Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 15:42:03 on
Tue, 15 Feb 2011, Mizter T remarked: why there's no mobile coverage within the tube? I tried to call a friend but unsuccessfully. I think the Laws of Physics have something to do with it. It's the law of "trying to get someone else to pay for the installation". Do you mean LU trying to get someone other than themselves to pay? If so, damn right - LU shouldn't pay for such provision. The reverse wasn't it? LU paying to have the infrastructure fitted so they could talk to train drivers, and the public also using it being a bonus. Previous discussions have all revolved around the installation of BTSs at stations only, and not in the running tunnels which would just add an enormous extra layer of complexity and cost for little return (I'm thinking of the deep-level tube tunnels in particular here). They've managed it in the HEx tunnels. -- Roland Perry |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
My Thoughts on Recent LU Coverage | London Transport | |||
My Thoughts on Recent LU Coverage | London Transport | |||
Patchy coverage for Oyster topups in South London | London Transport | |||
Mobile phone coverage on the Waterloo and City line | London Transport | |||
TV coverage of SidewaysBike | London Transport |