London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #61   Report Post  
Old May 12th 11, 07:36 AM posted to uk.transport.london,misc.transport.urban-transit,uk.railway
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jun 2009
Posts: 175
Default Croxley Rail Link "Exhibition" dates

Basil Jet wrote:

On 2011\05\12 02:30, Free Lunch wrote:
On Wed, 11 May 2011 08:44:59 +0100, Chris
(ukonline really) wrote in misc.transport.urban-transit:

Free Lunch wrote:

On Tue, 10 May 2011 23:06:08 +0100, Chris
(ukonline really) wrote in misc.transport.urban-transit:

1506 wrote:

If I told my neighbrs in Washoe County, Nevada that I grew up in
Buckinghamshire they would not relate that to a county, "Shire" is
obscure in North America.

It briefly comes to the fore every four years at the start of the
Presidential race.

It may be smaller than some US counties, but no one thinks of the
(clearly misnamed) New Hampshire as a county.

Not suggesting they do, just suggesting that "shire", as relating to a
place is not obscure.

Why is it "clearly misnamed", BTW?


Because it's not just a county, it's a state.

At least it isn't New Yorkshire.


But it is New England!


Quite. In context, it's a sub-unit of New England.

Looked at like that, US counties are not equivalent to UK counties, but
rather to UK hundreds and wapentakes.

--
..sig down for maintenance

  #62   Report Post  
Old May 12th 11, 08:07 AM posted to uk.transport.london,misc.transport.urban-transit,uk.railway
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Dec 2010
Posts: 138
Default Croxley Rail Link "Exhibition" dates

On 11/05/2011 23:09, Bruce wrote:
Tom wrote:
On Tue, 10 May 2011, Free Lunch wrote:
It may be smaller than some US counties, but no one thinks of the
(clearly misnamed) New Hampshire as a county.


Seems alright to me. The real problem round there is that the city of New
York isn't in the state of New Yorkshire.



"York, York, so good they named it twice ..."

No, it definitely doesn't sound as good. ;-)


It was named after the Duke of York, not Yorkshire,

--
Myth, after all, is what we believe naturally. History is what we must
painfully learn and struggle to remember. -Albert Goldman
  #63   Report Post  
Old May 12th 11, 08:40 PM posted to uk.transport.london,misc.transport.urban-transit,uk.railway
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,188
Default Croxley Rail Link "Exhibition" dates

On Wed, 11 May 2011, Bruce wrote:

Tom Anderson wrote:
On Tue, 10 May 2011, Free Lunch wrote:
It may be smaller than some US counties, but no one thinks of the
(clearly misnamed) New Hampshire as a county.


Seems alright to me. The real problem round there is that the city of New
York isn't in the state of New Yorkshire.


"York, York, so good they named it twice ..."

No, it definitely doesn't sound as good. ;-)


It does have five boroughs, though!

tom

--
Meten is Weten.
  #64   Report Post  
Old May 12th 11, 08:45 PM posted to uk.transport.london,misc.transport.urban-transit,uk.railway
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,188
Default Croxley Rail Link "Exhibition" dates

On Thu, 12 May 2011, Chris Tolley wrote:

Basil Jet wrote:

On 2011\05\12 02:30, Free Lunch wrote:
On Wed, 11 May 2011 08:44:59 +0100, Chris
(ukonline really) wrote in misc.transport.urban-transit:

Free Lunch wrote:

On Tue, 10 May 2011 23:06:08 +0100, Chris
(ukonline really) wrote in misc.transport.urban-transit:

1506 wrote:

If I told my neighbrs in Washoe County, Nevada that I grew up in
Buckinghamshire they would not relate that to a county, "Shire" is
obscure in North America.

It briefly comes to the fore every four years at the start of the
Presidential race.

It may be smaller than some US counties, but no one thinks of the
(clearly misnamed) New Hampshire as a county.

Not suggesting they do, just suggesting that "shire", as relating to a
place is not obscure.

Why is it "clearly misnamed", BTW?

Because it's not just a county, it's a state.

At least it isn't New Yorkshire.


But it is New England!


Quite. In context, it's a sub-unit of New England.


Well, except that New York state isn't considered a part of New England.
The northeast, but not New England.

Looked at like that, US counties are not equivalent to UK counties, but
rather to UK hundreds and wapentakes.


Oh, definitely. Any American would tell you that.

tom

--
Meten is Weten.
  #65   Report Post  
Old May 12th 11, 11:24 PM posted to uk.transport.london,misc.transport.urban-transit,uk.railway
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jun 2009
Posts: 175
Default Croxley Rail Link "Exhibition" dates

Tom Anderson wrote:

On Thu, 12 May 2011, Chris Tolley wrote:
Looked at like that, US counties are not equivalent to UK counties, but
rather to UK hundreds and wapentakes.


Oh, definitely. Any American would tell you that.


;-)

--
..sig down for maintenance


  #66   Report Post  
Old May 13th 11, 07:24 AM posted to uk.transport.london,misc.transport.urban-transit,uk.railway
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Sep 2007
Posts: 112
Default Croxley Rail Link "Exhibition" dates

On 11/05/2011 11:51, Nick Leverton wrote:
They left from Plymouth on about the third attempt, having had to turn
back. Their first attempt did leave the UK from Southampton, as Graeme
recalled, the settlers having originally come from Nottinghamshire via
the Netherlands (source: Dodgypedia).


Their first attempt to leave the country was to depart from Lincolnshire
for the Netherlands, but they were arrested and imprisoned in Boston
(Lincolnshire).

You can visit the cells where they are believed to have been imprisoned
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_Guildhall

There is a Pilgrim Fathers memorial near Boston
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pilgrim_Fathers_Memorial

--
Jeremy Double {real address, include nospam}
Rail and transport photos at
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jmdoubl...7603834894248/


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Croxley Rail Link "Exhibition" dates Clive D. W. Feather[_2_] London Transport 2 May 22nd 11 06:30 PM
Croxley Rail Link "Exhibition" dates Jamie Thompson London Transport 15 May 10th 11 02:49 PM
Croxley Rail Link Petition burkey London Transport 42 April 19th 07 07:57 PM
CROXLEY RAIL LINK - POSITION UPDATE - February 2007 burkey London Transport 4 March 6th 07 01:06 PM
Future is bleak for Croxley Rail Link JWBA68 London Transport 8 January 28th 04 12:53 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:23 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017