London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old February 25th 12, 08:44 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london,misc.transport.rail.americas
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Aug 2004
Posts: 172
Default cards, was E-ZPass, was CharlieCards v.v. Oyster (and Octopus?)

On 25-Feb-12 11:30, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
Roland Perry wrote:
at 16:40:17 on Sat, 25 Feb 2012, Adam H. Kerman remarked:
Really? There's no concept of pre-authorizing the transaction, then
charging the customer the approved charge in two separate steps, both
performed at the retail terminal?


No. I routinely spend amounts of the order of a thousand dollars at
retailers by Chip and PIN card, and it's a one-shot process.


If that's true, then I suspect your credit limit is stored on the card.

In a typical transaction in the US, the customer or cashier swipes the
card at the terminal (which one does it depends on the layout). Data is
exchanged with the credit card processor's server. Data sent back to
the merchant's terminal is the account credit limit (not disclosed to
the cashier unless there is a situation with a high-value purchase like
jewelry) and authorization code.


Really? I've never heard of card processors telling merchants what the
credit limit (or available credit, which is what I suspect you meant) on
a card is, just whether the authorization attempt succeeded.

Note that an authorization is for a particular amount of money, so there
is no _need_ for the merchant to know how much credit is available in
excess of that.

The authorization code is critical,
which is why merchants cooperate in pre-authorizing sales. If a merchant
submits a transaction that wasn't pre-authorized and the bill isn't paid,
the merchant's account is charged back.


That's not how it works. Authorization is confirmation from the card
issuers that a charge for the specified amount (or less) can be posted
successfully.

It has no effect on chargebacks; a customer can dispute posted charges
whether or not they were authorized first.

It also has nothing to do with whether the bill is paid, which is
entirely a matter between the card issuer and the customer.

During authorization, there is a temporary freeze put on the cardholder's
credit limit in some fixed block amount, such as rounding up to the next
$100. This block must exceed the actual purchase amount.


Perhaps your issuer does that, but every card I've had puts a "hold" on
the exact amount the merchant requested authorization for.

Some merchants, eg. restaurants and bars, will authorize more than the
total assuming you'll make additional purchases and/or add a tip, which
gets corrected when the final charge is posted. I've never seen any
other type of merchant do that.

Gas stations usually authorize for $1 and then (try to) post the full
amount. Technically this is risky for them, as the posting may be
denied if the card doesn't have enough credit available at the time, but
apparently the common risk is closed/over-limit cards.

S

--
Stephen Sprunk "God does not play dice." --Albert Einstein
CCIE #3723 "God is an inveterate gambler, and He throws the
K5SSS dice at every possible opportunity." --Stephen Hawking
  #2   Report Post  
Old February 25th 12, 10:34 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london,misc.transport.rail.americas
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jan 2012
Posts: 167
Default cards, was E-ZPass, was CharlieCards v.v. Oyster (and Octopus?)

Stephen Sprunk wrote:
On 25-Feb-12 11:30, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
Roland Perry wrote:
at 16:40:17 on Sat, 25 Feb 2012, Adam H. Kerman remarked:


Really? There's no concept of pre-authorizing the transaction, then
charging the customer the approved charge in two separate steps, both
performed at the retail terminal?


No. I routinely spend amounts of the order of a thousand dollars at
retailers by Chip and PIN card, and it's a one-shot process.


If that's true, then I suspect your credit limit is stored on the card.


In a typical transaction in the US, the customer or cashier swipes the
card at the terminal (which one does it depends on the layout). Data is
exchanged with the credit card processor's server. Data sent back to
the merchant's terminal is the account credit limit (not disclosed to
the cashier unless there is a situation with a high-value purchase like
jewelry) and authorization code.


Really? I've never heard of card processors telling merchants what the
credit limit (or available credit, which is what I suspect you meant) on
a card is, just whether the authorization attempt succeeded.


No, I don't mean available credit nor total credit, neither of which
are the merchant's business. I mean an amount frozen to be used for
that particular transaction, that isn't available for other transactions,
until cleared.

Note that an authorization is for a particular amount of money, so there
is no _need_ for the merchant to know how much credit is available in
excess of that.


The amount held for the transaction is somewhat higher than the amount
charged because it's rounded up.

The authorization code is critical, which is why merchants cooperate
in pre-authorizing sales. If a merchant submits a transaction that
wasn't pre-authorized and the bill isn't paid, the merchant's account
is charged back.


That's not how it works. Authorization is confirmation from the card
issuers that a charge for the specified amount (or less) can be posted
successfully.


I have no idea what distinction you are making, and neither do you.

It has no effect on chargebacks; a customer can dispute posted charges
whether or not they were authorized first.


I made no comment about customer disputes. If the bill isn't paid because
it's legitimate or because it's illegitimate (stolen card, identity theft),
the merchant's account is charged back.

It also has nothing to do with whether the bill is paid, which is
entirely a matter between the card issuer and the customer.


Bull****. If the transaction wasn't authorized, and the bill isn't
paid, the merchant is out the money. That's why they have the card
terminals to obtain authorization, duh, and they don't use the
impression machines to make old fashioned charge slips.

During authorization, there is a temporary freeze put on the cardholder's
credit limit in some fixed block amount, such as rounding up to the next
$100. This block must exceed the actual purchase amount.


Perhaps your issuer does that, but every card I've had puts a "hold" on
the exact amount the merchant requested authorization for.


Not between the time the authorization is requested and the transaction
ID number is issued, it's not, and sometimes, the higher amount doesn't
clear for a couple of days. It got to be a problem at gas stations.

Gas stations usually authorize for $1 and then (try to) post the full
amount.


Not true. The amount might be $75, depending on if it's Visa or MC.
Sometimes gas stations have signs up telling purchasers that if the tank
purchase exceeds that amount, the purchaser has to break up the purchase
into two transactions. The credit card clearing houses know when cards
are used at gas pumps for this reason.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Oyster and CPCs to Gatwick Airport and intermediate stations Matthew Dickinson London Transport 2 January 12th 16 01:29 PM
Oyster and CPCs to Gatwick Airport and intermediate stations Matthew Dickinson London Transport 6 December 21st 15 11:46 PM
Zones 1, 2 and 3 or just 2 and 3 and PAYG martin j London Transport 5 October 20th 11 08:13 PM
Jewellery can be purchased that will have holiday themes, likeChristmas that depict images of snowmen and snowflakes, and this type offashion jewellery can also be purchased with Valentine's Day themes, as wellas themes and gems that will go with you [email protected] London Transport 0 April 25th 08 11:06 PM
I've been to London for business meetings and told myself that I'd be back to see London for myself. (rather than flying one day and out the next) I've used the tube briefly and my questions a Stuart Teo London Transport 4 January 30th 04 03:57 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017