Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Charles Ellson" wrote in message ... On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 22:36:54 -0000, "Paul Scott" wrote: Not an insurmountable issue though, as seen on the Bakerloo and District, and the new S stock has apparently been built to allow use on the raised third rail supply voltage that NR are about to provide around London... Compatibility is not inevitably a reversable function. The shared sections all involve some re-arrangement of the power supply and/or signalling systems. You can e.g. send LU and NR electric stock into Richmond but neither can take the wrong direction at Gunnersbury as one requires power between the 3rd and 4th rails and the other requires the power supply between the 3rd rail and one running rail. Normal LU signalling is not intended to have traction currents flowing in the running rails. So exactly as I said it is not an 'insurmountable issue'. They build the NEW infrastructure to allow for third rail EMUs as well as LU stock, and alter a section of the existing infrastructure to match. It is all being completely resignalled anyway by 2018... Paul S |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ELL shut today "due to Network Rail engineering work" - hmm... | London Transport | |||
Decision on Croxley Rail Link due 'in next two weeks' | London Transport | |||
CROXLEY RAIL LINK decision due this year | London Transport | |||
PPP Arbiter announces draft decision | London Transport | |||
'Weekend Tubes': decision on later start and finish times | London Transport |