Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2011\11\14 23:50, Martin Rich wrote:
"The Gardener" wrote in message ... It would be great if the Northern City could be extended south to Bank, or further. Sadly, that's very unlikely as it's not that deep a line at Moorgate, and there are building foundations in the way. In any case, without platform lengthening, it probably would not be justified. If I remember rightly, it's not just any building foundations, but the the Bank of England's vaults, that would thwart this particular extension. I think you're thinking of the Waterloo & City Line. The Great Northern is far enough away from Bank that you could avoid any particular building if you were happy to demolish others. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Basil Jet wrote: On 2011\11\14 23:50, Martin Rich wrote: "The Gardener" wrote in message ... It would be great if the Northern City could be extended south to Bank, or further. Sadly, that's very unlikely as it's not that deep a line at Moorgate, and there are building foundations in the way. In any case, without platform lengthening, it probably would not be justified. If I remember rightly, it's not just any building foundations, but the the Bank of England's vaults, that would thwart this particular extension. I think you're thinking of the Waterloo & City Line. The Great Northern is far enough away from Bank that you could avoid any particular building if you were happy to demolish others. The GN&C has, or at least had, a safeguarded extension route to Lothbury, and in 1912 there was a parliamentary bill submitted (by the Metropolitan) to extend the GN&C to there and link to the W&C, so the vaults can't be an insuperable obstacle for either line. The link was rejected because of property objections, true, but if it wasn't feasible then I don't think the Met would have wasted money on a Bill. Nick -- Serendipity: http://www.leverton.org/blosxom (last update 29th March 2010) "The Internet, a sort of ersatz counterfeit of real life" -- Janet Street-Porter, BBC2, 19th March 1996 |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 15, 11:14*am, Nick Leverton wrote:
In article , Basil Jet wrote: On 2011\11\14 23:50, Martin Rich wrote: "The Gardener" wrote in message .... It would be great if the Northern City could be extended south to Bank, or further. Sadly, that's very unlikely as it's not that deep a line at Moorgate, and there are building foundations in the way. In any case, without platform lengthening, it probably would not be justified. If I remember rightly, it's not just any building foundations, but the the Bank of England's vaults, that would thwart this particular extension. I think you're thinking of the Waterloo & City Line. The Great Northern is far enough away from Bank that you could avoid any particular building if you were happy to demolish others. The GN&C has, or at least had, a safeguarded extension route to Lothbury, and in 1912 there was a parliamentary bill submitted (by the Metropolitan) to extend the GN&C to there and link to the W&C, so the vaults can't be an insuperable obstacle for either line. *The link was rejected because of property objections, true, but if it wasn't feasible then I don't think the Met would have wasted money on a Bill. Just reaching Bank would be great. If the line could continue to Cannon Street and London Bridge, all the better. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Nick Leverton" wrote in message ... In article , Basil Jet wrote: I think you're thinking of the Waterloo & City Line. The Great Northern is far enough away from Bank that you could avoid any particular building if you were happy to demolish others. The GN&C has, or at least had, a safeguarded extension route to Lothbury, and in 1912 there was a parliamentary bill submitted (by the Metropolitan) to extend the GN&C to there and link to the W&C, so the vaults can't be an insuperable obstacle for either line. The link was rejected because of property objections, true, but if it wasn't feasible then I don't think the Met would have wasted money on a Bill. It's possible that the extension was only possible until the Bank of England was rebuilt in the 1930s. Their page at http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/educa...buildings8.htm suggested that this rebuilding included a lot of construction below ground, though apparently offices rather than vaults. It's also possible that the safeguarded route ended at Lothbury rather than Bank Station to avoid going under the Bank of England, but that would be hard to reconcile with the intention of linking up with the Waterloo and City. In any case John, aka Basil Jet, is probably right that I misremembered and it's the W & C for which the bank's vaults would preclude any extension Martin |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Exit 4 Bank Station | London Transport | |||
Bank station: DLR - Northern interchange? | London Transport | |||
Bank Station reconstruction | London Transport | |||
Bank Station - W&C | London Transport | |||
Marylebone Enlargement | London Transport |