Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote I'm pretty sure Britain used exchange names as the US did. When did Britain go to all number calling? Outside London (and other large cities) exchange names lasted into the 1980s. However, the letters of the exchange name were not directly used in dialling. Long distance calls used the national dialling code for the exchange, but local calls to a nearby exchange could use a local code instead, and calls to the same exchange still do not need the exchange code, only the number. Peter |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 3 Apr 2012 09:06:59 +0100, "Peter Masson"
wrote: wrote I'm pretty sure Britain used exchange names as the US did. When did Britain go to all number calling? Outside London (and other large cities) exchange names lasted into the 1980s. .... but only dropped for public usage. The name actually generally defined a group of exchanges**, originally those within a city or large town but later including those satellite exchages in "linked numbering" schemes which provided a uniform 6 (sometimes 5)-digit numbering arrangement for all of area using main exchange name so that local codes were disguised within the numbering or made unneccesary once exchages were able to translate numbers. ** Using Watford (15 miles NW of London) as an example - there were three exchanges in a 5-digit numbering scheme, each exchange being identified (and calls routed by) the first digit 2, 3 or 4. Smaller surrounding exchanges gradually lost their own identities as the Watford area progressed to 6-digit numbers and modernisation of exchange equipment let the exchanges rather than the users worry about how a call reached another exchange in the group. However, the letters of the exchange name were not directly used in dialling. Long distance calls used the national dialling code for the exchange, but local calls to a nearby exchange could use a local code instead, and calls to the same exchange still do not need the exchange code, only the number. Not calls to the same exchange but calls within the same numbering group which can still consist of several exchanges/concentrators; local codes were abolished some years ago which in some cases means that local calls require the full national number to be dialled (but are still charged as local). The "director" areas continue to require the full 7 or 8 digit number (local exchange code+local number) on local calls except for the special case of 020 0xxx xxx numbers which require the full national number to be dialled). |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|