Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
card numbers, was cards, was E-ZPass, was CharlieCards v.v. Oyster (and Octopus?)
In message , at 14:39:53 on Fri, 2 Mar
2012, John Levine remarked: In all cases, the lasr number is a check digit, computed using a secret formula known only to people who know how to type "Luhn" into Google. When I was working in mail order we wanted to be able to checksum card numbers handwritten on orders, or taken over the phone. We knew there was a checksum, but the companies refused to tell us (this was decades before Google, naturally). So we pooled our company AMEX cards on the table, which of course had quite a lot of digits in common, and had cracked it in about five minutes. Then, as we suspected, the same algorithm worked for the rest. But to return to the original point of this exercise, to get free train travel, buy a $20 Visa gift card for cash at the supermarket, and use it on the train. (Do they even have gift cards in the UK? If so, make it a 20 quid gift card.) There are lots of gift cards, but to be honest I've never thought they might be numbered like credit cards. They are branded to particular stores or chains. And then there were pre-pay charge cards about five or six years ago, which think got scrapped because they were too easy for money launderers to move money internationally with. Their charges were a bit steep as well. Until you've bought $20 worth of tickets, it works normally, and the ticket price is deducted from your balance when the transaction clears. After that, the bank rejects the transaction, but if the guard's ticket machine doesn't validate in real time, by the time that happens you're long gone, and since the card is a bearer instrument, they have no way to know who to go after. Repeat indefinitely until the expiration date on the card. Knowing the BIN ranges of debit cards and gift cards doesn't help here, since many of them are entirely valid and the train company will get paid. The train companies already don't accept Solo and Electron[1], because they (the train companies) don't have online verification, so they'd just add those sorts of cards to that list. [1] Debit cards for accounts with no overdraft facilities and/or impoverished customers, like students, and under-18's. -- Roland Perry |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
card numbers, was cards, was E-ZPass, was CharlieCards v.v. Oyster (and Octopus?)
Roland Perry wrote:
There are lots of gift cards, but to be honest I've never thought they might be numbered like credit cards. They are branded to particular stores or chains. In the US, gift cards have evolved over the past few years. They used to be issued by the store in question and may or may not have had a proprietary account number embossed/recorded. A few years ago, the major card issuers became aware of the market and decided they wanted a peice of the float/lost card funds and started issuing gift cards on behalf of the retailers. Now days, they are essentially prepaid debit cards. Depending on the card, they can be restricted to a particular store, chain of stores, or used anywhere a credit card is accepted. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
card numbers, was cards, was E-ZPass, was CharlieCards v.v. Oyster (and Octopus?)
In message , at 08:31:52 on
Fri, 2 Mar 2012, Robert Neville remarked: There are lots of gift cards, but to be honest I've never thought they might be numbered like credit cards. They are branded to particular stores or chains. In the US, gift cards have evolved over the past few years. They used to be issued by the store in question and may or may not have had a proprietary account number embossed/recorded. A few years ago, the major card issuers became aware of the market and decided they wanted a peice of the float/lost card funds and started issuing gift cards on behalf of the retailers. Now days, they are essentially prepaid debit cards. Depending on the card, they can be restricted to a particular store, chain of stores, or used anywhere a credit card is accepted. I've just come back from ASDA, which is the UK's branch of Walmart. They have gift cards, but only mag stripe, and neither visibly numbered nor containing a chip-and-pin. The latter is going to raise the bar, for gift cards masquerading as credit/debit cards, in the UK. The literature said you could load up to £500 on them, and as far as I could see were only redeemable at ASDA (not including some high risk concessions). They will also give regular refunds on these gift cards, if you ask for it rather than cash. https://cards.asda.com/faqs I do worry about the "Monkey Bank" brand name, after all if you pay peanuts... -- Roland Perry |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
card numbers, was cards, was E-ZPass, was CharlieCards v.v. Oyster (and Octopus?)
They have gift cards, but only mag stripe, and neither visibly numbered
nor containing a chip-and-pin. The latter is going to raise the bar, for gift cards masquerading as credit/debit cards, in the UK. Perhaps you would enjoy a Travelex Cash Passport, a chip+pin reloadable prepaid card. They're denominated in EUR or GBP but sold only in the U.S. The advertising emphasizes the acceptance problems that non-chip cards can have in Europe. The card is "free" but the only way to load money into it is to exchange USD at a dreadful exchange rate. http://www.travelex.com/US/Products/Cash-Passport/ R's, John -- Regards, John Levine, , Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
card numbers, was cards, was E-ZPass, was CharlieCards v.v. Oyster (and Octopus?)
In message , at 19:35:20 on Fri, 2 Mar
2012, John Levine remarked: They have gift cards, but only mag stripe, and neither visibly numbered nor containing a chip-and-pin. The latter is going to raise the bar, for gift cards masquerading as credit/debit cards, in the UK. Perhaps you would enjoy a Travelex Cash Passport, a chip+pin reloadable prepaid card. They're denominated in EUR or GBP but sold only in the U.S. The advertising emphasizes the acceptance problems that non-chip cards can have in Europe. The card is "free" but the only way to load money into it is to exchange USD at a dreadful exchange rate. http://www.travelex.com/US/Products/Cash-Passport/ Travelex tried to palm one of those off when I asked for Australian dollars, but that entirely misses the point for Brits who already have C&P cards - when travelling abroad I need some *cash*, if an ATM's accessible I could use an existing card. -- Roland Perry |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
card numbers, was cards, was E-ZPass, was CharlieCards v.v. Oyster(and Octopus?)
On 02-Mar-12 09:09, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 14:39:53 on Fri, 2 Mar 2012, John Levine remarked: In all cases, the lasr number is a check digit, computed using a secret formula known only to people who know how to type "Luhn" into Google. When I was working in mail order we wanted to be able to checksum card numbers handwritten on orders, or taken over the phone. We knew there was a checksum, but the companies refused to tell us (this was decades before Google, naturally). So we pooled our company AMEX cards on the table, which of course had quite a lot of digits in common, and had cracked it in about five minutes. Then, as we suspected, the same algorithm worked for the rest. But to return to the original point of this exercise, to get free train travel, buy a $20 Visa gift card for cash at the supermarket, and use it on the train. (Do they even have gift cards in the UK? If so, make it a 20 quid gift card.) There are lots of gift cards, but to be honest I've never thought they might be numbered like credit cards. They are branded to particular stores or chains. Store-branded gift cards have been around for a long time; some have numbers in the 6 range, like a store-branded credit card, but most I've seen have a barcode (using some store-specific numbering system) rather than a magstripe. Gift cards are very, very popular in the US. Stores love them because they know only a small fraction get redeemed before they expire, and customers love them because it's simpler and faster than actually shopping before the numerous holidays that our crazy culture says we're obligated to give people gifts. And then there were pre-pay charge cards about five or six years ago, which think got scrapped because they were too easy for money launderers to move money internationally with. Their charges were a bit steep as well. Relatively recently, Visa and AmEx* have introduced gift cards with the usual logos, magstripe and embossed numbers as on any other US-issued card from those networks. They are purchased for face value just like a store-brand gift card. AFAIK, they are not refillable, which would make them distinct from prepaid cards. (* I've never noticed MC ones, but they may exist.) Until you've bought $20 worth of tickets, it works normally, and the ticket price is deducted from your balance when the transaction clears. After that, the bank rejects the transaction, but if the guard's ticket machine doesn't validate in real time, by the time that happens you're long gone, and since the card is a bearer instrument, they have no way to know who to go after. Repeat indefinitely until the expiration date on the card. Knowing the BIN ranges of debit cards and gift cards doesn't help here, since many of them are entirely valid and the train company will get paid. The train companies already don't accept Solo and Electron[1], because they (the train companies) don't have online verification, so they'd just add those sorts of cards to that list. [1] Debit cards for accounts with no overdraft facilities and/or impoverished customers, like students, and under-18's. The same problem could be had with an near-/over-limit credit card, whereas one of those evil debit cards could have plenty of funds available. It seems a rather arbitrary distinction. S -- Stephen Sprunk "God does not play dice." --Albert Einstein CCIE #3723 "God is an inveterate gambler, and He throws the K5SSS dice at every possible opportunity." --Stephen Hawking |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
card numbers, was cards, was E-ZPass, was CharlieCards v.v. Oyster (and Octopus?)
In message , at 15:14:16 on Fri, 2 Mar 2012,
Stephen Sprunk remarked: The train companies already don't accept Solo and Electron[1], because they (the train companies) don't have online verification, so they'd just add those sorts of cards to that list. [1] Debit cards for accounts with no overdraft facilities and/or impoverished customers, like students, and under-18's. The same problem could be had with an near-/over-limit credit card, whereas one of those evil debit cards could have plenty of funds available. It seems a rather arbitrary distinction. The difference is that someone with a credit card has been shown to be eligible for credit *at all*. All you are doing is allowing a slightly elastic limit. The debit cards are for people who don't qualify for credit, either because of their age or their history. -- Roland Perry |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
card numbers, was cards, was E-ZPass, was CharlieCards v.v. Oyster(and Octopus?)
On 03-Mar-12 02:45, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 15:14:16 on Fri, 2 Mar 2012, Stephen Sprunk remarked: The train companies already don't accept Solo and Electron[1], because they (the train companies) don't have online verification, so they'd just add those sorts of cards to that list. [1] Debit cards for accounts with no overdraft facilities and/or impoverished customers, like students, and under-18's. The same problem could be had with an near-/over-limit credit card, whereas one of those evil debit cards could have plenty of funds available. It seems a rather arbitrary distinction. The difference is that someone with a credit card has been shown to be eligible for credit *at all*. All you are doing is allowing a slightly elastic limit. The debit cards are for people who don't qualify for credit, either because of their age or their history. Pretty much everyone qualifies for a credit card, at least in the US. Those with poor credit scores get a low limit and high interest rate, but they can still get a card. If nothing else, they can get a "secured" credit card. (That type of card may be unique to the US.) IMHO, in most* cases using credit shows fiscal irresponsibility because the person is spending money they do not have. If anything, I would be more likely to trust a _debit_ card user. (* My personal rule is that one should never be paying for something after one has finished using it. So, credit only makes sense for things like education, housing, durable goods, etc. Not for train tickets, certainly.) Note that "credit" in the US generally means _revolving_ credit; if you are referring to "charge" cards that have to be paid in full every month, that is a different matter. However, charge cards are rare in the US; even AmEx, the best-known charge card brand, now offers revolving cards to profit from Americans' irresponsibility. S -- Stephen Sprunk "God does not play dice." --Albert Einstein CCIE #3723 "God is an inveterate gambler, and He throws the K5SSS dice at every possible opportunity." --Stephen Hawking |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
card numbers, was cards, was E-ZPass, was CharlieCards v.v. Oyster (and Octopus?)
In message , at 14:45:38 on Sat, 3 Mar 2012,
Stephen Sprunk remarked: Pretty much everyone qualifies for a credit card, at least in the US. Those with poor credit scores get a low limit and high interest rate, but they can still get a card. If nothing else, they can get a "secured" credit card. (That type of card may be unique to the US.) Last time I looked into this, about half the UK's adult population is regarded as "not credit worthy". Although it's easier to get store credit, mail order catalogue credit, and "Hire purchase credit" for durable items, than a credit card for general use. IMHO, in most* cases using credit shows fiscal irresponsibility because the person is spending money they do not have. If anything, I would be more likely to trust a _debit_ card user. The problem with the (former) holders of Solo/Electron cards is that often they are minor and therefore pursuing debts against them is tricky. So they need a bank account and debit card which cannot go overdrawn. In the UK we don't usually have parents co-signing in such circumstance, other than perhaps for the rental of a property for a student. Then there are the folks whose bank won't allow them an overdraft because they haven't been shown to be fiscally responsible. As a result, there's an aura of literally "poor man's card" hanging over all debit cards. A lot of credit card holders use them in effect as charge cards, as a substitute for the "monthly credit" that the middle classes used to get from tradesmen. -- Roland Perry |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
card numbers, was cards, was E-ZPass, was CharlieCards v.v. Oyster(and Octopus?)
On 04/03/2012 08:51, Roland Perry wrote:
The problem with the (former) holders of Solo/Electron cards is that often they are minor and therefore pursuing debts against them is tricky. So they need a bank account and debit card which cannot go overdrawn. In the UK we don't usually have parents co-signing in such circumstance, other than perhaps for the rental of a property for a student. Then there are the folks whose bank won't allow them an overdraft because they haven't been shown to be fiscally responsible. As a result, there's an aura of literally "poor man's card" hanging over all debit cards. Eh? This might be true for Solo/Electron cards (which never seemed to be accepted by everyone), though I don't have any experience with one. I do have a couple of debit cards, replacing cheque guarantee and ATM cards on my current accounts (US:checking accounts)[1], but I've never noticed any form of poor man's aura about them. [1] As do tens of millions of other UK current account holders. A lot of credit card holders use them in effect as charge cards, as a substitute for the "monthly credit" that the middle classes used to get from tradesmen. Before my time but, given the interest rates on credit cards, how else would you use them if you are in a position to clear the debt on them each month? (And, although this might be an old-fashioned view, if you're not in a position to clear the debt you ought not run it up in the first place.) Mind you, having your grocer deliver your shopping is back in fashion. -- Graham Nye news(a)thenyes.org.uk |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|