Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Double deck Crossrail
"Aidan Stanger" schreef in bericht ... Chetoph wrote: As Crossrail is in all likelihood going to be a regional link, as opposed to an intercity one, are there any reasons why it could not run double deck trains similar to those is Paris? London Regional Metro (the private sector consortium with plans to build a more commercially viable version of Crossrail) includes the provision for double decker trains in its plans. Your question implies that double deck trains are better for regional services than intercity ones, but the reverse is the case because of the extra time the trains would take to load and unload. I met with some people from LRM and asked why they thought it was worth the extra expense of bigger tunnels when double deck trains would require longer station dwell times. I was told that the tunnels required for double deck trains aren't much bigger than for normal trains, and aren't much costlier (the running tunnels are a relatively small component of the cost anyway). Furthermore CTRL completion would make some large TBMs available. There were no plans for double decker trains initially, but they thought it made sense to keep the option open to introduce them if Crossrail gets too crowded after several decades. Meanwhile, the bigger tunnels would at least provide an aerodynamic advantage. Here in the Netherlands, we have doubledecker trains for almost 20 years now. I guess that the train services in the higly urbanised and densily populated western part of the country ("Randstad Holland") is somewhat comparable with Greater London. Increased loading/unloading times are not considered to be a problem here. Most doubledeckers have wide doors that allow three people to pass through them at the same time. However, those carriages have been tested on the München S-Bahn and the Germans considered the flow of people to slow. Maybe because Bavarians are much wider than Dutchman... The trains have been build to fit in the usual Continental profile. The comfort doesn't suffer too much, especially in the newest trains that are used in Intercity services. I guess using doubledecker trains is way cheaper than making trains (and platforms) longer of running more trains. greetings, hgrm -- Aidan Stanger |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Modern double deck trams | London Transport | |||
On the Top Deck | London Transport | |||
Mobiles double up as bus tickets | London Transport | |||
Double Artic Trolleybus. | London Transport | |||
Safety of Bendy buses vs double deckers | London Transport |