Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roland Perry wrote in message ...
In message , Ian Johnston writes Or that the "resource" they are missing is floodlighting? A very, very, very, very poor substitute for sunlight. What to the police do north of the Arctic Circle? Hibernate? Make the best of a bad job? Seems to me that there is a weeny difference between waiting a few hours for enough daylight to do a good job and waiting several weeks or months. if you came home at midnight and saw water coming froma blocked gutter, would you immediately shin up a ladder - ather than wit till the morning - because that's how they do things in Reykjavik? Ian |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Ian
Johnston writes if you came home at midnight and saw water coming froma blocked gutter, would you immediately shin up a ladder - ather than wit till the morning - because that's how they do things in Reykjavik? I've been called out at 2am to inspect leaking gutters at the workplace I was responsible for; if that helps. -- Roland Perry |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roland Perry wrote in message ...
In message , Ian Johnston writes if you came home at midnight and saw water coming froma blocked gutter, would you immediately shin up a ladder - ather than wit till the morning - because that's how they do things in Reykjavik? I've been called out at 2am to inspect leaking gutters at the workplace I was responsible for; if that helps. And you repaired them there and then, did you, leaving no part of the job until the morning? Ian |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Ian
Johnston writes I've been called out at 2am to inspect leaking gutters at the workplace I was responsible for; if that helps. And you repaired them there and then, did you, leaving no part of the job until the morning? We did what was necessary to keep the (24x7) workplace running normally until further notice - the other option being to abandon ship. And then fixed it properly later. In the case of the trains, what is missing is the "restoring normal operation" aspect. -- Roland Perry |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 01:09:21 +0000 someone who may be Roland Perry
wrote this:- In the case of the trains, what is missing is the "restoring normal operation" aspect. I think the problem is that the trains are not considered important by the police. The utterances of our unlearned friend Mr Hidden don't help. -- David Hansen, Edinburgh | PGP email preferred-key number F566DA0E I will always explain revoked keys, unless the UK government prevents me using the RIP Act 2000. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 07:08:25 UTC, David Hansen
wrote: : On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 01:09:21 +0000 someone who may be Roland Perry : wrote this:- : : In the case of the trains, what is missing is : the "restoring normal operation" aspect. : : I think the problem is that the trains are not considered important : by the police. The utterances of our unlearned friend Mr Hidden : don't help. If a body was found in suspicious circumstances at 1am on the M8, do you think the police would cover stuff up with plastic and wait until after the morning rush hour to look for evidence? Ian |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ian Johnston" wrote in message news:cCUlhtvFIYkV-pn2-15gYwGsdV2Bd@localhost... If a body was found in suspicious circumstances at 1am on the M8, do you think the police would cover stuff up with plastic and wait until after the morning rush hour to look for evidence? Not a particularly good example. There are numerous examples of fatal crashes in which the evidence is dragged off the road within hours - basically as soon as the ambulances are gone. 'Getting the traffic flowing' is seen as a priority on the roads - even where some effort at investigation is made, often one or two lanes will be open. There doesn't seem much concern for disturbing potential evidence there. Richard |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12 Feb 2004 09:00:57 GMT someone who may be "Ian Johnston"
wrote this:- If a body was found in suspicious circumstances at 1am on the M8, do you think the police would cover stuff up with plastic and wait until after the morning rush hour to look for evidence? You fail to spot the fundamental difference. If one was to build a bridge over the surface of the M8 that motor vehicles could use then one would have a comparable situation. The height of this bridge above the road surface being the same as the difference in level between the ballast and rail head. -- David Hansen, Edinburgh | PGP email preferred-key number F566DA0E I will always explain revoked keys, unless the UK government prevents me using the RIP Act 2000. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Urgh - BalhamEsherLondonBalham | London Transport | |||
Oyster recovery & Balham trial | London Transport | |||
Balham to High St. Ken today? | London Transport | |||
Balham to Hatch End | London Transport |