I totally agree! on TalkRadio this morning there was a debate about this new
toll road and most callers supported it! I thought you bunch of morons! Only
a small amount of the road tax we pay gets spent on the roads, the rest is
stolen and wasted by other government departments. There lies the ****ing
problem! why on earth anybody thinks we should have to pay an extra tax to
use a new road that should ALREADY be funded by our road tax I do not know.

"tarquinlinbin" wrote in message
...
http://www.m6toll.co.uk/

The new Midlands M6 toll road has opened.

Inevitably the great British gullible public will happliy pour onto it
and pay their fees (twice).

I say dont use it and prove to government what a folly this is. Sure
there will be pain if you continue to use the "public" M6 but its a no
pain no gain situation.

Who gave the Government and the private company the right to cut
another swathe through the English countryside?. I am a freeman of
this country and no one asked me,did they ask you?.

The current toll fees are loss leaders becuase the Government and the
private comany know that this is very much an experiment,an experimnet
to see if the British mugs really will bite.

As soon as they feel its safe to do so,they;ll crank the tolls up and
wind down on investment/maintenance of the "public" M6.

You the motorist already pay enough in tax,dont be so foolish as to
let them fleece you again!.

If you do then you will be setting a precedent for univeraal tolling
AND road tax AND fuel tax

The British are their own worst enemy,it takes an age to rouse them to
action and by the time they do,its way too late.

Diversity Isn't A Codeword For Anti-White wrote:
I totally agree! on TalkRadio this morning there was a debate about
this new toll road and most callers supported it! I thought you bunch
of morons! Only a small amount of the road tax we pay gets spent on
the roads, the rest is stolen and wasted by other government
departments. There lies the ****ing problem! why on earth anybody
thinks we should have to pay an extra tax to use a new road that
should ALREADY be funded by our road tax I do not know.


I suppose you advocate everyone ****ting in the garden because the local
water authority isn't spending enough on the sewers?
--
MrBitsy

"MrBitsy" wrote in message
...
Diversity Isn't A Codeword For Anti-White wrote:
I totally agree! on TalkRadio this morning there was a debate about
this new toll road and most callers supported it! I thought you bunch
of morons! Only a small amount of the road tax we pay gets spent on
the roads, the rest is stolen and wasted by other government
departments. There lies the ****ing problem! why on earth anybody
thinks we should have to pay an extra tax to use a new road that
should ALREADY be funded by our road tax I do not know.


I suppose you advocate everyone ****ting in the garden because the local
water authority isn't spending enough on the sewers?
--
MrBitsy

Why whats wrong with recycling our waste into fertiliser instead of
letting some company make a profit from cleaning up our ****?, The Roads and
the water are paid for by direct taxation, we should not be paying a pennt
for toll roads and water is the fuel of life companies should notbe allowed
to profit from it.

On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 13:52:28 -0000, "MrBitsy"
wrote:

Diversity Isn't A Codeword For Anti-White wrote:
I totally agree! on TalkRadio this morning there was a debate about
this new toll road and most callers supported it! I thought you bunch
of morons! Only a small amount of the road tax we pay gets spent on
the roads, the rest is stolen and wasted by other government
departments. There lies the ****ing problem! why on earth anybody
thinks we should have to pay an extra tax to use a new road that
should ALREADY be funded by our road tax I do not know.


I suppose you advocate everyone ****ting in the garden because the local
water authority isn't spending enough on the sewers?
And would you advocate widespread proliferation of road building,both
private and public simply becuase the Government refuses to construct
and facilitate integrated public transport systems but instead merely
pays lip service because they know that as long as cars are on the
road,they have a universal cash cow to milk.

"tarquinlinbin" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 13:52:28 -0000, "MrBitsy"
wrote:

Diversity Isn't A Codeword For Anti-White wrote:
I totally agree! on TalkRadio this morning there was a debate about
this new toll road and most callers supported it! I thought you bunch
of morons! Only a small amount of the road tax we pay gets spent on
the roads, the rest is stolen and wasted by other government
departments. There lies the ****ing problem! why on earth anybody
thinks we should have to pay an extra tax to use a new road that
should ALREADY be funded by our road tax I do not know.


I suppose you advocate everyone ****ting in the garden because the local
water authority isn't spending enough on the sewers?
And would you advocate widespread proliferation of road building,both
private and public simply becuase the Government refuses to construct
and facilitate integrated public transport systems but instead merely
pays lip service because they know that as long as cars are on the
road,they have a universal cash cow to milk.

If the govt didn't steal so much of our road tax money and local councils
weren't so obsessed with purposely causing congestion we'd have perfect
roads and wouldn't need to build any new ones.

On Tue, 09 Dec 2003 15:23:54 GMT, Diversity Isn't A Codeword For
Anti-White wrote:

"tarquinlinbin" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 13:52:28 -0000, "MrBitsy"
wrote:

Diversity Isn't A Codeword For Anti-White wrote:
I totally agree! on TalkRadio this morning there was a debate about
this new toll road and most callers supported it! I thought you bunch
of morons! Only a small amount of the road tax we pay gets spent on
the roads, the rest is stolen and wasted by other government
departments. There lies the ****ing problem! why on earth anybody
thinks we should have to pay an extra tax to use a new road that
should ALREADY be funded by our road tax I do not know.


I suppose you advocate everyone ****ting in the garden because the local
water authority isn't spending enough on the sewers?
And would you advocate widespread proliferation of road building,both
private and public simply becuase the Government refuses to construct
and facilitate integrated public transport systems but instead merely
pays lip service because they know that as long as cars are on the
road,they have a universal cash cow to milk.

If the govt didn't steal so much of our road tax money and local councils
weren't so obsessed with purposely causing congestion we'd have perfect
roads and wouldn't need to build any new ones.

Ah, tunnel vision is a wonderful means to avoid the realities of
life.....

"Wanderer" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 09 Dec 2003 15:23:54 GMT, Diversity Isn't A Codeword For
Anti-White wrote:

"tarquinlinbin" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 13:52:28 -0000, "MrBitsy"
wrote:

Diversity Isn't A Codeword For Anti-White wrote:
I totally agree! on TalkRadio this morning there was a debate about
this new toll road and most callers supported it! I thought you bunch
of morons! Only a small amount of the road tax we pay gets spent on
the roads, the rest is stolen and wasted by other government
departments. There lies the ****ing problem! why on earth anybody
thinks we should have to pay an extra tax to use a new road that
should ALREADY be funded by our road tax I do not know.


I suppose you advocate everyone ****ting in the garden because the
local
water authority isn't spending enough on the sewers?
And would you advocate widespread proliferation of road building,both
private and public simply becuase the Government refuses to construct
and facilitate integrated public transport systems but instead merely
pays lip service because they know that as long as cars are on the
road,they have a universal cash cow to milk.

If the govt didn't steal so much of our road tax money and local
councils
weren't so obsessed with purposely causing congestion we'd have perfect
roads and wouldn't need to build any new ones.

Ah, tunnel vision is a wonderful means to avoid the realities of
life.....

what country are you living in whereby local councils do not purposely
create congestion, because they certainly do in London. And are you also
denying the govt doesn't steal a large percentage of road tax that it uses
on non-road issues? tunnel vision and non-reality, looks like you suffer
both, you maroon.

On Tue, 09 Dec 2003 15:25:46 +0000, Wanderer wrote:


If the govt didn't steal so much of our road tax money and local councils
weren't so obsessed with purposely causing congestion we'd have perfect
roads and wouldn't need to build any new ones.

Ah, tunnel vision is a wonderful means to avoid the realities of
life.....

Is there a toll on tunnel vision? ;-)

On Tue, 09 Dec 2003 15:23:54 GMT, "Diversity Isn't A Codeword For
Anti-White" wrote:



If the govt didn't steal so much of our road tax money and local councils
weren't so obsessed with purposely causing congestion we'd have perfect
roads and wouldn't need to build any new ones.

I agree with you but it isnt in their interests to invest in public
transport. Government needs cars on the road to keep the tax rolling
in,local authorities are happy to leave the cars on the road and not
invest in public transport because they have more important matters to
finance such as Bengali transaltors,outreach workers and fairness
co-ordinators. I kid you not,the fairness co-ordinators job recently
appeared in the Manchester Evening News and was sought by Bolton Metro
Council.

Twould probably be far better to trawl through the records of the Toll
Collecting company and to amuse oneself trying to spot the
families/friends/representatives of senior political and administrative
figures who are on the shareholders register......!
At least thats the way it works over here in the Republic...!