00, Bruce wrote: On Thu, 27 May 2010 15:28:20 +0100, john wrote: On 27/05/2010 15:05, Bruce wrote: On Thu, 27 May 2010 13:19:01 +0100, john wrote: On 27/05/2010 11:30, Mizter T wrote: Boring. No wonder it takes so long to get anywhere with people like you on the roads. You gotta push the limits, man. Fraid it doesn't work like that. Try going at different speeds on a known journey in traffic and see how your arrival times vary. Then try the same journey but stopping all the time - e.g. for petrol etc. You'll soon see what makes the real difference - not speed but time spent not moving. Whooooosh ... ! You may say that... but having been overtaken no less than three times by the same police car (hence recognizable) in the space of ten miles on a dual carriageway, then ending up right behind him on the same off-ramp, I became convinced that speed (from say 45-75) matters little in overall journey time, it only makes seconds of difference. Hence no need to push the limits. I'm sure Jenson Button might well agree. Whoosh again! Don't you know what it means? I mean whoosh. It's generally taken to mean you don't understand what's been posted. i.e. its gone right over your head. In particular, that you haven't understood the humour, or the irony, or that you just didn't get it at all. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On May 27, 1:19*pm, john wright wrote: On 27/05/2010 11:30, Mizter T wrote: On May 27, 9:43 am, *wrote: On Wed, 26 May 2010 14:36:03 -0700 (PDT), Mizter T wrote: [snip] You sound just like my driving instructor did. Boring. If your driving instructor was boring, he/she was probably a good driver. Boring means not taking risks. It means being consistent and predictable. It means not getting into sticky situations (as you foresaw a potential problem and avoided it) and keeping within your limits. Boring. No wonder it takes so long to get anywhere with people like you on the roads. You gotta push the limits, man. Fraid it doesn't work like that. Try going at different speeds on a known journey in traffic and see how your arrival times vary. Then try the same journey but stopping all the time - e.g. for petrol etc. You'll soon see what makes the real difference - not speed but time spent not moving. I stop for nothing. Unless absolutely, unavoidably necessary. Gotta live in the fast lane man - and *every* lane is the fast lane. No wonder we're all going nowhere. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27 May, 15:46, Mizter T wrote:
On May 27, 1:19*pm, john wright wrote: On 27/05/2010 11:30, Mizter T wrote: On May 27, 9:43 am, *wrote: On Wed, 26 May 2010 14:36:03 -0700 (PDT), Mizter T wrote: [snip] You sound just like my driving instructor did. Boring. If your driving instructor was boring, he/she was probably a good driver. Boring means not taking risks. It means being consistent and predictable. It means not getting into sticky situations (as you foresaw a potential problem and avoided it) and keeping within your limits. Boring. No wonder it takes so long to get anywhere with people like you on the roads. You gotta push the limits, man. Fraid it doesn't work like that. Try going at different speeds on a known journey in traffic and see how your arrival times vary. Then try the same journey but stopping all the time - e.g. for petrol etc. You'll soon see what makes the real difference - not speed but time spent not moving. I stop for nothing. Unless absolutely, unavoidably necessary. Gotta live in the fast lane man - and *every* lane is the fast lane. No wonder we're all going nowhere. In that case I suggest that you'd still be better off using your mirror: to look out for things that might crash into you. Anyone in front of you should use their own mirror and get out of your way. No point you looking at them, because you ain't gonna stop. And you can check your appearance all the time of course. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On May 27, 4:33*pm, MIG wrote: On 27 May, 15:46, Mizter T wrote: [snip] I stop for nothing. Unless absolutely, unavoidably necessary. Gotta live in the fast lane man - and *every* lane is the fast lane. No wonder we're all going nowhere. In that case I suggest that you'd still be better off using your mirror: to look out for things that might crash into you. *Anyone in front of you should use their own mirror and get out of your way. No point you looking at them, because you ain't gonna stop. And you can check your appearance all the time of course. Nah, mirrors are unnatural. And nothing's gonna catch me up. Though you do have a point - there's not a lot of point in paying *too* much attention to the road ahead either - over-concentration is as bad as no concentration. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bus Lanes: Proof Of What We All Knew | London Transport | |||
Couple banned for life from shopping centre and branded 'terrorists' - for taking photos of their grandchildren | London Transport | |||
Taking the PIS | London Transport | |||
Taking a dog on the underground | London Transport | |||
What are bus lanes worth? | London Transport |