Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message op.vg09em1lby8eno@sheepdog, at 21:19:24 on Fri, 6 Aug 2010,
Colin McKenzie remarked: 22. Park Royal: Central, Piccadilly Anyone know what happened to this one? A few years ago it seemed to be going ahead. The office development that was to fund it has stalled. Theoretically it's still a requirement if all the offices get built, but London Underground were never keen, and the condition is likely to be dropped if housing is built instead of offices. A pity, and I still hope it goes ahead. It's easy to work out that passengers from further out on Piccadilly or Central lines, going to a zone 1 or 2 destination on the other line, benefit from changing at Park Royal. So does LU, as it reduces number of stations passed and number of interchanges made in zone 1, where tube capacity is most strained. And they're more likely to get a seat. But this sort of lateral thinking seems to be beyond London Underground. It's also possible that people living "further out on the Piccadilly" would use it as a short cut to/from the West End, thereby overloading the Central. -- Roland Perry |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Gatwick Fastway (Fantasy?) | London Transport | |||
Fantasy bus routes | London Transport | |||
Visiting London & Newcastle: any suggested stations | London Transport | |||
Problems with Travelcard issued at NR stations | London Transport | |||
New Abbreviation for two LU stations. | London Transport |