London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21   Report Post  
Old January 7th 11, 01:36 PM posted to uk.railway,misc.transport.urban-transit,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jun 2010
Posts: 252
Default Jubilee Line ATO

On Jan 7, 2:14*pm, Mike Bristow wrote:
In article ,
* * * * Graeme Wall wrote:

On 07/01/2011 10:37, Tim Fenton wrote:


"Graeme Wall" wrote in message
...


Still, worth taking a Chance(ry Lane) on.


I wouldn't Bank on it working.


It's what they Wanstead.


Well that's the Mile End of the conversation.


That's not the Queensway of speaking.

What about St Pauls?

  #22   Report Post  
Old January 7th 11, 01:49 PM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.railway
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,920
Default Jubilee Line ATO

On Fri, 7 Jan 2011 14:22:41 +0000
Mike Bristow wrote:
["Followup-To:" header set to uk.transport.london.]
In article ,
d wrote:
So fill us in on how removing a set of points increases operational
flexibility then.


It doesn't.

But the cost of that operational flexiblity is increased disruption
(points fail more often than plain track) and increased cost (points
need more maintenance then plain track).


If they're clipped out of use most of the time they can't fail short of a
rail breaking.

B2003


  #23   Report Post  
Old January 7th 11, 02:12 PM posted to uk.transport.london,misc.transport.urban-transit,uk.railway
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jun 2010
Posts: 252
Default Jubilee Line ATO

On Jan 7, 2:49*pm, wrote:
On Fri, 7 Jan 2011 14:22:41 +0000

Mike Bristow wrote:
["Followup-To:" header set to uk.transport.london.]
In article ,
* wrote:
So fill us in on how removing a set of points increases operational
flexibility then.


It doesn't.


But the cost of that operational flexiblity is increased disruption
(points fail more often than plain track) and increased cost (points
need more maintenance then plain track).


If they're clipped out of use most of the time they can't fail short of a
rail breaking.

Moreover, when they are needed, the returns in goodwill and
convenience to passengers is enormous. If one of the two lines is not
available on Monday morning after a weekend possession the ability to
still move at least some passengers to work is great asset.
  #24   Report Post  
Old January 7th 11, 02:48 PM posted to uk.transport.london,misc.transport.urban-transit,uk.railway
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Dec 2010
Posts: 5
Default Jubilee Line ATO

I got to have a quick chat with a Jubilee line driver at Stratford
yesterday night about the TBTC ATO system, I was curious to know how
the trains implement a stop at Stratford Staff Halt if there is a
request from staff at Market Depot.

The driver told me that the line controller has to be informed and a
request stop will be implemented in to the system once the train
departs West Ham, once the train arrives at the Staff Halt the driver
opens the cab door and that stops the train from restarting, once the
cab door is closed the train can continue.
  #25   Report Post  
Old January 7th 11, 03:31 PM posted to uk.railway,misc.transport.urban-transit,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,715
Default Jubilee Line ATO

On 07/01/2011 16:17, Tim Fenton wrote:

"Graeme Wall" wrote in message
...

Still, worth taking a Chance(ry Lane) on.

I wouldn't Bank on it working.

It's what they Wanstead.


Well that's the Mile End of the conversation.


It's that Epping Graeme Wall, making a complete Hainault of himself.


I see you East Acton that assumption.

--
Graeme Wall
This account not read, substitute trains for rail.
Railway Miscellany at www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail
Photo galleries at http://graeme-wall.fotopic.net


  #26   Report Post  
Old January 7th 11, 05:05 PM posted to uk.railway,misc.transport.urban-transit,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jun 2009
Posts: 175
Default Jubilee Line ATO

Tim Fenton wrote:

"Chris Tolley" (ukonline really) wrote in message
...

Still, worth taking a Chance(ry Lane) on.

I wouldn't Bank on it working.


Not sure I can Stan-more of this.


Central Line access error ;-)


Thread title...
--
http://gallery120232.fotopic.net/p9633104.html
(56 072 hauling an oil train (surprise surprise!) into Helsby in 1985)
  #27   Report Post  
Old January 7th 11, 05:47 PM posted to uk.railway,misc.transport.urban-transit,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jun 2007
Posts: 19
Default Jubilee Line ATO

On Jan 7, 4:31*pm, Graeme Wall wrote:
On 07/01/2011 16:17, Tim Fenton wrote:



"Graeme Wall" wrote in message
...


Still, worth taking a Chance(ry Lane) on.


I wouldn't Bank on it working.


It's what they Wanstead.


Well that's the Mile End of the conversation.


It's that Epping Graeme Wall, making a complete Hainault of himself.


I see you East Acton that assumption.

--
Graeme Wall
This account not read, substitute trains for rail.
Railway Miscellany at www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail
Photo galleries at http://graeme-wall.fotopic.net


I hope this doesn't go on much lOngar

Patrick
  #28   Report Post  
Old January 7th 11, 05:58 PM posted to uk.railway,misc.transport.urban-transit,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: May 2005
Posts: 6,077
Default Jubilee Line ATO


On Jan 7, 6:47*pm, D1039 wrote:

On Jan 7, 4:31*pm, Graeme Wall wrote:

On 07/01/2011 16:17, Tim Fenton wrote:
[snip]
It's that Epping Graeme Wall, making a complete Hainault of himself.


I see you East Acton that assumption.


I hope this doesn't go on much lOngar


Yes, time to call a (Nort)holt to it all now.
  #29   Report Post  
Old January 7th 11, 06:39 PM posted to uk.railway,misc.transport.urban-transit,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jun 2010
Posts: 252
Default Jubilee Line ATO

On Jan 7, 10:47*am, D1039 wrote:
On Jan 7, 4:31*pm, Graeme Wall wrote:





On 07/01/2011 16:17, Tim Fenton wrote:


"Graeme Wall" wrote in message
...


Still, worth taking a Chance(ry Lane) on.


I wouldn't Bank on it working.


It's what they Wanstead.


Well that's the Mile End of the conversation.


It's that Epping Graeme Wall, making a complete Hainault of himself.


I see you East Acton that assumption.


--
Graeme Wall
This account not read, substitute trains for rail.
Railway Miscellany at www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail
Photo galleries at http://graeme-wall.fotopic.net


I hope this doesn't go on much lOngar

Can ruISlIP in another one?
  #30   Report Post  
Old January 7th 11, 07:28 PM posted to uk.railway,misc.transport.urban-transit,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 529
Default Jubilee Line ATO

On Jan 7, 7:21*pm, "Tim Fenton" wrote:

Not sure I can Stan-more of this.


There's still Dollis Hill, mind ...



Is that Doris More nee Hill who married Stan More ?

--
Nick


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Jubilee Line ATO Mizter T London Transport 0 January 4th 11 09:17 PM
Jubilee ATO Joe[_2_] London Transport 0 February 25th 09 10:06 AM
How can you have a signal failure on an ATO system? Boltar London Transport 20 September 5th 07 05:48 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017