Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Anger at Oyster cards 'rip-off' as millions hit for not 'touching out'
Roland Perry wrote
at 18:30:08 on Mon, 27 Jun 2011, Michael R Dolbear me@ remarked: The US embassy is relying on the statement made by Ken Livingston that the congestion charge was a tax - he was so excited that he let mouth run away when the tax was first introduced Interesting. Has anyone produced a reasoned argument about the difference between a tax and a toll ? Tolls are rarely charged on routes you *have* to use, there's normally a "long way round". Which doesn't exist for the US Embassy, being inside the zone. So it's a lot more like car tax, than say the Dartford Toll. Wouldn't they get a 90% residents' discount anyway? I googled [tolls taxes distinction diplomat extdf] And got a US law review discussion about a 2007 New York congestion charge proposal - Tax or user fee. http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/j...3.1/Powell.pdf Lots of footnotes, though the proposition that classification as tax or not is that of the local legal system rather than autonomous to the Vienna Conventions is ill supported. But the argument that fire brigade services can be charged for even if only available, not used and that the reduction in congestion is a similar general benefit seems a fair one. -- Mike D |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Oyster: still an unreliable rip-off | London Transport | |||
Oyster - a 60 million a year rip-off | London Transport | |||
Another Oyster Rip-off | London Transport | |||
Out of station NR interchanges: to touch out or not? | London Transport | |||
Touching in/out at Stratford | London Transport |