Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Neil Williams" wrote The difference is the infrastructure, not the trains. The Bakerloo "shared" bit is +660 outer, 0 inner, so works for both. The Tube proper including the Met is +440 outer, -220 inner, so no good for third rail EMUs. Or something like that. When the Croxley Link is built the section through Watford High Street will have to have an operative 4th rail reinstated (for the Met trains) but at 0V (bonded to the running rails for the LO trains. Should there be any intention to run LO trains on to the existing Met (e.g. a Watford Junction to Chesham or Amersham service) the Met infrastructure would have to be altered in the same way as Queens Park to Harrow & W, Putney Bridge to Wimbledon, and Gunnersbury - Richmond. It would be easier to use LU trains. IMHO there is a case for the Croxley Link also to be used by trains from Chesham or Amersham. But I doubt that there's a business case for procuring new trains for this, and the likely traffic won't justify 8-car trains. Perhaps a few of the D78 trains could be arranged as 4-car sets and modified as necessary for future Met signalling. Certainly a better place to use them than Harrogate. Peter |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ELL shut today "due to Network Rail engineering work" - hmm... | London Transport | |||
Decision on Croxley Rail Link due 'in next two weeks' | London Transport | |||
CROXLEY RAIL LINK decision due this year | London Transport | |||
PPP Arbiter announces draft decision | London Transport | |||
'Weekend Tubes': decision on later start and finish times | London Transport |