London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old January 24th 12, 09:15 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london,misc.transport.rail.americas
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Mar 2008
Posts: 61
Default CharlieCards v.v. Oyster (and Octopus?)

writes:
In other words,
smart-card-based POP essentially needs "optional" faregates (which
pass-holders can bypass).


A 'tap' reader is a heck of a lot simpler than a turnstile.


The fare-card-reading part can be the same though, when using a
smart-card based system. After all, it's really doing exactly the
same thing in both cases: making a note on the card that the passenger
has entered at that station, and maybe debiting some "initial" amount
from any amount stored on the card.

Faster, too.


You've never used a modern Japanese faregate I guess... :]

[there's no "turning bar" like NYC-style turnstiles, in fact they
normally don't present any barrier, they just stay open while people
walk through -- but there's an extremely fast gate that shuts if
someone tries to go through without paying (it also opens very quickly
as soon as they've paid).]

The reason why I say the two would end up being structured very
similarly for a POP system where a large percentage of the passengers
aren't using passes is that you've got to (1) have enough "tap
readers" to handle large influxes of passengers, and (2) you want to
structure the station so that these large influxes of passengers can
use them in a short period of time (3) you want to ensure that
passengers can easily find them (even if they ran into the station at
the last minute to catch the train). In other words, you've got to
think about the flow of passengers who want to tap; simply plonking
down a few machines "here and there" on the platform doesn't scale
very well.

If electronic tickets are used, then the fare inspectors will need
portable readers. Actually, if going to POP, a paper based system
like the River Line would do the job and I don't see any advantage to
an electronic ticket. To me, electronic tickets are only justified
with turnstiles.


The problem with a "paper based system" is that it forces passengers to
stop and buy tickets, which is annoying and can be a huge bottleneck
(worse that a faregate by far).

For passenger convenience (which is very important I think), smart
cards completely thrash paper tickets.

-Miles

--
(\(\
(^.^)
(")")
*This is the cute bunny virus, please copy this into your sig so it can spread.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Oyster and CPCs to Gatwick Airport and intermediate stations Matthew Dickinson London Transport 2 January 12th 16 01:29 PM
Oyster and CPCs to Gatwick Airport and intermediate stations Matthew Dickinson London Transport 6 December 21st 15 11:46 PM
Zones 1, 2 and 3 or just 2 and 3 and PAYG martin j London Transport 5 October 20th 11 08:13 PM
Jewellery can be purchased that will have holiday themes, likeChristmas that depict images of snowmen and snowflakes, and this type offashion jewellery can also be purchased with Valentine's Day themes, as wellas themes and gems that will go with you [email protected] London Transport 0 April 25th 08 11:06 PM
I've been to London for business meetings and told myself that I'd be back to see London for myself. (rather than flying one day and out the next) I've used the tube briefly and my questions a Stuart Teo London Transport 4 January 30th 04 03:57 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017