Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 28, 2:54*pm, "Mizter T" wrote:
"Bruce" wrote: Posted without comment: Wandsworth reveals Waterloo-Heathrow direct rail plans Wandsworth Council has today unveiled plans for a new direct rail service from south London to Heathrow airport. [...] A map of the proposed route is available on the council's website: http://preview.tinyurl.com/6xjzzoa I'll leave it to others to question (/ demolish!) this particular proposal (/ bit of blue sky thinking), but with regards to the underlying issue - the lack of rail connectivity from Heathrow to the south really is a significant missing piece in terms of public transport access to the airport. I'm sure it'd result in fewer people getting to and from the airport by car/cab, with the knock-on benefits in terms of a reduction in road traffic that'd bring (indeed I'm sure there's some Airtrack related study or two to this end out there somewhere... but I haven't looked for it, let alone read it!). I guess if this proposal went ahead, once the tunnels are there, there's the option for other routes to link in. Would the plan give a through route up to the Heathrow express tunnels? That'd give extra options for joined up transport links. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Stuart Moore" wrote in message
On Oct 28, 2:54 pm, "Mizter T" wrote: "Bruce" wrote: Posted without comment: Wandsworth reveals Waterloo-Heathrow direct rail plans Wandsworth Council has today unveiled plans for a new direct rail service from south London to Heathrow airport. [...] A map of the proposed route is available on the council's website: http://preview.tinyurl.com/6xjzzoa I'll leave it to others to question (/ demolish!) this particular proposal (/ bit of blue sky thinking), but with regards to the underlying issue - the lack of rail connectivity from Heathrow to the south really is a significant missing piece in terms of public transport access to the airport. I'm sure it'd result in fewer people getting to and from the airport by car/cab, with the knock-on benefits in terms of a reduction in road traffic that'd bring (indeed I'm sure there's some Airtrack related study or two to this end out there somewhere... but I haven't looked for it, let alone read it!). I guess if this proposal went ahead, once the tunnels are there, there's the option for other routes to link in. Would the plan give a through route up to the Heathrow express tunnels? That'd give extra options for joined up transport links. No, I don't think so. The two sets of lines and platforms are separate, and parallel to each other (the Airtrack tunnels are south of the HEx tunnels). Even if there is a connection, it's not meant to be used by service trains. In any case, the services will be more reliable if kept separate. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Recliner" wrote in message
... No, I don't think so. The two sets of lines and platforms are separate, and parallel to each other (the Airtrack tunnels are south of the HEx tunnels). Even if there is a connection, it's not meant to be used by service trains. In any case, the services will be more reliable if kept separate. Despite the existing layout, the published Airtrack proposals always anticipated HEx running through to Staines as well - it is exactly why Staines station was to get an additional west facing bay platform... Paul S |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Recliner" wrote in message
... "Stuart Moore" wrote Would the plan give a through route up to the Heathrow express tunnels? That'd give extra options for joined up transport links. No, I don't think so. The two sets of lines and platforms are separate, and parallel to each other (the Airtrack tunnels are south of the HEx tunnels). Even if there is a connection, it's not meant to be used by service trains. In any case, the services will be more reliable if kept separate. The main disadvantage of Airtrack (either original or this) is that it only gives through trains to T5, with a change there needed to access the Central Area, and a further change to get to T4 (might as well get the bus from Feltham). While there would be a slight reduction in reliability, connectivity would be improved by linking Airtrack with HEx/HConn/Crossrail. The other disadvantage of Airtrack-Lite is that journey times from Waterloo/Clapham Junction would be very slow, and further changes would be needed to get to the Reading line, or to Woking (for Main Line connections) or Guildford. Peter |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 28, 4:12*pm, "Recliner" wrote:
"Stuart Moore" wrote in message On Oct 28, 2:54 pm, "Mizter T" wrote: "Bruce" wrote: Posted without comment: Wandsworth reveals Waterloo-Heathrow direct rail plans Wandsworth Council has today unveiled plans for a new direct rail service from south London to Heathrow airport. [...] A map of the proposed route is available on the council's website: http://preview.tinyurl.com/6xjzzoa I'll leave it to others to question (/ demolish!) this particular proposal (/ bit of blue sky thinking), but with regards to the underlying issue - the lack of rail connectivity from Heathrow to the south really is a significant missing piece in terms of public transport access to the airport. I'm sure it'd result in fewer people getting to and from the airport by car/cab, with the knock-on benefits in terms of a reduction in road traffic that'd bring (indeed I'm sure there's some Airtrack related study or two to this end out there somewhere... but I haven't looked for it, let alone read it!). I guess if this proposal went ahead, once the tunnels are there, there's the option for other routes to link in. Would the plan give a through route up to the Heathrow express tunnels? That'd give extra options for joined up transport links. No, I don't think so. The two sets of lines and platforms are separate, and parallel to each other (the Airtrack tunnels are south of the HEx tunnels). Even if there is a connection, it's not meant to be used by service trains. In any case, the services will be more reliable if kept separate. I can't help thinking that providing through lines now is relatively cheap as part of the main project, whereas adding them later when they weren't originally planned is expensive. If it enabled another connection that avoided central London, surely that's worth having. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I wonder how the ticket prices would be reckoned. Feltham and Heathrow
are in Zone 6, but Staines and Ashford (which the train passes through are outside Zone 6. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 30/10/2011 19:05, JohnLon wrote:
I wonder how the ticket prices would be reckoned. Feltham and Heathrow are in Zone 6, but Staines and Ashford (which the train passes through are outside Zone 6. It goes to an airport, so there will have to be a premium fare outside the normal local system, ideally with the impression you can use a normal ticket but something in the small print saying you can't, and the instructions should be in English only and well hidden. And ideally the station should have a slightly different name to the airport. Something random like a suitcase surcharge would add to the fun. -- Arthur Figgis Surrey, UK |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 30, 7:28*pm, Arthur Figgis wrote:
On 30/10/2011 19:05, JohnLon wrote: I wonder how the ticket prices would be reckoned. Feltham and Heathrow are in Zone 6, but Staines and Ashford (which the train passes through are outside Zone 6. It goes to an airport, so there will have to be a premium fare outside the normal local system, Why? There isn't in Manchester. -- Stephen |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 30, 11:11*pm, Stephen Farrow wrote:
On Oct 30, 7:28*pm, Arthur Figgis wrote: On 30/10/2011 19:05, JohnLon wrote: I wonder how the ticket prices would be reckoned. Feltham and Heathrow are in Zone 6, but Staines and Ashford (which the train passes through are outside Zone 6. It goes to an airport, so there will have to be a premium fare outside the normal local system, Why? There isn't in Manchester. -- Stephen The proposed service is not a special high speed, but normal suburban train running into Heathrow. The Picadilly line runs to Heathrow Zone 6 with no premium. They could just put Staines and Ashford into Zone 6. John |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"JohnLon" wrote in message
... I wonder how the ticket prices would be reckoned. Feltham and Heathrow are in Zone 6, but Staines and Ashford (which the train passes through are outside Zone 6. No mystery, they'd be in either a special zone where National Rail fares apply; as per Watford Jn, and 'zone G' on c2c routes outside zone 6; or if the fares were usable zones 7,8 or 9. If it ever happens the precedent will already be in use anyway, as the greater Anglia franchise is extending PAYG outside the zones to Shenfield and Hertford East next year some time... Paul S |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Heathrow Airtrack update | London Transport | |||
Airtrack and Heathrow | London Transport | |||
16/01/2008 - London Lite | London Transport | |||
Airtrack to beat Crossrail to Heathrow? | London Transport | |||
Snow-machines proposed to cool Tube | London Transport |